Generally when a cartridge is created from a parent cartridge, the shoulder is positioned in such a way as to preclude chambering the larger bored ammunition in the smaller bored chamber.
I looked around for a picture of the two side by side, and couldn't find one.
Posts: 14186 | Location: Indiana | Registered: December 04, 2003
They gave the 224 a nice long neck to hold those long bullets, I would expect the shoulder to be pushed back and blown out with less taper than what the 6.8 has, but again, I am just speculating.
Posts: 14186 | Location: Indiana | Registered: December 04, 2003
The OP's question isn't off the wall -- given that putting a 300blk round in a 223 rifle wasn't supposed cause a kaboom. And yet there are a few documented times where that 300blk round was somehow torched off in a 223, even though it didn't really "chamber" in the rifle.
I don't know the answer, however.
Posts: 8088 | Location: Colorado | Registered: January 26, 2008
I would expect Federal would consider and design against accidental loading of a 6.8 round in a 224 rifle, but just wondering if it was real world possible. The rounds share magazines and bolts, so only the barrel chamber stands in the way.
Posts: 2034 | Location: Virginia | Registered: April 08, 2012
No. It won't chamber for the reasons stated above. Since my last post, I acquired a .224 Valkyrie barrel and built mine. I tried a 6.8 round in a .224 Valkyrie Case Gauge. It doesn't fit. The 6.8 sticks out of the Valkyrie case gauge between 1/4-1/2". Not even close to chambering. Unable to show via photo on this site. But sent a photo via email.
Posts: 605 | Location: DFW Area | Registered: January 12, 2015