SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  SIG Pistols    Surefire X300U-A: Proof that Surefire has lost their way
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Surefire X300U-A: Proof that Surefire has lost their way Login/Join 
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 12131:
quote:
Originally posted by monoblok:
Surefire X300U-A: Proof that Surefire has lost their way


There are no pics in your post. Not sure why you made it sound so complicated? It is not.

This is from Surefire's website: X300U-A WEAPONLIGHT. I see nothing new here. The A model's mounting has always been like this.

quote:
Originally posted by monoblok:
I want to know why the old single-screw clamping system was so bad that it needed replacement.

Are you talking about the X300U-B WEAPONLIGHT? It's still available.

Thank you for clarifying this. I hadn't realized that Surefire has both 'A' and 'B' setups. Based on this info my first X300 was a 'B', though at the time I didn't realize this was its designation; I was just under the impression it was 'the first'. So this time around, I assumed (dangerous thing, this assuming stuff) that 'A' was an updated solution, like 'P225' vs 'P225A' or 'P225A1'. I suppose that's on me for not thoroughly understanding Surefire's product naming.

As for the problems I encountered, the 'A' selection basically offers 4 separate mounting setup options. I discovered that two of them were useless for attaching the light to a Glock 17, but ONLY after trial and no-joy; the provided instructions gave ZERO info as to which of the choices would work on the Glock. Unfortunately for me, these two unworkable solutions were the ones that allowed me to simply slide the X300 onto the rail of the gun with no further histrionics...except neither of the two would actually LOCK the light onto the gun, obviously unsatisfactory choices that would allow the Surefire to move and likely slide off the gun with recoil. So the two 'easy' solutions are unworkable. Funny...I would've thought that Surefire would've made at least ONE of these perfectly suitable for a gun as COMMON with law enforcement at the full-size Glock frame...but NNNNOOOOOOOO...

The remaining two mounting solutions are variations on the same thing. Both require the disassembly of the clamping rails from the light in order to place a rail locking bar onto the X300, then fiddle fart pressing the light back against the gun while attaching the clamping rails back to the main body of the light. Doesn't sound all that hard, but Surefire THREADED the screw holes on the clamping sections which meant I had to push down HARD onto the light while driving those itty-bitty lil' screws into the X300 so that there wouldn't be a gap between the X300 and the clamping rail. And that SUCKED, because you see there's these things called arthritis and joint pain that makes dexterity and nimble finger motions something of a BITCH to accomplish. Then I rudely discovered that with the G17's slide in place, there wasn't adequate clearance to pivot the fricking hex wrench without interference from the slide. Even with slide removed, the remaining gun frame still caused the wrench to not be perfectly aligned with the screws; i.e., I had to slightly skew the wrench just to get on those damn tiny screws. A perfect scenario for stripping those little terrors (and yeah, the wrench DID slip more than a couple of times).

It was after I was finally done that the realization hit: damn it all, I'll have to go through this HEADACHE all over again when I have to change the damn battery!!!

Finally there was this lil' setting screw that is a part of the last two mounting setups. It's supposed to wedge the X300 tight to the bottom of the gun rail. Well that's fine if you have a rigid aluminum or steel rail that's being mounted to. On a Glock there's no such thing, just polymer with a thin piece of metal that's there for the serial number. Tighten that set screw up, watch that part of the frame CURL. I'm sure the slide will still go on the frame; Surefire wouldn't include stupid directions that would actually BREAK the gun (or at least deform the frame), would they? NAAWWWWW....

Yeah that was a smart move, Surefire. Of course there's NO MENTION of this possibility in the instructions. Leave it up to trial and error once again.

So yes Q, I was thoroughly ANNOYED by this whole exercise. Like I said above, I didn't realize that the X300 had co-existing 'A's and 'B's. I thought the 'A' was their latest and greatest, but found it CLEARLY was far from that. And I STILL have to go through this same damn exercise whenever the battery needs changing, all the while my joints are only going to get more painful with time.

I think I better find a 'B' before it's too painful, and junk this 'A'. Except I'm in no mood to give Surefire any more of my business. Not that they would notice since they've got all those police agencies and tactical wannabes to leech money from. But at least I'll feel BETTER with my decision, having to resort to buying some Chinese-made Streamlight or Olight.

<rant #2 off>

EDIT:

Oh I forgot the pic, after it wuz done. Looks so innocent, don't it? <grumble, grrr>



Never again, Surefire...


-MG
 
Posts: 2276 | Location: The commie, rainy side of WA | Registered: April 19, 2020Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Imagination and focus
become reality
posted Hide Post
I have the Surefire X300U-B that currently sits on my Mossberg 930 SPX. It works equally as well on a pistol. I still have my Surefire X200A, my first weapon light. The A is the slide on version. I really like the Surefire line of lights.
 
Posts: 6796 | Location: Northwest Indiana | Registered: August 15, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Peace through
superior firepower
Picture of parabellum
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by monoblok:
Never again, Surefire...
Jesus Christ, man. Maybe just get you a Maglite and tape it to your pistol, huh? This stuff is really not that hard to comprehend.
 
Posts: 110017 | Registered: January 20, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
The Unknown
Stuntman
Picture of bionic218
posted Hide Post
quote:
I was thinking the same and I did find this Olight on amazon


I've got the Olight Valkyrie PL2 on my bedside gun. Various claims say it's not as good as this brand or that, but three years and several hundred rounds later it's still solidly hanging on (install whatever key you need and clamp it to the rail). Makes things bright when I want it and dark when I don't. Super easy to take off and on, simple switches that are easily accessible, and it fits in any holster made for a TLR-1...I don't what else I'd want in a WML?
 
Posts: 10833 | Location: missouri | Registered: October 18, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by monoblok:



Never again, Surefire...


This is a "you" problem. They sell tens of thousands of these things and folks seem to be able to figure it out.

With the slide lock you have installed, you can install it with the "P" attachment and not tighten up the rear screw and it will work fine. You'll need only pull back on the two tabs and slide the locking bar out of the way to swap batteries.

Or you go back to the clamp bar style and use the "P" plate and it should be no issue to just slide it on and off.
 
Posts: 5253 | Location: Iowa | Registered: February 24, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by DaBigBR:
This is a "you" problem. They sell tens of thousands of these things and folks seem to be able to figure it out.

With the slide lock you have installed, you can install it with the "P" attachment and not tighten up the rear screw and it will work fine. You'll need only pull back on the two tabs and slide the locking bar out of the way to swap batteries.

Or you go back to the clamp bar style and use the "P" plate and it should be no issue to just slide it on and off.

(sigh)

Para is apparently already annoyed with me enough with as it is, but let me explain for the final time. I promise.

That serrated rectangle that one would THINK would slide back and forth? Nope. Not a chance. Why? Because internally the tail (switch) end of the plate that this faux lever tabs is molded to hook onto a small cross bar, mechanically making it impossible to slide to the rear. Moreover the openings in the X300's chassis that the lever ends pass through aren't sized to allow ANY backwards (or forward, for that matter) motion. I followed the illustrations in the instruction to a 'T', and this is what I got. And like a dumbfounded idiot I refused to believe what I was seeing as I was assembling the light, and DID I TRY to force that damn fakery of a lever back and forth after-the-fact. No dice. I even took the light off and rechecked my work; the innards are installed just like the Surefire illustrations show.

Oh and that rectangle that's forward of the non-operable slider lever? For those who are unfamiliar, that's the end of the cross bar that engages the rail slot. And lo and behold, the rectangular 'holes' that this cross bar passes through that are molded in the X300's chassis and clamping rails are EXACTLY sized for the bar and the bar alone. There is a second, unused bar that wasn't used because it barely engaged the rail slot. Both of these separate bars are supposed to be used with the 'faux' plate in place and besides, at the front of this plate there is no spring tension to allow for the bar to 'spring' up and down anyways. There is a short coil spring included in the parts kit that resides up front, but according to the instructions that part isn't used with the fake lever plate, only with the 'U' and 'P' plates.

In hindsight I kept looking at these pieces and wondering just how this motley collection would work; the bits in all of its configurations weren't adding up. The 'P' and 'U' plates made the most sense, but they simply didn't provide nearly enough vertical travel for the molded 'rail bar' at the forward end of each plate to engage with the Glock's rail slot. And that's why they weren't used. With those plates I tried fitting the light to a couple of different guns, like my Laugo Alien and SP-01 Tactical, but the same issue occurs: not enough vertical travel for the front end of the plate to engage a picatinny rail slot. My annoyance is with Surefire...and with myself, since I didn't choose to believe that this X300 wouldn't attach and work like I thought it should be designed to work. Damn silly of me to not believe what I was seeing, and to take it on faith that all would be AS ONE and by some miracle work out in the end.

So then I very briefly and rather irrationally thought...maybe this is a counterfeit...except that doesn't make ANY sense. I bought this X300 out of our own inventory and I know as fact that it came in from Surefire since I saw the receiving invoice for the entire lot which listed this 'A' light (as it happened, the coworker who placed the order apparently didn't understand the whole A/B thing either because he didn't order any 'B's). We ordered several of the 'A's and they were intermixed with the various other Surefire units and torches. So unless Surefire is in the habit of shipping fakes, the unit in the picture should be The Real Deal.

One last thing: When I said 'Surefire, never again...', I was directly referencing the 'A' style light in the pic. Now that I've experienced this particular piece of schlock, I think I have every right to be put off...and I am. You all might still think that I'm just a blithering idiot that doesn't have a clue at what I'm assembling, and sometimes that DOES happen (like when I rebuilt the A/C on a neighbor's pickup and got a couple of connections crossed), but I do consider myself somewhat mechanically UN-challenged and typically quite capable...aside from the omnipresent arthritis that I think I mentioned earlier. So despite me sounding very Chad-like, I have to stand by my assessment of Surefire, particularly in regards to this dumb-ass light that I bought.

No rant this time, just a calmed-down explanation of the cascade of events that transpired.


-MG
 
Posts: 2276 | Location: The commie, rainy side of WA | Registered: April 19, 2020Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by monoblok:
quote:
Originally posted by DaBigBR:
This is a "you" problem. They sell tens of thousands of these things and folks seem to be able to figure it out.

With the slide lock you have installed, you can install it with the "P" attachment and not tighten up the rear screw and it will work fine. You'll need only pull back on the two tabs and slide the locking bar out of the way to swap batteries.

Or you go back to the clamp bar style and use the "P" plate and it should be no issue to just slide it on and off.

(sigh)

Para is apparently already annoyed with me enough with as it is, but let me explain for the final time. I promise.

That serrated rectangle that one would THINK would slide back and forth? Nope. Not a chance. Why? Because internally the tail (switch) end of the plate that this faux lever tabs is molded to hook onto a small cross bar, mechanically making it impossible to slide to the rear. Moreover the openings in the X300's chassis that the lever ends pass through aren't sized to allow MUCH IF ANY backwards (or forward, for that matter) motion. I followed the illustrations in the instruction to a 'T', and this is what I got. And like a dumbfounded idiot I refused to believe what I was seeing as I was assembling the light, and DID I TRY to force that damn fakery of a lever back and forth after-the-fact. No dice. I even took the light off and rechecked my work; the innards are installed just like the Surefire illustrations show.

Oh and that rectangle that's forward of the non-operable slider lever? For those who are unfamiliar, that's the end of the cross bar that engages the rail slot. And lo and behold, the rectangular 'holes' that this cross bar passes through that are molded in the X300's chassis and clamping rails are EXACTLY sized for the bar and the bar alone. There is a second, unused bar that wasn't used because it barely engaged the rail slot. Both of these separate bars are supposed to be used with the 'faux' plate in place and besides, at the front of this plate there is no spring tension to allow for the bar to 'spring' up and down anyways. There is a short coil spring included in the parts kit that resides up front, but according to the instructions that part isn't used with the fake lever plate, only with the 'U' and 'P' plates.

(EDIT: in my response to DaBigBR, he gave me an idea when he mentioned the rear screw that controls a wedge underneath the tab plate. I thought that maybe if it added enough wedge, it might disengage the plate from the cross pin and then allow the tabs to move some...except that doesn't make any sense. How would that plate reengage that pin when putting everything back together? However adjusting that screw did allow the tabs to move (more like wiggle) a little. But in turning that setting screw perhaps too far, I heard a rather loud 'POP'. Uh oh...that didn't sound good. Something apparently gave on the outer shell of the X300, right around the opening of where the set screw is. The plastic looks broken and sheared, though relatively minor damage in the big scheme. I think I better quit while I still have a working light.)

In hindsight I kept looking at these pieces and wondering just how this motley collection would work; the bits in all of its configurations weren't adding up. The 'P' and 'U' plates made the most sense, but they simply didn't provide nearly enough vertical travel for the molded 'rail bar' at the forward end of each plate to engage with the Glock's rail slot. And that's why they weren't used. With those plates I tried fitting the light to a couple of different guns, like my Laugo Alien and SP-01 Tactical, but the same issue occurs: not enough vertical travel for the front end of the plate to engage a picatinny rail slot. My annoyance is with Surefire...and with myself, since I didn't choose to believe that this X300 wouldn't attach and work like I thought it should be designed to work. Damn silly of me to not believe what I was seeing, and to take it on faith that all would be AS ONE and by some miracle work out in the end.

So then I very briefly and rather irrationally thought...maybe this is a counterfeit...except that doesn't make ANY sense. I bought this X300 out of our own inventory and I know as fact that it came in from Surefire since I saw the receiving invoice for the entire lot which listed this 'A' light (as it happened, the coworker who placed the order apparently didn't understand the whole A/B thing either because he didn't order any 'B's). We ordered several of the 'A's and they were intermixed with the various other Surefire units and torches. So unless Surefire is in the habit of shipping fakes, the unit in the picture should be The Real Deal.

One last thing: When I said 'Surefire, never again...', I was directly referencing the 'A' style light in the pic. Now that I've experienced this particular piece of schlock, I think I have every right to be put off...and I am. You all might still think that I'm just a blithering idiot that doesn't have a clue at what I'm assembling, and sometimes that DOES happen (like when I rebuilt the A/C on a neighbor's pickup and got a couple of connections crossed), but I do consider myself somewhat mechanically UN-challenged and typically quite capable...aside from the omnipresent arthritis that I think I mentioned earlier. So despite me sounding very Chad-like, I have to stand by my assessment of Surefire, particularly in regards to this dumb-ass light that I bought.

No rant this time, just a calmed-down explanation of the cascade of events that transpired.


-MG
 
Posts: 2276 | Location: The commie, rainy side of WA | Registered: April 19, 2020Reply With QuoteReport This Post
NOT compromised!
Picture of SIGWALLY
posted Hide Post
RTFM? Sorry, Old Army sayings die hard...
 
Posts: 1533 | Location: Tampa Bay, Florida | Registered: July 06, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Purveyor of Death
and Destruction
Picture of walker77
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by monoblok:


Para is apparently already annoyed with me enough with as it is



Roll Eyes

I wonder why?
 
Posts: 7411 | Location: Raymore, Missouri | Registered: June 24, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I have a Surefire X300 pre-U model with a dog-11 switch that I ran on a gen 3 Glock that I now run on my gen 5 model 19. I changed it to the picatinny mount and it mounts perfectly, easy to remove or place on the pistol and holds firmly in place while in use to include while the pistol is fired. In fact, next on my want list is a X300U-A for my HKs.
 
Posts: 132 | Location: GA | Registered: April 01, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Peace through
superior firepower
Picture of parabellum
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by WRAM1:
I changed it to the picatinny mount and it mounts perfectly
Tighter'n Dick's hat band!
 
Posts: 110017 | Registered: January 20, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Inject yourself!
posted Hide Post
My guess in descending order of likelihood: user error, out of spec light or out of spec pistol rail.

My SureFire X300-A fits all my Glocks, Gen 3 through 5, 100% with the correct locking bar. They also fit all my Sigs, CZ and AR-15 Picatinny rails with the correct bar.

Maybe just switch back to the lever lock, works fine.

https://assets.surefire.com/up..._X300-ULTRA_RevE.pdf

SureFire makes good stuff with a good warranty and service. If nothing else, give them a call.




Do not send me to a heaven where there are no dogs.
Step Up or Stand Aside: Support the Troops !
Expectations are premeditated disappointments.
 
Posts: 8404 | Location: West | Registered: November 26, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  SIG Pistols    Surefire X300U-A: Proof that Surefire has lost their way

© SIGforum 2024