SIGforum
What do we like in 44 Magnum revolvers

This topic can be found at:
https://sigforum.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/430601935/m/7900069724

July 28, 2017, 04:41 PM
AKSuperDually
What do we like in 44 Magnum revolvers
I use a 329pd for carry in bear country (when I'm unlikely to need it, or as a secondary sidearm).

I also have a bisley super blackhawk.

I use a 12 gauge or bring my 45-70 if I actually think I'm going to need it.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"The trouble with our Liberal friends...is not that they're ignorant, it's just that they know so much that isn't so." Ronald Reagan, 1964
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Arguing with some people is like playing chess with a pigeon. It doesn't matter how good I am at chess, the pigeon will just take a shit on the board, strut around knocking over all the pieces and act like it won.. and in some cases it will insult you at the same time." DevlDogs55, 2014 Big Grin
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
July 28, 2017, 05:00 PM
flashguy
I like the Ruger Old Model Blackhawk with a 4 5/8" barrel.

flashguy




Texan by choice, not accident of birth
July 28, 2017, 05:02 PM
enidpd804
quote:
Originally posted by Outnumbered:
S&W 629-4 with 4" barrel.


This right here. They are expensive nowadays, but they're worth it.





Warren

https://www.policeone.com/columnists/warren-wilson/

www.defensivetrainingservices.com
July 28, 2017, 05:27 PM
Mars_Attacks
The Ruger will laugh off loads that would disintegrate the Smith and Wesson.


____________________________

Eeewwww, don't touch it!
Here, poke at it with this stick.
July 28, 2017, 05:39 PM
James in Denver
Just a curiosity question...

Why is the 629-4 rated over the 29-2? Collectability aside, is the 29-2 not better? "Pinned and recessed" (pinned barrel? and recessed cylinder?)

I don't know much about wheelie guns, but I've always wanted a "Dirty Harry" gun. Smile

quote:
Originally posted by Outnumbered:
S&W 629-4 with 4" barrel. Why? Because it's damn near if not the best ever. Stainless for durability in the elements, -4 because it's got everything you want and nothing you don't, and 4" because it's long enough to achieve good velocity and aim but short enough to carry easily.



----------------------------
"Voldemorte himself created his worst enemy, just as tyrants everywhere do! Have you any idea how much tyrants fear the people they oppress? All of them realize that, one day, amongst their many victims, there is sure to be one who rises against them and strikes back!"
Book 6 - Ch 23
July 28, 2017, 05:54 PM
RaiseHal
Look for a used S&W 629 5" Classic, it's damn near perfect.

As for the Taurus, there is a reason it's half the cost.


It's a shame that youth is wasted on the young --- Mark Twain

Anyone who is not a liberal by age 20 has no heart; anyone who is not a conservative by age 40 has no brain---Winston Churchill
July 28, 2017, 05:57 PM
Jelly
For camping hunting I've always like a good 44 mag around. The funny thing is the barrels have got shorter for me over the years, just find shorter barrel one more handy.
My current one is a Stainless Super Blackhawk Bisley in 3.75 barrel length.



July 28, 2017, 06:30 PM
BMR
quote:
Originally posted by Mars_Attacks:
The Ruger will laugh off loads that would disintegrate the Smith and Wesson.


This is exactly right. About 12 years ago when I had one of the best revolver smiths in the country, Alex Hamilton in San Antonio, tune my Ruger, he said to me "you will never shoot a Ruger loose, the others don't even come close to their strength." Not really a big deal what you choose in a .44 when you are shooting standard factory loads, but Ruger, because of the longer cylinder and heavier build, can be loaded with those +P loads.

To me, a .44 is certainly not ideal for protection against a grizzly bear, as opposed to a rifle or shotgun with heavy sabots, but I certainly want the heaviest load possible. I came within about 30 yards of a grizzly on one elk bowhunting trip in Montana just an hour south of Glacier, and I was glad I had 340 gr +Ps loaded in mine. Factory standard 240 grain rounds or even 300 grain rounds don't cut it, other than for hunting.



July 28, 2017, 06:39 PM
ml1209
quote:
Originally posted by enidpd804:
quote:
Originally posted by Outnumbered:
S&W 629-4 with 4" barrel.


This right here. They are expensive nowadays, but they're worth it.



Like how much approx?
July 28, 2017, 06:39 PM
ml1209
quote:
Originally posted by Jelly:
For camping hunting I've always like a good 44 mag around. The funny thing is the barrels have got shorter for me over the years, just find shorter barrel one more handy.
My current one is a Stainless Super Blackhawk Bisley in 3.75 barrel length.







That's very pretty.
July 28, 2017, 07:19 PM
jaybirdaccountant
quote:
Originally posted by James in Denver:
Just a curiosity question...

Why is the 629-4 rated over the 29-2? Collectability aside, is the 29-2 not better? "Pinned and recessed" (pinned barrel? and recessed cylinder?)

I don't know much about wheelie guns, but I've always wanted a "Dirty Harry" gun. Smile



Outside of collecting, pinned barrels and recessed cylinder have never been proven to be an better. I've never heard of a non pinned S&W barrel coming loose or the cartridge rim of any modern centerfire cartridge bursting.


My vote for a 44 to carried on long hikes is the S&W 69. While I prefer 5" or 6" for general hunting and shooting, the lightweight five shot 4" and 2 3/4" 69's make great packing guns. I have one in both barrel lengths.
July 28, 2017, 07:19 PM
CQB60
Ruger Alaskan for the win


______________________________________________
Life is short. It’s shorter with the wrong gun…
July 28, 2017, 07:27 PM
bigwagon
quote:
Originally posted by James in Denver:
Just a curiosity question...

Why is the 629-4 rated over the 29-2? Collectability aside, is the 29-2 not better? "Pinned and recessed" (pinned barrel? and recessed cylinder?)

I don't know much about wheelie guns, but I've always wanted a "Dirty Harry" gun. Smile


The -4 engineering revision includes internal updates known as the Endurance Package (radiused pins, deeper cylinder notches, longer bolt, etc.) that improve the durability of the action under heavy usage of magnum loads.
July 28, 2017, 07:57 PM
Tommydogg
This




___________________________
"I Get It Now"

Beth Greene
July 28, 2017, 08:42 PM
Outnumbered
In regards to the different 629 dash revisions, the dash 2E and forward had the endurance package that eliminated issues associated with the oft-repeated Internet folklore of "shooting a Smith 44 loose". That was an occasional issue with VERY high-volume 300gr load shooters.

Pretty much all the revisions are considered true performance/engineering improvements up thru the dash 4, with the exception of going to crush fit barrels and elimination of recessed cylinders; although those changes didn't negatively affect performance, reliability, or longevity.

Many things done at dash 5 on were production cost decisions, like MIM parts vs forged, etc. I hope it's OK to paste this here from elsewhere, rather than laboriously re-wording it.

Engineering and production changes:
• 629 1979 Introduction at N748564 - 1981 Introduce 4” and 8-3/8” barrels
• 629-1 1982 Eliminate cylinder counterbore and pinned barrel. Slight change in cylinder length to 1.69”
• 629-1 1986-87 8,000 manufactured. with round butt and 3” barrel, distributed by Lew Horton and S&W
• 629-2 1988 New yoke retention system/ Radius stud package/ floating hand, integral scope mounts available on 8-3/8” barrels
• 629-2E 1989 Endurance Package, Transitional changes, hardened yoke/frame
• 629-3 1989 Longer stop notch, bolt block added, fixed hand
• 629-4 1993 Change rear sight leaf, drill and tap frame, change extractor, Hogue grips introduced - 1996 Round butt Production only/ shipments in blue plastic 1997 Change Thumbpiece/ master trigger locks shipped
• 629-5 1997 Change frame design to eliminate cylinder stop stud - eliminate serrated tangs/change to MIM hammer with floating firing pin/ change to MIM trigger/change internal lockwork
• 629-6 2001 Introduce Internal Key Lock System
• 629-7 2005 New Two Piece barrel design
• 629-8 2006 Slabside Barrel



Regarding current Taurus guns, in my opinion, they're hit or miss like all production guns anymore, but historically have missed at a noticeably higher percentage than other major manufacturers. If you get a good one, you're thrilled with the performance to value ratio. If you get a turd like many people (myself included) have, it's much easier to get away with maligning them.

Ruger definitely offers a very rugged gun at a great value, albeit not as svelte as a S&W. If they're any more durable than a Smith, myself and 99.999% of shooters will never run enough ammo thru them to find out.

For the above reasons, I chose to sell my Rugers and Taurii to fund only Smith wheels. I believe them to be the apex of reliability, style, and value. YMMV
July 28, 2017, 09:39 PM
enidpd804
quote:
Originally posted by ml1209:
quote:
Originally posted by enidpd804:
quote:
Originally posted by Outnumbered:
S&W 629-4 with 4" barrel.


This right here. They are expensive nowadays, but they're worth it.


~ 800 for a 629 not considering the particular *dash*


Like how much approx?






Warren

https://www.policeone.com/columnists/warren-wilson/

www.defensivetrainingservices.com
July 28, 2017, 10:08 PM
bb405
Another vote for the 629-4 with 4" barrel, carry it every hunting, primarily to deal with feral hogs.


NRA Benefactor
July 28, 2017, 11:22 PM
marksman41
Does anybody know if the Dan Wesson revolvers were built strong enough to handle the heavier .44Mag loads?




July 29, 2017, 01:35 AM
sns3guppy
A lot of guides prefer Vaqueros in .44. I like the Super blackhawk, and on my .44 Vaquero, I use the super blackhawk hammer.

A gunfight with a bear is a poor idea, especially close. However, as a last-ditch tool against poor planning, poor practices, and bad luck, it will have to do.

I'm partial to the Redhawk. Not graceful, not as light as the 629 (or 69). Dependable and solid, however, and never a poor choice. I've never had a ruger revolver fail, though I've had a few Smith's do so.

I'm expecting delivery of a new 4" Redhawk in .41 when I get home this fall. It's my self-congratulations for surviving another go-around. I hope to see it get some good holster wear. I love single action revolvers, and someone who knows how to handle them can be pretty damn fast. There's very little to get in the way with a double action revolver pull, however. No small motor skils to miss, nothing but point and shoot then shoot again until empty.

Dont overlook a stout .45 Colt in a ruger built to handle the load.
July 29, 2017, 06:11 AM
Billy346
Crom-

I say go with the 629 or the Redhawk. Don't go with the Taurus. Taurus CAN be a good gun IF you get one that was made on a good quality control day. But the opposite can also be true.

I've got a 29 classic with the 6.5 inch barrel. It's my favorite gun. It comes to the range with me every time I go. I can nail bowling pins at 60 yards double action.

I had a Redhawk but sold it. It had the 7.5 inch barrel and was nose heavy. In my opinion, it was not as well balanced as the Smith. The double action trigger wasn't my favorite either. It was heavy and springy. That said, if you want to shoot .44 Magnum that borders on .454 Cassul, the Redhawk is your gun. I once heard a story of a guy that was shooting hand loads. The gun went bang, bang, BOOM! It recoiled up and hit him in the forehead. When he collected himself and tried to eject the case, it wouldn't come out. He has to use a steel rod and a sledge hammer to beat the case out of the cylinder. He said, after all that, the gun functioned fine. It turned out that he double charged a couple rounds accidentally. Something like that would have certainly blown a Smith to pieces.

So, in sum, If you want finesse, go Smith. If you want a gun that doubles as a cudgel, go Ruger.


"Like a horse has its rider, and the sky has its moon, a man has his loneliness, mistaken as pride." -Longmire