Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
Member |
Hello. I've had a hankering for a HP for while, probably irrationally. First, thoughts on HPs in general? Second, a local seller has two available. Both are 70s-era. One has been magna-ported (by that company) with trigger job and feed ramp job. By the pix, the finish looks significantly better. $400 more. The other is factory stock, finish good but not as nice. Any real-world experience on magnaporting for a full-sized 9mm in terms of performance? Concerns for an HP? These are not particularly historical, and I'll likely look at both this weekend. Please be 100% candid. And I got dibs in case anyone tries to track them down...Thanks! | ||
|
Member |
My preference would be for the non-magnaported pistol. For a magnum caliber, magnaporting - maybe. Nine mm - not so much. As for the finish - that can always be done by someone you choose. For a $400 difference, that would be a really nice redo with some extras too. | |||
|
Member |
Almost exactly my thoughts. I'd rather have an unaltered one, and refinish if I decided it was an improvement. | |||
|
Go ahead punk, make my day |
This one | |||
|
Unapologetic Old School Curmudgeon |
Super sexy pistol. Great shooter, but watch out for some serious hammer bite. Mine was a nice shooter, very accurate, but it bit my hand bad. I replaced the hammer but it was still a bit bitey. Don't weep for the stupid, or you will be crying all day | |||
|
Member |
Watch for the refinishing specials CCR runs (and advertises here) from time to time. I have a P6 they did a beautiful job on. Harshest Dream, Reality | |||
|
Member |
Get the original...they're great pistols with a strong history of accuracy and dependability. Hammer bite happens occasionally for some, but has never been a factor for me in the three I've owned with both types of hammers. Rod 5th Spl Forces, Air Force Bird Dog FAC, lll Corps RVN 69-70.... We enjoy the Bill of Rights by the sacrifices of our veterans; Politicians, Preachers, Educators, Journalists and Community Organizers are beneficiaries, not defenders of our freedoms. | |||
|
Now and Zen |
Another vote for the unaltered one. ___________________________________________________________________________ "....imitate the action of the Tiger." | |||
|
Mr. Waffles |
I like stock pistols ***************************************************** A shepherd must tend his flock....and at times fight off the wolves | |||
|
Member |
Magnaporting a 9mm is like putting a spoiler on a Dodge Neon. It may look cool, but anyone with a clue thinks it's dumb. Get the unaltered one. What, me worry? | |||
|
Member |
ditto on getting the unaltered pistol. I think you'll find the HP one of the best, naturally pointing pistols made. Jerry | |||
|
Member |
Pass on the Magna ported. The $400 would be a great starting point Hp ______________________________________________ Life is short. It’s shorter with the wrong gun… | |||
|
Member |
In maybe a Sigforum first, unanimous opinions. If I get one, it will be the stock version. So, anything in particular I should be looking for, good, bad, ugly when I take a look, including basic disassembly? | |||
|
Bolt Thrower |
I have a pre-T gun, an Inglis, and a modern production, my thoughts on them are favorable. Get the stock BHP. About the only drastic mod I would approve of would be a S&W revolver sight mounted in the slide. | |||
|
Slayer of Agapanthus |
I know little about BHPs but the Israeli surplus that I bought is clover-leaf accurate. Go with the stock. "It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye". The Little Prince, Antoine de Saint-Exupery, pilot and author, lost on mission, July 1944, Med Theatre. | |||
|
3° that never cooled |
| |||
|
Member |
I too would go for the stock one. A magnaported BHP doesn't interest me at all. The later Mark III black plastic/rubber grips tend to do a little better job at keeping your hand further away from the hammer and preventing hammer bite. | |||
|
Oriental Redneck |
Umm, no. BHP is overrated, imo, especially in stock condition. Yes, I get it that it's a classic, and many folks like classics. But, that's where it ends for me. -Trigger sucks. Yes, I know about the mag disconnect. -Tiny safety sucks. -Smooth front and back straps are a no go for me. Any pistol with smooth both front and back straps is a killer for me. Yes, I've owned a few of them years ago. Tried to like them, but no, it didn't happen. Q | |||
|
Member |
These two, I absolutely agree with. Smooth straps are up to the shooter, and didn't bother me at all, nor did I experience hammer bite. Those made in the 1970's can't take +P loads, and most likely won't feed hollowpoints. Buy the stock pistol and get an aftermarket barrel that will do both for you. I hear the trigger can be fixed, but I don't know how much improvement you can buy. As to the safety, I put a bigger one on mine and it didn't help much, since this variation of John Browning's masterpiece has the mainspring (hammer spring?) attached to the safety, with pressure added to the safety lever being the result. All the tricks that made my competition Colt 1911 better, didn't work on the BHP. Still a great pistol, and I'd get another if I found a good one, but then I like the classic stuff. I'll never give up my pre-war Walther PPK, for instance, which despite the heavy trigger and anemic caliber, I prefer over any of the newer small pistols. -------------------------- Every normal man must be tempted, at times, to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats. -- H L Mencken I always prefer reality when I can figure out what it is. -- JALLEN 10/18/18 | |||
|
Member |
These are much of my thoughts, I had a forged frame BHP mark III 9mm and once I got a CZ 75 SA, I sold the hipower as it feels and shoots so much better, I never warmed up to the boxy hipower grip or very short trigger reach. However, I kept and do seem to like my BHP .40 caliber mark III for some reason. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |