SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  SIG Pistols    Question for Massachusetts members...and some Glock 19 porn
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Question for Massachusetts members...and some Glock 19 porn Login/Join 
Rail-less
and
Tail-less
posted
So are Preban mags still a think in MA? I purchased this very good condition 1991 Gen2 Glock 19 and it came with 3 preban G19 mags and 1 preban G17 mags. They all have +2 extensions but I have the original flat base pads. My question is do these mags still command a premium? I only paid $329 for the package so selling the mags separately would be the icing on the cake.





Here are some pics with my other G19’s




_______________________________________________
Use thumb-size bullets to create fist-size holes.
 
Posts: 13190 | Location: Charlotte, NC | Registered: May 07, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
A Beautiful Mind
Picture of DetonicsMk6
posted Hide Post
Nice collection! What weapon light is that on the Roland?
 
Posts: 4863 | Registered: March 06, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
A Beautiful Mind
Picture of DetonicsMk6
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by DetonicsMk6:
Nice collection! What weapon light is that on the Roland and how do you like it?
 
Posts: 4863 | Registered: March 06, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Vote the
BASTIDS OUT!
Picture of yanici
posted Hide Post
Yes, the pre-ban mags still get a premium here in MA. It's still legal for us in MA to buy them and possess them.


John

"Building a wall will violate the rights of millions of illegals." [Nancy Pelosi]
 
Posts: 2440 | Location: N.E. Massachusetts | Registered: June 05, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Rail-less
and
Tail-less
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by DetonicsMk6:
Nice collection! What weapon light is that on the Roland?


It’s the Inforce APL-C for Glock compact models.


_______________________________________________
Use thumb-size bullets to create fist-size holes.
 
Posts: 13190 | Location: Charlotte, NC | Registered: May 07, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Rail-less
and
Tail-less
posted Hide Post
Also the internals are not untreated steel like they are today. They look to be phosphate coated. Was that a thing back in the 90’s with Glocks?


_______________________________________________
Use thumb-size bullets to create fist-size holes.
 
Posts: 13190 | Location: Charlotte, NC | Registered: May 07, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
The cake is a lie!
Picture of Nismo
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Dusty78:
Also the internals are not untreated steel like they are today. They look to be phosphate coated. Was that a thing back in the 90’s with Glocks?


The black pre 6-part upgraded parts are a collectors item so I've heard.
 
Posts: 7460 | Location: CA | Registered: April 08, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Frangas non Flectes
Picture of P220 Smudge
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Dusty78:
Also the internals are not untreated steel like they are today. They look to be phosphate coated. Was that a thing back in the 90’s with Glocks?



Yep. Original early internals. I wonder if your frame has been relieved for the cracking issue. Probably not if it's that early. You might wanna check that before shooting it.


______________________________________________
“There are plenty of good reasons for fighting, but no good reason ever to hate without reservation, to imagine that God Almighty Himself hates with you, too.”
 
Posts: 17874 | Location: Sonoran Desert | Registered: February 10, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Rail-less
and
Tail-less
posted Hide Post
Where did they crack? I see none on the frame. Where are the relief cuts, on the inside of the dust cover?



_______________________________________________
Use thumb-size bullets to create fist-size holes.
 
Posts: 13190 | Location: Charlotte, NC | Registered: May 07, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Frangas non Flectes
Picture of P220 Smudge
posted Hide Post
Does not look like it's been done on your pistol. It's a hole milled almost vertically down into the frame at both rear corners of the locking block following its rear contour, from the side it looks like a cut through the polymer section of the frame rail guide there next to the locking block. Both my Gen 2 19's have it.

This was done to prevent cracking of the frame around that area. I'm not sure how common the problem was, but forum member XLT tracked down a Gen 2 19 a few months ago and upon further inspection, his was unmodified, and was indeed cracked. I know he got in touch with Glock, but I think they basically told him he could get a Gen 3 frame.

I have two thoughts about this gun. One is leave it absolutely as-is and stow it for collectors value for an early, original, unmodified clean example, and that's dependent on whether you also got the original tupperware, because that's a piece of the pie collectors look for if that's your angle on the gun. The other is see if Glock will do the frame modification, but the risk is that once you send it, you may have kissed away your Gen 2 frame forever because if they deem it unsafe in any way, you get a brand new gen 3 frame. If that bothers you, I would shoot it sparingly with standard pressure stuff.

And those two things hinge on this observation: Your internals might just not be the black lacquered early ones. Without a better pic, it's hard to tell, but your parts are shinier than the internals in my '93 and '94 vintage 19's which haven't had the six point upgrade, and nowhere near as black as the original internals in my 1986 Gen 1 17. If you can post some better pictures, it would be easier to tell. But if you have upgraded internals and Glock will do the frame modification (I believe only if it's not cracked), and you actually get your frame back, that would be a way to give a very nice Gen 2 19 the lifespan it deserves.

It could be argued whether there is any actual added collector's value to the thing being in completely original shape, but what is known is that Gen 2 19's without that mod can crack, and have cracked.


______________________________________________
“There are plenty of good reasons for fighting, but no good reason ever to hate without reservation, to imagine that God Almighty Himself hates with you, too.”
 
Posts: 17874 | Location: Sonoran Desert | Registered: February 10, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
"Member"
Picture of cas
posted Hide Post
"Premium"... yes, but a much lower one than back when the rest of the country was under the ban. I sold some Glock and a bunch of AR pre-ban mags to MA when the Safe Act passed. After a while (whenever I'd find more mags stashed in the house) I just started giving them away because selling them wasn't worth the bother. (There were even a few things I just threw away.)


_____________________________________________________
Sliced bread, the greatest thing since the 1911.

 
Posts: 21483 | Location: 18th & Fairfax  | Registered: May 17, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
My other Sig
is a Steyr.
Picture of .38supersig
posted Hide Post
Was thinking that on the two pin Gen2s that there was a polymer block that the grip was cast around. The cracks appeared at the edges of the polymer blocks where it is cast. Those should be fine as a 9mm. No hot 9s or 40 / 357Sig conversion for these.
The three pin versions no longer had the block and were cast as a single piece.



 
Posts: 9517 | Location: Somewhere looking for ammo that nobody has at a place I haven't been to for a pistol I couldn't live without... | Registered: December 02, 2014Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Frangas non Flectes
Picture of P220 Smudge
posted Hide Post
That was my initial understanting also, .38supersig. Turns out that unmodified Gen 2 19's can crack there, and some do. How big of a deal it actually is, likely is a matter of debate. But at least one forum member here in the last six months felt screwed over buying a used unmodified Gen 2 19 that was cracked.

Just trying to inform Dusty as to what it looks like he has to the best of my accrued knowledge.


I also just noticed it has the original target overhang rear sight. Pretty cool early feature. My Gen 1 came with that also.


______________________________________________
“There are plenty of good reasons for fighting, but no good reason ever to hate without reservation, to imagine that God Almighty Himself hates with you, too.”
 
Posts: 17874 | Location: Sonoran Desert | Registered: February 10, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of craigcpa
posted Hide Post
How are pre ban mags identified? Confused


==========================================
Just my 2¢
____________________________

Clowns to the left of me, Jokers to the right ♫♫♫
 
Posts: 7731 | Location: Raleighwood | Registered: June 27, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
The cake is a lie!
Picture of Nismo
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by craigcpa:
How are pre ban mags identified? Confused






Having non full metal lining is a sure way to tell, although they tend to start cracking all the way down the witness holes as seen on the #3 mag.
 
Posts: 7460 | Location: CA | Registered: April 08, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Rail-less
and
Tail-less
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by P220 Smudge:
Does not look like it's been done on your pistol. It's a hole milled almost vertically down into the frame at both rear corners of the locking block following its rear contour, from the side it looks like a cut through the polymer section of the frame rail guide there next to the locking block. Both my Gen 2 19's have it.


This was done to prevent cracking of the frame around that area. I'm not sure how common the problem was, but forum member XLT tracked down a Gen 2 19 a few months ago and upon further inspection, his was unmodified, and was indeed cracked. I know he got in touch with Glock, but I think they basically told him he could get a Gen 3 frame.

I have two thoughts about this gun. One is leave it absolutely as-is and stow it for collectors value for an early, original, unmodified clean example, and that's dependent on whether you also got the original tupperware, because that's a piece of the pie collectors look for if that's your angle on the gun. The other is see if Glock will do the frame modification, but the risk is that once you send it, you may have kissed away your Gen 2 frame forever because if they deem it unsafe in any way, you get a brand new gen 3 frame. If that bothers you, I would shoot it sparingly with standard pressure stuff.

And those two things hinge on this observation: Your internals might just not be the black lacquered early ones. Without a better pic, it's hard to tell, but your parts are shinier than the internals in my '93 and '94 vintage 19's which haven't had the six point upgrade, and nowhere near as black as the original internals in my 1986 Gen 1 17. If you can post some better pictures, it would be easier to tell. But if you have upgraded internals and Glock will do the frame modification (I believe only if it's not cracked), and you actually get your frame back, that would be a way to give a very nice Gen 2 19 the lifespan it deserves.

It could be argued whether there is any actual added collector's value to the thing being in completely original shape, but what is known is that Gen 2 19's without that mod can crack, and have cracked.


The parts are black I just took that picture with the flash on. The internal parts are the same exact color as the slide stop. I know a dealer that collects Gen 1 and 2 guns and I will let him get a look and see what he thinks. I definitely don’t see any cracked but this gun hasn’t been fired much. Some smileys on the barrel but the barrel Hood is almost perfect, the magwell is pristine, and 2 of the mags look to be unfired.






_______________________________________________
Use thumb-size bullets to create fist-size holes.
 
Posts: 13190 | Location: Charlotte, NC | Registered: May 07, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I have not yet begun
to procrastinate
posted Hide Post
Very nice find!
At that price I don't see how you could go wrong.


--------
After the game, the King and the pawn go into the same box.
 
Posts: 3915 | Location: Central AZ | Registered: October 26, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
As a Masshole, I will say that you should be able to get $50/mag. I’ve seen guys list them for $70 but they don’t sell. The plastic mag bodies make these more desirable than the older SIG mags, because the SIG mag bodies wouldn’t get brittle and break.
 
Posts: 186 | Registered: April 23, 2014Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  SIG Pistols    Question for Massachusetts members...and some Glock 19 porn

© SIGforum 2024