The original version had a warning (from users) about using too many 357 loads and/or the 125gr. round. Is the new Carry Comp version any sturdier than he original? The 2 1/2" unit has an appeal to it if it built stronger than the original.
IIRC there was a weak spot in the forcing cone of original K-frames. This was the reason S&W didn't want them to have a steady diet of .357 Magnums. Also IIRC, that was engineered out of the new production K-frames. I would confirm this before shooting a lot of .357s through one, though.
I had a carry comp. It went away because it was ridiculously loud, and blinding in low light. I figured out I don’t want a comp on a “carry” gun. Or anything else, really.
Originally posted by arfmel: I had a carry comp. It went away because it was ridiculously loud, and blinding in low light. I figured out I don’t want a comp on a “carry” gun. Or anything else, really.
It is stronger than the original. The forcing cone has more material and there is a ball detent for the lock up. Also, I wouldn't worry about it blinding you in low light. I don't think the comp makes it much worse than the flash coming out of the front of the barrel. Louder it is.
I have a 19-6 from the original series. I sent the following to Smith & Wesson customer service:
quote:
Dear Customer Service:
I am the happy owner of a (new to me) mid 1980’s Model 19-6 with nickel finish. I have heard the rumor, more than once, that I should limit the number of .357 magnum rounds I fire through this gun, and typically use it with .38 spc.
Is there any truth to this, or will the cylinder and action take a lifetime of .357 shooting. I do not hand load, so I will always be running popular brand factory ammunition through the gun.
It fits my had beautifully and I look forward to enjoying it. Please advise.
Thank you very much,
They replied:
quote:
Hi, with the 19 we recommend standard .357 loads.
That said, I have largely shot 158 grain stuff, rather than the lighter, faster bullets.
"I vowed to myself to fight against evil more completely and more wholeheartedly than I ever did before. . . . That’s the only way to pay back part of that vast debt, to live up to and try to fulfill that tremendous obligation."
Alfred Hornik, Sunday, December 2, 1945 to his family, on his continuing duty to others for surviving WW II.
Posts: 12797 | Location: Central Florida | Registered: November 02, 2008
If you want to see the issue, watch the video below. Skip to 2:15 to cut to the chase. This is about the current production 66 (vs old.) I would assume, but can't say I know for an absolute fact, it would apply to new production 19s.
Edit: I've found pictures of the new production 19s. They do NOT have the flat spot in the forcing cone. So they should be the same as the new production 66s.
This message has been edited. Last edited by: BBMW,
Originally posted by BBMW: If you want to see the issue, watch the video below. Skip to 2:15 to cut to the chase. This is about the current production 66 (vs old.) I would assume, but can't say I know for an absolute fact, it would apply to new production 19s.
Edit: I've found pictures of the new production 19s. They do NOT have the flat spot in the forcing cone. So they should be the same as the new production 66s.
