SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  SIG Pistols    Modifying the Action of a CCW
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Modifying the Action of a CCW Login/Join 
Member
posted
Is it prudent to improve the DA and SA of a TDA CCW?
 
Posts: 232 | Registered: April 21, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
TDA?

I'll give a generic answer. People argue this a bunch. I have upgraded sights and a different trigger on my carry gun. The mods I know of that have actually got real people in trouble in court are things like the infamous "You're Fu€ked" dust cover and things like that. If someone has contrary evidence that someone's actually been hemmed up for a mod beyond something like the above I'd like to hear about it.

In court, in my experience, I will say that lawyers argue any and everything under the sun often things the layperson would find incredibly stupid. I would be ready to explain why I modified my CCW but as long as I can articulate it, I don't have a problem with it.
 
Posts: 3123 | Location: Pnw | Registered: March 21, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Still finding my way
Picture of Ryanp225
posted Hide Post
You may get better responses if you'd articulate what exactly it is that you want to do, why, and with what specific pistol. Your vague question along with obscure acronym (tda?) don't give us much to go on.
 
Posts: 10851 | Registered: January 04, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
War Damn Eagle!
Picture of Snake207
posted Hide Post
TDA = Traditional Double Action aka Double Action/Single Action.

I have zero reservations about trigger jobs on any of my CCW pistols.

All of the DA/SA pistols I carry concealed have had some sort of trigger work done -to varying degrees.


__________________________
www.opspectraining.com
"It pays to be a winner."
 
Posts: 12554 | Location: Realville | Registered: June 27, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
If you have an over zealous prosecutor who is looking to make a name for himself then it doesn’t matter whether you have modified your EDC firearm or not, he is going to try and come after you even if you have done everything correctly. A recent example of that would be the prosecution of James Love in Illinois by Assistant State's Attorney Brian Kerr. During the trial Kerr stated that Love intended to kill someone based simply upon the hollow point ammunition that he had loaded in the LC9 pistol. If it is his intention to get a conviction (whatever his motivation) then the prosecutor will throw everything at the wall to see what sticks and it won’t matter what you or haven’t done to your pistol.


Laughing in the face of danger is all well and good until danger laughs back.
 
Posts: 498 | Location: Oklahoma | Registered: July 08, 2017Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Thank you
Very little
Picture of HRK
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by DrewR:
If you have an over zealous prosecutor who is looking to make a name for himself then it doesn’t matter whether you have modified your EDC firearm or not, he is going to try and come after you even if you have done everything correctly. A recent example of that would be the prosecution of James Love in Illinois by Assistant State's Attorney Brian Kerr. During the trial Kerr stated that Love intended to kill someone based simply upon the hollow point ammunition that he had loaded in the LC9 pistol. If it is his intention to get a conviction (whatever his motivation) then the prosecutor will throw everything at the wall to see what sticks and it won’t matter what you or haven’t done to your pistol.


I think that further drives the reasons not to modify the firearm, specifically with sayings such as "Smile Wait for Flash" its going to be used to portray you in a negative light to the jury, why help the DA just to exercise your rights to modify the firearm.

Its important especially if you live and work in an area of the country that isn't firearm friendly, or have one of those politically driven DA's that lives for this.

Other than that it's not going to matter as was said if you have a DA like Brian Kerr, and you can do whatever you wish. Just understand in the long run you might be just making it harder on your attorney and yourself.
 
Posts: 24498 | Location: Gunshine State | Registered: November 07, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Where liberty dwells,
there is my country
Picture of Nick
posted Hide Post
A clean shoot is a clean shoot. You either responded correctly under the law or you did not. It would be a good idea to know the laws that govern prudent use of deadly force and follow them. Know how to articulate your situation and actions, but most importantly, learn to shut the f*ck up until you have spoken with an attorney. The number of people that screwed themselves into a conviction by being a dumb shit or talking to police before their attorney, far outweigh the odds of going to jail because you polished your trigger parts.


"Escaped the liberal Borg and living free"
 
Posts: 2227 | Location: North Carolina, USA | Registered: January 21, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
You're going to feel
a little pressure...
posted Hide Post
If you're really concerned, have it "improved" by the factory custom shop. Certified safe by the manufacturer. That would limit the discussion.

YMMV,

Bruce






"The designer of the gun had clearly not been instructed to beat about the bush. 'Make it evil,' he'd been told. 'Make it totally clear that this gun has a right end and a wrong end. Make it totally clear to anyone standing at the wrong end that things are going badly for them. If that means sticking all sort of spikes and prongs and blackened bits all over it then so be it. This is not a gun for hanging over the fireplace or sticking in the umbrella stand, it is a gun for going out and making people miserable with." -Douglas Adams

“It is just as difficult and dangerous to try to free a people that wants to remain servile as it is to try to enslave a people that wants to remain free."
-Niccolo Machiavelli

The trouble with fighting for human freedom is that one spends most of one's time defending scoundrels. For it is against scoundrels that oppressive laws are first aimed, and oppression must be stopped at the beginning if it is to be stopped at all. -Mencken
 
Posts: 4251 | Location: AK-49 | Registered: October 06, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of az4783054
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RNshooter:
If you're really concerned, have it "improved" by the factory custom shop. Certified safe by the manufacturer. That would limit the discussion.

YMMV,

Bruce


This makes the most sense. A DIY action job might not be in your best self defense interest.


If people would mind their own damn business this country would be better off. I owe no one an explanation or an apology for my personal opinion.
 
Posts: 11205 | Location: Somewhere north of a hot humid hell in the summer | Registered: January 09, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
IANAL, but based on what I've read, I think that modifying the action of a DA/SA CCW gun (or any action type) is not likely to cause an issue if you 1) use a reputable gunsmith or a factory custom shop, and 2) stay within factory specs, or at least within a generally accepted standard for a particular gun (i.e., 4lbs or heavier trigger pull for a 1911) for carry/duty use.

This is in addition to making sure the action remains safe and reliability hasn't been compromised.

And it helps if you can articulate a legitimate reason for the work done...

Prosecutor: Why did you have your gun's trigger lightened?

Defendant: I had my gun's trigger pull smoothed and lightened, within factory specifications, so I could shoot more accurately, reducing the risk to innocent bystanders.


Of course, as has been stated, the safest approach would be to keep the gun's action stock.



"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts." Sherlock Holmes
 
Posts: 1286 | Registered: February 26, 2015Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Nick:
A clean shoot is a clean shoot.


The only problem with this line of thinking is that you're not the one who determines if it's a clean shoot.



"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts." Sherlock Holmes
 
Posts: 1286 | Registered: February 26, 2015Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
The path I went involved finding an off-the-shelf pistol that met my expectations and didn’t require any additional work. I currently carry a P225-A1 because it is an outstanding and comfortable pistol but I also choose it because it shipped with G10 grips and a SRT kit installed from the factory. The trigger pull is smooth and crisp and it included night sights. My Sig is factory original but it has all the upgrades that I have installed in my other Sigs.


Laughing in the face of danger is all well and good until danger laughs back.
 
Posts: 498 | Location: Oklahoma | Registered: July 08, 2017Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Snake207:
TDA = Traditional Double Action aka Double Action/Single Action.

I have zero reservations about trigger jobs on any of my CCW pistols.

All of the DA/SA pistols I carry concealed have had some sort of trigger work done -to varying degrees.


I agree. I'd doubt they'd disassemble the firearm and inspect for trigger jobs anyway.
 
Posts: 948 | Location: WV | Registered: May 30, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I think it could be more problematic in an accidental shooting case. I'm not talking about a regular negligent discharge, but if an innocent bystander is shot while you are defending yourself.

If their family sues you, their attorney might claim the you did not intentionally fire at the bad guy and miss, but that you did not intend to fire and the gun went off while it was pointed at their deceased relative because the trigger was too light.

That being said, I personally don't worry about it. If an aftermarket trigger or lighter spring will afford me better accuracy without compromising safety, I will use it.


------------------------------
"They who would give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin Franklin

"So this is how liberty dies; with thunderous applause."
- Senator Amidala (Star Wars III: Revenge of the Sith)
 
Posts: 1494 | Location: Southwest Ohio | Registered: October 07, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
We are talking about DA/SA not a competition SAO. About the lightest DA I've heard of in a TDA gun is 7 1/2 lbs DA for a competition level job. That is still 2lbs heavier than the Glock in every Cops holster with a longer trigger stroke.

A duty level DA/SA job should end up around 8.5-9.5 lbs DA and smooth with a 4-4.5 lb SA. I dont see how that isn’t as defensible as anything else out there.

A competition 1911 with a 2lb pull and a pinned grip safety is another thing altogether.




“People have to really suffer before they can risk doing what they love.” –Chuck Palahnuik

Be harder to kill: https://preparefit.ck.page
 
Posts: 5043 | Location: Oregon | Registered: October 02, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jaybirdaccountant:
quote:
Originally posted by Snake207:
TDA = Traditional Double Action aka Double Action/Single Action.

I have zero reservations about trigger jobs on any of my CCW pistols.

All of the DA/SA pistols I carry concealed have had some sort of trigger work done -to varying degrees.


I agree. I'd doubt they'd disassemble the firearm and inspect for trigger jobs anyway.


From what I understand, when the gun is seized as evidence, a firearms examiner will inspect the gun to make sure everything works the way it's supposed to and that it's within specs, including the trigger pull. Any anomalies would be noted in the report.

Of course, the specifics and amount of detail involved may vary according to the agency, the jurisdiction, the context of the investigation, etc.



"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts." Sherlock Holmes
 
Posts: 1286 | Registered: February 26, 2015Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I think the thing alot of folks forget when we all get into the weeds on this stuff is, it is far more important to be able to explain why you had to shoot someone than what mods are on the gun you shot them with.

I've been to alot of armorers courses and met alot of people who would be in the position to make evaluations on guns. I'd be alittle surprised if some of them would know a short reset trigger kit or an aftermarket guide rod. It's generally barrel length, trigger pull weight and is it mechanically functional. It's not a slam on anyone but remember we are gun people. Alot of people who work in the field are not unless they have a random interest.

I don't see it effecting you unless you are claiming you didn't intend to shoot. Then I can see mods being a big deal. Otherwise your justification for shooting is the big deal.
 
Posts: 3123 | Location: Pnw | Registered: March 21, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Prefontaine
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Strambo:
We are talking about DA/SA not a competition SAO. About the lightest DA I've heard of in a TDA gun is 7 1/2 lbs DA for a competition level job. That is still 2lbs heavier than the Glock in every Cops holster with a longer trigger stroke.

A duty level DA/SA job should end up around 8.5-9.5 lbs DA and smooth with a 4-4.5 lb SA. I dont see how that isn’t as defensible as anything else out there.

A competition 1911 with a 2lb pull and a pinned grip safety is another thing altogether.


I’ve said the same thing for a decade or longer concerning this. Prosecutor tries the “he/she modified” bs on a DA/SA that is 10#/4#. I’d have the defense attorney bring a Lyman gauge and test the pistol. Then test any cop in court’s pistol which will be most likely a striker, and most likely a Glock.

This is something I will never bat an eye about.



What am I doing? I'm talking to an empty telephone
 
Posts: 13042 | Location: Down South | Registered: January 16, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by DrewR:
If you have an over zealous prosecutor who is looking to make a name for himself then it doesn’t matter whether you have modified your EDC firearm or not, he is going to try and come after you even if you have done everything correctly. A recent example of that would be the prosecution of James Love in Illinois by Assistant State's Attorney Brian Kerr. During the trial Kerr stated that Love intended to kill someone based simply upon the hollow point ammunition that he had loaded in the LC9 pistol. If it is his intention to get a conviction (whatever his motivation) then the prosecutor will throw everything at the wall to see what sticks and it won’t matter what you or haven’t done to your pistol.


What do the police in that jurisdiction use for ammunition?
 
Posts: 6720 | Location: Virginia | Registered: January 22, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves lives
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by DrewR:
If you have an over zealous prosecutor who is looking to make a name for himself then it doesn’t matter whether you have modified your EDC firearm or not, he is going to try and come after you even if you have done everything correctly. A recent example of that would be the prosecution of James Love in Illinois by Assistant State's Attorney Brian Kerr. During the trial Kerr stated that Love intended to kill someone based simply upon the hollow point ammunition that he had loaded in the LC9 pistol. If it is his intention to get a conviction (whatever his motivation) then the prosecutor will throw everything at the wall to see what sticks and it won’t matter what you or haven’t done to your pistol.


https://www.galesburg.com/news...not-guilty-of-murder

He was also acquitted after a very short jury deliberation (1 hr 15 min). It takes 60 minutes or so to elect a jury foreman and get settled in the room.

A deliberation that short usually means that the jury was unanimous on the first vote, or in this case, That the hollow point argument made no difference and was ignored.

Apparently the only way for him to avoid that trial was to move years ago.


*****************************
"I don't own the night, I only operate a small franchise" - Author unknown
 
Posts: 2465 | Location: Texas | Registered: September 27, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  SIG Pistols    Modifying the Action of a CCW

© SIGforum 2024