Member
| At current market values, the Python. Then I would sell it, buy a S&W 686 and pocket the extra $1500 or whatever. If they were worth the same, then the S&W 686. More everything available for those. |
| |
Member
| The Colts are a little prettier, but the S&W actions are more durable in my experience. If the guns were worth the same money, the S&W would be the better pick to me. |
| |
A man's got to know his limitations
| If I was buying one just to shoot, not worried about the value, it would be the 686.
"But, as luck would have it, he stood up. He caught that chunk of lead." Gunnery Sergeant Carlos Hathcock |
| |
Member
| 686 for me too.
End of Earth: 2 Miles Upper Peninsula: 4 Miles
|
| |
Avoiding slam fires
| I prefer the 586 cause it is not too flashy and have it Colt are more if an investment but that is for younger folk. |
| |
Member
| It would definitely be the 686. The Smith can be a range toy, a BBQ gun, or carried for self defense. There is decent after-market support, and I wouldn’t worry about scuffing it up. Plus, I would imaging it is easier to find a gunsmith who can work on the 686 then it is to find someone who can work on the Python.
Laughing in the face of danger is all well and good until danger laughs back.
|
| Posts: 498 | Location: Oklahoma | Registered: July 08, 2017 |
IP
|
|
Member
| I generally like the mid to shorter barrels, unless dedicated hunting revolvers. The 4” barrel is about ideal.
I did just buy a 6” S&W Model 57 in 41 Mag though. It was local & the price was right. |
| |
Man of few words
| I've always wanted a Python so I would choose the Python. |
| |
"Member"
| quote: Originally posted by APSAbner: At current market values, the Python. Then I would sell it, buy a S&W 686 and pocket the extra $1500 or whatever.
My thoughts exactly. Also, this... no bueno.
_____________________________________________________ Sliced bread, the greatest thing since the 1911.
|
| |
Member
| ^Yeah I’d take the McCormick too if it could fit it in my pocket.^ I kind of figured most people would take to Smith And Wesson. In my own scenario I would too. I just don’t think anything about the Pythons justify their current value. I find it interesting how most of us would pick the 686 if they were the same price yet so many people keep on paying the big bucks for the Pythons.
DDG-8 "Sine Timore"
|
| Posts: 155 | Location: United States | Registered: May 05, 2013 |
IP
|
|
Member
| Python, I simply think having a Colt is cooler than a Smith. I've always wanted a Trooper MkV.
"Ninja kick the damn rabbit" |
| Posts: 4648 | Location: Oklahoma | Registered: October 11, 2008 |
IP
|
|
I have not yet begun to procrastinate
| 686
-------- After the game, the King and the pawn go into the same box.
|
| Posts: 3902 | Location: Central AZ | Registered: October 26, 2006 |
IP
|
|