That's got to be a mistake as I watched a YouTube of the MCARBO owner showing off the new sight and the peep hole is at least a half inch higher than the stock one. Did they mean to say "0.60" taller? As in six tenths of an inch higher?
Posts: 35039 | Location: Pennsylvania | Registered: November 12, 2007
Personally I think the solution is an additional extention on the bottom of the buttstock to still allow shoulder support but raise the buffer tube in line with the cheek. The gen 2 did several things but still did not address the awkward sight alignment.
Originally posted by bustabuddy: Why would you not have to replace/raise if possible the front sight if you are raising the rear sight that much?
One would have to raise it as listed on the linked page in the OP's post.
"You will have to quickly re-zero and make a minor height adjustment to your front sight post. It will be well within the operating range of the factory front sight."
----------------------------------- Regards, Steve The anticipation is often greater than the actual reward
