SIGforum
Glock 39 GAP: Seeking Opinions... Not Hatred!

This topic can be found at:
https://sigforum.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/430601935/m/7080005015

August 28, 2024, 02:15 PM
1KPerDay
Glock 39 GAP: Seeking Opinions... Not Hatred!
quote:
Originally posted by Bulldog7972:
quote:
Originally posted by Broadside:
When I think of the .45 GAP I think of a missed opportunity in the firearms world.

Glock’s .45 GAP pistol is built of the same frames for the 9mm/.40S&W/.357Sig models. When you do side by side comparisons you see that the slides of the .45 GAP pistols are slightly thicker than the others.

In my opinion, this is where Glock missed the mark. What Glock should have done was use the .45 GAP slide for the .40S&W cartridge. The additional mass of the slide would have mitigated many of the problems that arose on the .40cal pistols. It would have also put the perceived recoil of the Glock 22 very close to the Glock 17.


Isn't that what they did with the Gen 5 22 and 23 ?
Yes


---------------------------
My hovercraft is full of eels.
August 28, 2024, 09:59 PM
FenderBender
As a 357sig fan, I've only ever owned a glock 32, my question is why? The 45GAP is how I'd define a flop cartridge.


___________________________
The point is, who will stop me?
August 30, 2024, 10:08 PM
copaup
If you want an interesting piece of firearms history, then you could do a lot worse. If you are looking for a practical carry gun you could do a lot better. Nothing wrong with the gun itself, but if you don't reload the ammo options are limited and getting more so.
September 01, 2024, 04:04 AM
bubbatime
I just checked Target Sports USA, my favorite ammo dealer and they only have one ammo in stock, S&B FMJ, for $640 a case.

Ouch.


______________________________________________________
Often times a very small man can cast a very large shadow
September 01, 2024, 02:16 PM
usncorpsman
I owned the full sized and subcompact 45 GAP. I had the subcompact milled for a red dot and it was a beast. I ultimately sold both. They were easy to shoot with low recoil.

Like stated above, if you don’t reload , ammo is expensive. I reloaded for mine. If you pick one up and need brass, I have hundreds of pieces of once fired brass that I would send you.
September 01, 2024, 09:01 PM
egregore
quote:
I just checked Target Sports USA, my favorite ammo dealer and they only have one ammo in stock, S&B FMJ, for $640 a case.

Ouch.

Even for 1000, ouch is right. If a case is 500 rounds, extra ouch.
September 02, 2024, 05:47 PM
RR
quote:
Originally posted by patw:
Unless you reload for it, to me, it is a solution looking for a problem. Ammo is expensive, compared to 45 acp and cannot be found easily in most stores. From what I have researched/found online, a case of fmj ammo will run you around $600 and JHP ammo is even more. I have never fired one but I would wonder about how stout the recoil would be from a small gun like that and the ability of follow up shots. I had a Glock 36 and it was a handful.

Although not a carry gun in size comparatively, the Glock 21 Short (Slim) Frame would be a better choice if I were looking to get a Glock in .45 caliber.

9mm JHP ammo has come a long way and I don't feel the least bit under-gunned so to speak.


Recoil from a model 39 shouldn’t be bad. They were used by a bunch of agencies on the east coast for a while. I’ve put quite a few rounds through the full size model 37 but don’t recall if I’ve fired the model 39.
September 02, 2024, 06:11 PM
taguin
I used the 37 about 20 yrs ago. Not a bad gun. I had a 38 as a back up gun. I kept the complete 37 upper as part of a multi caliber gun option. I don't remember anything going wrong with either one. Ammo was the only thing that kept me back.
September 03, 2024, 03:51 PM
Broadside
quote:
Originally posted by 1KPerDay:
quote:
Originally posted by Bulldog7972:
quote:
Originally posted by Broadside:
When I think of the .45 GAP I think of a missed opportunity in the firearms world.

Glock’s .45 GAP pistol is built of the same frames for the 9mm/.40S&W/.357Sig models. When you do side by side comparisons you see that the slides of the .45 GAP pistols are slightly thicker than the others.

In my opinion, this is where Glock missed the mark. What Glock should have done was use the .45 GAP slide for the .40S&W cartridge. The additional mass of the slide would have mitigated many of the problems that arose on the .40cal pistols. It would have also put the perceived recoil of the Glock 22 very close to the Glock 17.


Isn't that what they did with the Gen 5 22 and 23 ?
Yes


Really?!? I have not seen a Gen 5 in person.

Does this mean that the Gen5 22 and 23 won't fit in a Glock 17/19 holster?