SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  Mason's Rifle Room    Would you buy a Chinese riflescope?
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Would you buy a Chinese riflescope? Login/Join 
Freethinker
Picture of sigfreund
posted
This question is prompted by the amazing number of videos and other Internet posts raving about the quality of the made-in-China Arken Optics line of scope sights. Formal reviews usually mention “for the price” someplace in the comments, but even after that caveat I almost never find any complaints about any aspect of the sights. I also frequently see them being used in YouTube videos even if it’s not a review.

So, here’s the question: Assuming that they are as good as they are widely claimed to be and they would be good enough for the type of shooting you’d do with one, would you buy one considering how competitively priced they are?

And to help avoid comments that jump to false conclusions about the reason for my question, I’m not considering anything from the line myself. I won’t list the brands of scopes I’ve purchased in recent years, but none was made or assembled in China (as far as I know).

Question:
Would you buy one if it fit your needs?

Choices:
Yes.
No.

 




6.4/93.6
___________
“We are Americans …. Together we have resisted the trap of appeasement, cynicism, and isolation that gives temptation to tyrants.”
— George H. W. Bush
 
Posts: 47924 | Location: 10,150 Feet Above Sea Level in Colorado | Registered: April 04, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of OttoSig
posted Hide Post
I own several Holosun products, so I’d be a hypocrite to say no.

However, the use determines what I buy. Firearms I consider using in a self defense situation I do not. Those have aimpoint or similarly heralded brand.

A 100% yes based of your, “type of shooting statement specifically”. With the caveat that if there was a similarly priced American brand with the exact same reputation I would buy elsewhere first.





10 years to retirement! Just waiting!
 
Posts: 6757 | Location: Georgia | Registered: August 10, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Since I use Vortex (China, Philippines, Japan) I voted yes. But I dont want to. I would love to see reasonably priced, good quality optics that are US made.
Rant: Am I the only person who thinks that optics pricing borders on insanity? 4K+ scopes? On a $1200 rifle. Nope!


End of Earth: 2 Miles
Upper Peninsula: 4 Miles
 
Posts: 16518 | Location: Marquette MI | Registered: July 08, 2014Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Oriental Redneck
Picture of 12131
posted Hide Post
No. The only chicom optic I have is the Primary Arms 1x SLx Prism "scope", and that's only because I didn't know it was chicom made at the time.


Q






 
Posts: 28119 | Location: TEXAS | Registered: September 04, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Have a few PA scopes and like them.

Never looked at Arken specifically so I'm not sure exactly what "Competitively priced" is exactly.

In comparing what I have on hand, the glass quality on my Accupowers are considerably better that that of the PA. At a cost 3+× the PA.

Now PA does have higher lines of scopes that are equal in price and quality to Trijicon. I have no experience with those.
 
Posts: 1901 | Location: East Tennessee | Registered: October 25, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I own exactly one scope. A Leupold VXII 3-9x40. I have never owned a bolt gun and it turns out I really love the irons on my M1A. The scope is currently on my Beeman R9. If I ever get a bolt gun I’ll most likely get a Leupold EFR for the air rifle and put the VXII on the bolt action. Even if I did upgrade for a bolt, I can’t see how anything Leupold makes wouldn’t cover my needs. I can be a part time hypocrite, and still smile knowing some American can feed his kids for the day. I can’t claim I buy American only but it still makes me feel good when I do.
 
Posts: 1222 | Registered: July 14, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I own one Chinese commie scope. It's Vortex LPV -- I bought it for price and it works fine. Glass is fairly bright, there's a little distortion at the edges, controls are a bit mushy. I didn't realize it was made in China at the time. I doubt I will make such mistake again.

I get that we all have budgets. I get that it can be challenging to purchase only products that aren't made in China, or made by Chinese owned companies. But we're gun owners here, and likely of a conservative frame of mind. We have a choice in what we buy.

I won't buy a Chinese scope.
 
Posts: 8078 | Location: Colorado | Registered: January 26, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Well like Otto sig said I kind of already have. Holosun, Primary Arms. I hate doing it but it’s a solid product at a good price point.
 
Posts: 7540 | Location: Florida | Registered: June 18, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
In today’s market, in a lot of cases you really don’t have much of a choice. For the features I need for my applications ( first focal plane, zero stop, appropriate reticle for my purposes adequate clarity, repeatable adjustments) I went with vortex (strike eagle) and to get a scope with similar features in a Japanese European or A Erica’s made scope would cost me a minimum of 6 times the cost.
My vortex with military discount was $550, for an equivalent scope from the states or Europe you would have to spend right around 3 grand. Simply a financial bridge too far.
 
Posts: 3433 | Location: Finally free in AZ! | Registered: February 14, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Frangas non Flectes
Picture of P220 Smudge
posted Hide Post
I have and I would again. I know, communists and all that. But at the end of the day, I have optics on rifles and I otherwise wouldn’t. Holosun, Primary Arms, and now a Sig LPVO sit atop my most used rifles, and they give me the capabilities I need from them. If I spent ten times on the Sig scope for instance, it would get me a Nightforce, and I’m sure it’s a great scope and I’d never say the Sig is just as good, but for my needs, it is good enough.

The following is not a statement about this thread or the discussion so far, but a general observation: A lot of this debate in the gun community is from people trying to conflate “good enough” with “just as good,” and I see it on both sides of the debate. I think it’s generally best if one is being realistic and honest with themselves.


______________________________________________
“There are plenty of good reasons for fighting, but no good reason ever to hate without reservation, to imagine that God Almighty Himself hates with you, too.”
 
Posts: 17856 | Location: Sonoran Desert | Registered: February 10, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of powermad
posted Hide Post
I buy and use what fits my needs and expectations.
It would be nice to be able to afford mid to top of the line optics, but that doesn't always work out unless you dump it on a credit card, which is something I don't like to do unless I already have the money to put it back.

I have an Arken, for less than $400 you could do a lot worse in that price range.
I think I paid $420 with the combo pack. Mount, caps, throw lever, level and a rear bag.

But it is heavy, 3 lbs with an MWI mount.

Now a few of the China made scopes are using better quality Japanese or German glass.
Arken has a couple with Japanese glass.
Vector is using German optics with a fiber dot reticle like the Primary Arms Nova reticle.

And while the Arken is a decent scope and a good value for the money it is not just as good as my lower end NF NXS but it does meet my needs and exceeds my expectations.

I've been saving up for a NF NX8 1-8 to replace the PA 1-8.
The PA works but the NX8 has everything I am looking for in a 1-8, which costs a bit more but they have what I want.
In the meantime the PA will be good enough.
 
Posts: 1561 | Location: Portland Oregon | Registered: October 01, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
One aspect of this "problem" could be that folks have so many rifles, and they feel like each one needs some glass on it. You can only shoot one at a time; maybe consider investing in one or two quality optics of other-than-Chinese origin, and put them where they're needed at the time.

I am the guy who's willing to make feature compromises for the sake of not buying Chinese, so take my comments with a grain of salt.
 
Posts: 2538 | Location: Northeast GA | Registered: February 15, 2021Reply With QuoteReport This Post
quarter MOA visionary
Picture of smschulz
posted Hide Post
Not knowingly, not that some can't have some redeeming value but just don't want to support them.
You also have to be careful too when a "good" line adds a cheaper/alternative lineup.

The latest purchases have been Steiner.
 
Posts: 23383 | Location: Houston, TX | Registered: June 11, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Sauer Kraut
posted Hide Post
Absolutely not
 
Posts: 755 | Location: Middle (of nowhere) Georgia  | Registered: December 04, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Absolutely not. If not buying a high-end scope, I try to find ones made in Japan.


Made in Texas, in the good ole' U.S. of A.
 
Posts: 245 | Location: Western North Carolina | Registered: May 11, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of ridewv
posted Hide Post
I might, but I prefer not to. When researching different LPVO's it seemed like most were made in China with others from Philippines, Malaysia, Japan, and Europe. I chose a Trijicon Credo which was manufactured in Japan.


No car is as much fun to drive, as any motorcycle is to ride.
 
Posts: 7355 | Location: Northern WV | Registered: January 17, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Void Where Prohibited
Picture of WaterburyBob
posted Hide Post
No, out of principle. I'll pay more for something not made in China.



"If Gun Control worked, Chicago would look like Mayberry, not Thunderdome" - Cam Edwards
 
Posts: 16705 | Location: Under the Boot of Tyranny in Connectistan | Registered: February 02, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Nope.


---------------------------------------------
"AND YEA THOUGH THE HINDUS SPEAK OF KARMA, I IMPLORE YOU...GIVE HER A BREAK, LORD". - Clark W. Griswald
 
Posts: 2360 | Location: The South | Registered: September 12, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by OttoSig:
I own several Holosun products, so I’d be a hypocrite


The holosun is the perfect example. I own both a a trijicon rmr and holosun. I would never buy a trijicon again. Double the money for less features.

At first trijicon was the tits as far as the rmr went and durability. However they really screwed the pooch with the battery location and need for additional mounting plate. Holosun not only made a better design but also matched them in durability.


 
Posts: 5485 | Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA | Registered: February 27, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I am willing to pay for quality. However, I am not a brand loyalist. Like others, I have purchased Chinese optics and I am in the market for a thermal scope. The Chinese scopes are feature rich with good durability and customer service. Makes it hard to justify the 1.5x to 3X premium for a US made scope with less features and relatively poor customer service.
 
Posts: 2034 | Location: Virginia | Registered: April 08, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  Mason's Rifle Room    Would you buy a Chinese riflescope?

© SIGforum 2024