Oriental Redneck
| quote: Originally posted by David C.:
P365 vs P365 SAS
Which do you prefer and why?
Thanks
Not the SAS
Q
|
| | |
I kneel for my God,
and I stand for my flag
| quote: Originally posted by 12131:
Not the SAS[/url]
+1 |
| | | Posts: 1954 | Location: Oregon | Registered: September 25, 2001 | 
IP
|
|
Member
| The SAS is without a doubt an acquired taste. And, it does require a bit more trigger time (and familiarization) to be comfortable with the sights. Once you're comfortable, it's rather accurate out to 7-10 yards. The single rear sight is actually 2 separate sights, a tritium dial and a fiber optic. The SAS (Sig Anti Snag) feature makes this an excellent choice for pocket carry inside a suitable pocket holster. I own both the original and the SAS as well as the XL. The SAS is definitely my 3rd choice to carry but if it were all I had, I wouldn't be upset.
************************************************
"Tonight, we are a country awakened to danger and called to defend freedom. Our grief has turned to anger and anger to resolution. Whether we bring our enemies to justice or bring justice to our enemies, justice will be done". {George W. Bush, Post 9/11}
|
| | | Posts: 842 | Location: Long Island, N.Y. / Stephentown, N.Y. | Registered: March 20, 2010 |
IP
|
|
I'm entitled to this Title
| I sold my SAS (w/ XL grip module) after carrying it daily for 2+ years. Picked up a 365X and put a Holosun on it... Never looked back.
|
| | |
Member
| I have a 365SAS and a 365XL. The XL is a better weapon for everything but pocket carry. There is a place for both, just think of the SAS as an upgraded J frame revolver with twice the rounds and a quicker reload in a more potent caliber.
"I, however, place economy among the first and most important republican virtues, and public debt as the greatest of the dangers to be feared." Thomas Jefferson |
| | | Posts: 1574 | Location: Hartford, AL | Registered: April 05, 2007 |
IP
|
|
