Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply | |
| Left-Handed, NOT Left-Winged! |
It is supposed to be a chassis system like the 320/365 so that means grip modules can be swapped out. I will wager that a paddle release grip module will eventually be available. Paddle releases engage on the spine of the magazine while most button releases engage the sides of the mag. Some truly ambi buttons - or double acting buttons - engage the slide on the spine. From the photos the CC9 mags do not have grooves in the sides so they appear to lock on the spine. That's good because it makes replacement modules with paddles even more likely. | |||
|
Member |
What about a Glock 43X with the Shield Arms grip chop to take their 10 round magazine? "Clear Eyes. Full Hearts. Can't Lose." | |||
|
| Member |
^^^That would be acceptable, but I don’t like having to rely on aftermarket solutions for carry, reliable as they may be. I only use factory equipment for carry guns. As picky as I probably sound, it’s really only because this is an oversaturated market and it allows for that. I’m actually very adaptable. But the reason I’m excited for the CC9 is because I think it’s going to be the final piece of the puzzle to reel in those of us who still haven’t adopted micro-9s. Formerly known as tigerbloodwinning | |||
|
| Member |
Have you tried the Wilson Combat grip module for the P365? I have a standard P365 with WC Grip Module with the weights and I think it’s superb. If I had to go with anything else I’d just go back to a Glock 26.5 or HK P30SK. "Clear Eyes. Full Hearts. Can't Lose." | |||
|
| Member |
Can’t say that I have. But a P365 is generally out of the question for me. I think that its lack of a trigger tab safety is a design flaw. If “flaw” is too harsh, it still at least requires a manual safety for me as a result, which I don’t really want on a micro-9. Even putting aside all of that, SIG’s current QC issues and “profit before anything else” way of doing things make them too untrustworthy for me. I’m not saying the other companies are angels, but again, there are too many other options on the market for me to take current SIG NH products as seriously as I took SIG DE (and older SIG NH) products. Formerly known as tigerbloodwinning | |||
|
Member |
My reading of some articles shows that this gun is the first gun HK wholly made in the USA. Apparently, 5 years of research, design and testing all in the USA. https://www.gunsamerica.com/di...icro-compact-market/ I don't know whether or not it will have any teething problems, but to speak about the subject of teething problems.... If early guns teething problems means they're forever haunted by that .....-> My early gen 3 Glock 32 357SIG broke the pins holding the locking block while at the range, making it a paper weight and useless if it had been being used for self-defense . I could say this means all Glocks suck, I do use it as an example of why nothing is perfect. Glock fixed it, and with regular maintenance (replacement of the pins around 3k-5K rounds) it won't happen again. Teething problems on early models is a real thing for all manufacturers. Stating only one companies problem while not being aware of the real issues with mass manufactured guns (and products) is ignorance at best, insincere at worst. Also, there may be an issue with this gun being a "FCU" gun. Steyr Arms having the first patent for a "FCU" type gun. SIG beat Steyr Arms when they were sued for patent infringement. https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law /sig-sauer-beats-austrian-gunmakers-patent-infringement-claim Can other companies make their own versions of a FCU based gun without violating the patents of Steyr Arms and now Sig?This message has been edited. Last edited by: Austin228, | |||
|
| Sigforum K9 handler |
Meh. This is sorta like when Mossberg got around to releasing yet another AR15. | |||
|
Military Arms Collector |
This is by far the most generic looking gun. But hey if this is HK's introductory offering to their new US mfg wing then surely things can only go up from here, right? | |||
|
| Member |
P7's are one of the most interesting pistols every produced. Are they a great option for an EDC pistol, IMHO opinion NO! They are a single stack 9x19 so are limited capacity. They can be finicky if you don't properly clean the gas piston i.e. they will lock up hard if you oil it! They heat up right quick so if you want to shoot a few hundred rounds of practice plan on plenty of cool down time after just a few magazines downrange. No interchangeable sights, no RDS mounting etc etc etc. P7's have been well surpassed by more modern pistols. They would be prohibitively expensive to manufacture today. They ARE really cool pistols but there are far more practical handguns produced today. I'm glad I bought the 2 I have when I did, they would be 3-5times as expensive to buy today........ Remember, this is all supposed to be for fun................... | |||
|
Oriental Redneck |
He's talking about THIS. Q | |||
|
E tan e epi tas |
I don't get the love affair with the MP7. In full auto form, yeah fun toy, anemic round, easy to dump a mag on target. As a semi auto or semi auto pistol......MEH. I mean the the real deal is kinda meh to me. As far as civilian legal versions of PDWs the FN PS90 makes more sense to me. Still a fairly anemic round but at least you have a sci fi looking cool gun, that actually has a stock etc. Anyway, I've never understood the fascination with getting a semi auto MP7. I guess its just the old "I want what I cannot have" at play. NOTE-I am not saying one shouldn't be offered. Hell I think we should be able to buy the real deal. I am just saying it doesn't blow my proverbial kilt up. "Guns are tools. The only weapon ever created was man." | |||
|
| Member |
Of course. We often get that customer, though these days it's primarily about the ARs, AKs, SCARs, Tavors, etc., that we can no longer buy. But every once and awhile the HK fanboy pining for a SP7 version will show up. -MG | |||
|
| Member |
My bad. Hi-Cap 22 magnum equivelants are much less interesting than P-7's IMHO.......... Remember, this is all supposed to be for fun................... | |||
|
Member |
Thank you Sir
______________________________________________ Life is short. It’s shorter with the wrong gun… | |||
|
Quit staring at my wife's Butt |
| |||
|
Honky Lips |
I hope they sell a million of them. But this doesn't do anything my P365x can't and can't do several things the 365 can. | |||
|
| Member |
I'm intrigued. Tested for 5 plus years? I'm in. Carry my 365's but that trigger return spring may go 2k rounds or maybe 50? Kinda a nagging thing. Wonder how many were in the first release? All gone. Wonder how long to fill the next wave? I'm in but not going to do 800plus on gb. Was going to pick up a 365X slide on their sale but going to wait. | |||
|
| Member |
Just out of curiosity, what can the P365 do that the CC9 cannot? Formerly known as tigerbloodwinning | |||
|
Member |
#1 Take up less volume and fit in smaller spaces. #2 Cost less while having a proven track record, i.e., better value. #3 Has OEM mags w/ capacity up to 17 rounds. #4 Option to convert to .380ACP. After that would be the large aftermarket of available holsters, frames, barrels, sights, internal frame components, etc. Some of those may change in the CC9's future but not #1. | |||
|
| Member |
Cost less? I just put one on layaway for $539.99 around the same optics ready P365 are going for in my area. "Clear Eyes. Full Hearts. Can't Lose." | |||
|
| Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 3 4 5 |
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|
© SIGforum 2024