SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  Mason's Rifle Room    Why aren't bullpups more popular/prolific?
Page 1 2 3 4 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Why aren't bullpups more popular/prolific? Login/Join 
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by sigfreund:
An interesting video about “explosions” at the ejection port of the Springfield Armory “Hellion” bullpup that could be a problem with the gun.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R3FT5dxcItw


Lost consciousness after listening to him drone on after a couple of minutes. What’s the short version?
 
Posts: 3465 | Location: South FL | Registered: February 09, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Almost certainly silencer-related, I'd say. My internet is too crappy right now to watch the video, but I gleaned from the comments that it was suppressed.
 
Posts: 2552 | Location: Northeast GA | Registered: February 15, 2021Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Fighting the good fight
Picture of RogueJSK
posted Hide Post
quote:
Another interesting aspect of the discussion is the fact that the nations that do utilize bullpups still don't equip their most elite units with them.


Dredging up this comment from the OP, because an interesting part of the Ukrainian conflict has been that their special operations units seem to prefer bullpup rifles.

In addition to more standard rifles, they've been frequently photographed with Malyuk bullpups:





 
Posts: 33437 | Location: Northwest Arkansas | Registered: January 06, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Freethinker
Picture of sigfreund
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Dwill104:
What’s the short version?


“Explosive” fireball discharges occurred at the ejection ports of two of the rifles when fired. They were pictured more than once, but one is at the 0:41 mark of the video.

Supposedly they may have occurred without suppressors on the guns, but the vast majority were with the rifles suppressed. The narrator also advised that they were most common in cold air temperatures. No one seems to know why they occurred, but there was of course much speculation, some sensible, some not. Inspection of the fired cases showed that they were not out-of-battery or overpressure discharges.

The discharges were disconcerting, but not harmful if the ejection port is open on the shooter’s dominant side, but is believed to possibly be hazardous if, for example the right side port were open and the gun was being fired from the shooter’s left shoulder.

If that’s not enough, tough up and use the fast forward feature of the video to skip over the droning. Wink







“I don’t want some ‘gun nut’ training my officers [about firearms].”
— Unidentified chief of an American police department.

“I can’t give you brains, but I can give you a diploma.”
— The Wizard of Oz

This life is a drill. It is only a drill. If it had been a real life, you would have been given instructions about where to go and what to do.
 
Posts: 47955 | Location: 10,150 Feet Above Sea Level in Colorado | Registered: April 04, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I withdraw my silencer comment. The explosive event may be slightly aggravated by the presence of the can, but it's an OSS can, and I know them to work as advertised. So, I don't think it is something caused by the introduction of the silencer; exacerbated, sure, but not caused. Certainly interesting, considering the gun's military history. I am sure someone at Springfield is at least slightly irritated by the internet social media firearms community rabble this video will cause. I'd be interested to see footage of other suppressed firearms ejection ports, and their flash signatures; no way it's a phenomenon exclusive of other designs. I think it goes without saying that the VHS doesn't suppress well! I have enough trouble with leftover gasses escaping the ejection port, let alone friggen explosions.
 
Posts: 2552 | Location: Northeast GA | Registered: February 15, 2021Reply With QuoteReport This Post
is circumspective
Picture of vinnybass
posted Hide Post
That photo clearly indicates how unfriendly they might be to left-handed shooters.



"We're all travelers in this world. From the sweet grass to the packing house. Birth 'til death. We travel between the eternities."
 
Posts: 5581 | Location: Las Vegas, NV. | Registered: May 30, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Freethinker
Picture of sigfreund
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by vinnybass:
That photo clearly indicates how unfriendly they might be to left-handed shooters.


To be fair to the rifle, it is possible to configure it to eject to the left. That’s not something we’d be doing in the middle of a firing string in a competition or other event, though, and as the narrator in the video pointed out sometimes shooters do switch shoulders on the fly. We had a discussion here on the forum about the maneuver and a number of members said they believe it’s important to be able to do that. Even though I’m not a fan of the technique I’d like the option, and I’d be leery of a rifle that exhibited that problem.




“I don’t want some ‘gun nut’ training my officers [about firearms].”
— Unidentified chief of an American police department.

“I can’t give you brains, but I can give you a diploma.”
— The Wizard of Oz

This life is a drill. It is only a drill. If it had been a real life, you would have been given instructions about where to go and what to do.
 
Posts: 47955 | Location: 10,150 Feet Above Sea Level in Colorado | Registered: April 04, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3 4  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  Mason's Rifle Room    Why aren't bullpups more popular/prolific?

© SIGforum 2024