^^^My historical experience/knowledge of Colt (and firearms generally) began in 1994 as a result of the 1994 AWB, so other than what has transpired since that time frame, I am definitely NOT an expert. Some quick searching revealed that the 'Blue Label' time frame began in 1991, but the specifics of product changes, distribution/production restrictions, etc are a bit unclear to me. I/We could certainly speculate that Colt could have either implemented changes during that time frame to potentially head off the looming AWB restrictions, or that they just caved to the Anti 2A crowd due to lack of strong principles, but I'm not sure we'll ever know. What is certain, is that Colt (and their management) seems to have lacked a compass for some time!
I do know that Colt as a manufacturer relies heavily on .gov, .mil & LE contracts for the majority of their business, and while they enjoy a good reputation for quality in the civilian/commercial market, that's not their primary customer base.
My comment regarding whether they care what the Anti Gunners think is primarily based on the fact that Firearm sales is basically all that they do. They don't really have a lot other business interests to protect, such as a huge clothing line, a large offering of branded products or other owned, but unrelated businesses. As such, there's nothing to be gained or protected by Colt pandering to anyone! Honestly, their statement regarding 'temporarily' ceasing sales to the civilian market seemed to make business sense at the time, and though the recent (and unprecedented) increase in demand seems to undermine their credibility as they've now resumed sales to the civilian market, it could just as easily (more than likely?) be a coincidence.
____________________________________________________________
If Some is Good, and More is Better.....then Too Much, is Just Enough !!
Trump 47....Make America Great Again!
"May Almighty God bless the United States of America" - parabellum 7/26/20
Live Free or Die!