Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
Member |
Good news for the good guys. I can remember fighting the lounge lizards trying to get night sights approved for my duty weapon (P220). The brass resisted any changes even if I paid for it. I did it anyway... If people would mind their own damn business this country would be better off. I owe no one an explanation or an apology for my personal opinion. | |||
|
Member |
Sig allegedly has a ruggedized LEO Romeo coming out. No idea whether it will be available to civilians. _________________________________________ I'm all jacked up on Mountain Dew... | |||
|
With bad intent |
Id like to see that. I don't believe 've seen any Sig accessory that would run neck and neck with the more proven military optics. I have a Kilo 2000, Romeo 4C and Whiskey 3-15. I havent had any issues with any of them but the build quality just doesnt seem to be there. They also dont see hard use except the Kilo 2000, it doesn't get abused but it gets used a lot. ________________________________ | |||
|
Member |
It's been nearly a year ago that the Pentagon learned there was a lot, a whole lot of head shots happening in the middle east. So (likely cost a million dollars, of course) sent an investigation team over there. Found out, although the red dot sights had been on armorers shelves for a long time__a few soldiers finally tried them out. Then hundreds after learning those head shots were due to the red dot sights. What bothers me? I worked hard in the Marines (1950)to earn my Expert Rifleman badge. Now these red dots make everyone an expert! Oh, well__ I still have my Expert Rifleman badge! If you haven't looked seriously into these red dot sights, do. Most critical remarks are from those that haven't used them. Stay safe Poli Viejo | |||
|
With bad intent |
huh? ________________________________ | |||
|
Fighting the good fight |
Horn: Please provide a link to this 2017 Pentagon report on RMR-equipped handgun head shots in the Middle East. Sounds like you've read it. Which units had hundreds of soldiers routinely fighting at close ranges with pistols in the Middle East in 2017? Where in the Middle East were these frequent close range pistol fights occurring last year? What types of pistols and red dots were they using? Since there were hundreds of soldiers equipped with pistol with red dots, and these handgun red dots had been sitting on shelves in armories for a long time, surely there must be logistics/purchasing info out there for the pistols, optics, and related accessories like optic-compatible holsters. Some NSN numbers, at least. Why have there been no other reports from any other source of large-scale pistol optics adoption by US military units, or of widespread close combat handgun fights with frequent headshots just last year? | |||
|
Go ahead punk, make my day |
Wut? | |||
|
fugitive from reality |
Yea, I'm calling shenanigans on this one. _____________________________ 'I'm pretty fly for a white guy'. | |||
|
Member |
The version I heard was that it was Marines with ACOGs in Fallujah. Interestingly enough I've only ever seen it referenced on Firearms Forums and I've never found official corroboration of said investigation. Just because I haven't found it, doesn't mean it didn't happen of course. | |||
|
Fighting the good fight |
But don't be so hasty... I'm sure he'll be along shortly with reasonable answers to my simple questions. They shouldn't be too hard to find, considering it all took place just last year.
Same-same, no? "Rifles with ACOGs in 2004" ... "Handguns with RMRs in 2017" ... It's all just tomato/potahto, amiright? | |||
|
Member |
The ACOG one has been around for a while. This RMR one is new to me. I suspect neither is true. | |||
|
Fighting the good fight |
Well, you know how rumors and urban legends are... They tend to come back around every so often, usually with some slightly different details to try and keep them relevant. (I still want to read about all those close-range pistol fights our handful of advisers and Special Operations troops left in Syria and Iraq are engaging in, though... Sounds like a hell of a good story. ) | |||
|
fugitive from reality |
The version I was aware of was it was infantry units equipped with the M68 CCO at ranges <200 meters. The flat trajectory plus the ease of aiming equaled a lot of head shots. _____________________________ 'I'm pretty fly for a white guy'. | |||
|
Member |
This is from an interview with Yong Lee on the firearms nation podcast. I think they are leaning towards the sig optics due to his dept running 320’s and his experience as a Uspsa grandmaster and team sig shooter. I personally have no experience with the sig dots. _________________________________________ I'm all jacked up on Mountain Dew... | |||
|
Go ahead punk, make my day |
Good thing is if it's able to be broken, cops / soldiers will succeed and we'll get more data on how good it might be! | |||
|
Little ray of sunshine |
When I first got an Aimpoint, it felt like cheating. So fast and easy to use. I had shot some 3 gun matches with iron sights, and with that Aimpoint, my times dropped sharply overnight, and my accuracy improved a bit. The accuracy jump wasn't as sharp as the speed jump. The fish is mute, expressionless. The fish doesn't think because the fish knows everything. | |||
|
Member |
He also put 14K through the first one in his white paper. That is more than most LEO's will shoot in a career. I'm carrying one on top of an X-Carry for duty and love it. I shoot around 1K a month and haven't had any issues. I actually prefer it to my type 2 RM06 that is on my off-duty 320c. X-Carry (ACRO & DPP slides), X5 x2 (w/ DPPs, gas pedals, Springer guide rods) | |||
|
Member |
The T model was scrapped X-Carry (ACRO & DPP slides), X5 x2 (w/ DPPs, gas pedals, Springer guide rods) | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |