quote:

Originally posted by sourdough44:
I think one should put the Lehigh Defense offerings into the mix when it comes to max performance. One can load themselves or buy loaded ammo.

There may not be a bunch of real world uses yet, but testing is somewhat impressive. Most are basically a lighter copper bullet, no need to mushroom.

I have a variety of solid copper stuff that I carry in 9mm, 10mm, .357, and .45. My wife's woods gun is my Gen 5 G19 full of G9 copper solids, because it's what she can shoot effectively. Not the world's best bear gun but should be adequate for kitties.

For a hunting sidearm in my state, we're allowed to carry any projectile that is "designed by its manufacturer to create a large wound channel larger than the bullet's diameter." So, no hard cast lead if you have any intention of shooting a game animal with it. For that reason, I will be arming myself with either my G40 MOS or my Freedom Arms .357 loaded with either Lehighs or G9s as we get into big game/trophy game seasons here.

Going back to the original post. a 255-grain hard-cast lead bullet out of a Sig P220 is going to be one helluva pistol to control in rapid fire. Try shooting a full magazine of 230-grain +P from a draw into a 3-in circle at seven yards in under two or three seconds. Hitting a charging bear in the brain pan won't be easy. A 100-percent steel .45 with a five-inch barrel would probably be a tad easier to control and make hits.

It seems like some will carry a 10mm up in Alaska. Talk to the locals. Hard-cast lead does penetrate bone well. 10mm cast lead stuff generates nearly 300 foot pounds of energy more than a .45 ACP. FMJ bullets sometimes slide off a skull plate of a horse or cow in .45 ACP. (I've not tackled a bear with one, PTL!) The lead seems to drill in even if hit at an angle. Conventional hollow points sometimes break up on the bone and don't penetrate.

quote:

Originally posted by somerled:
Going back to the original post. a 255-grain hard-cast lead bullet out of a Sig P220 is going to be one helluva pistol to control in rapid fire. Try shooting a full magazine of 230-grain +P from a draw into a 3-in circle at seven yards in under two or three seconds. Hitting a charging bear in the brain pan won't be easy. A 100-percent steel .45 with a five-inch barrel would probably be a tad easier to control and make hits.

It seems like some will carry a 10mm up in Alaska. Talk to the locals. Hard-cast lead does penetrate bone well. 10mm cast lead stuff generates nearly 300 foot pounds of energy more than a .45 ACP. FMJ bullets sometimes slide off a skull plate of a horse or cow in .45 ACP. (I've not tackled a bear with one, PTL!) The lead seems to drill in even if hit at an angle. Conventional hollow points sometimes break up on the bone and don't penetrate.

I didn't think the 255gr Underwoods were that bad on the recoil out of my P220 Compact. I'm positive I could deliver 6 or 7 rounds accurately and faster out of it than I could out of my big-bore magnum revolvers.

Bullet profile and construction definitely matters. That wide, flat meplat on a SWC or cast flat point cuts through stuff without glancing off. On the downside, those profiles don't always feed as reliably in the semi-autos, which is one of the arguments for a revolver.

Used up another batch of Milk jugs today.



First was the 155gr Underwood .44 Mag load out of the 16" Marlin 1894. This chronographed at 1584fps out of the rifle, so about 300fps faster than the revolvers. Interestingly it didn't penetrate as far. Not sure if maybe it was just an anomaly since I'm working with a sample size of one shot per firearm, or if it was becasue the bullet's nose deformed more at the higher impact velocity so it slowed down faster. The gas check separated at the first jug behind the board, and I recovered the bullet at 48 inches.

Unfortunately, I'm going to have to start over with the .44 testing because Underwood discontinued the 255gr Keith Hard Cast that I was testing, and I don't have any more .

The next bullet I tested was the Buffalo Bore 158gr Outdoorsman load. I shot this (and the other .38s) out of an S&W 642-2 with 1 7/8" barrel. They chronograph at 1050fps out of this gun. It penetrated to 32", but it must have tumbled on impact, because while the .44s just punched right through the board, this one tore the hell out of the backside (the gaping hole at the top left, compared to the other holes that are .44s and .45s). I was pretty impressed with this one for a .38 Spcl load out of a snubby.




This revolver hits to point of aim with 110gr bullets, so I decided to try a couple of loads with those as well. The first load was a 110gr Hornady Critical Defense .38 Special (non +p) load. It chronographs at 785fps out of this gun. This stuff sucks. I realize its not intended to be a heavy penetrating load, but its performance was horrible. It made it though the denim and the first jug and then embedded itself in the board. I'd never consider using this as a woods load, but after seeing this I wouldn't even use it for people. Overall penetration was 6".




The last load I tested was my own 110gr XTP .38 Special +P Handload. I'm using Power Pistol which is kinda flashy but consistent, and pushes these at 952fps out of the snubby. I got 18" with these, which I'm ok with for their intended use.

Final results to-date:

Underwood 255gr .45 ACP +P out of P220 Compact at 903fps: 53"
Underwood 255Gr SWC .44 Mag out of 2 3/4" S&W Model 69 at 1177 fps: 65"
Underwood 255Gr SWC .44 Mag out of 4.1" S&W Model 329PD at 1274 fps: 64"
Underwood 255Gr SWC .44 Mag out of 16" Marlin 1894 at 1584 fps: 48"
Buffalo Bore 158gr SWC .38 +P out of 1 7/8" S&W 642 at 1050fps: 32"
Hornady 110gr Critical Defense out of 1 7/8" S&W 642 at 785 fps: 6"
Hornady 110gr XTP Handload out of 1 7/8" S&W 642 at 952 fps: 18"


Oh, and penetration aside, the difference in energy delivery between the .38 and .44 is pretty spectacular. The .38 puches holes, or maybe splits the jug a bit. The .44 does this:

Nice day, no work, more milk jugs...we're back to this again.

I know I started this looking for a viable alternative to a 10mm, and I still don't have one, so I decided to try a .40.

I also decided to try a wadcutter target load, because I've heard that they can be pretty impressive due to the bullet shape. I brought along 3 guns for that....642 with a 1 7/8" barrel, a Model 60 with a 3" barrel, and a Model 66 with a 4" barrel.

Finally, I shot it with an HST, just to see how a typical anti-personnel defensive load stacks up to our test criteria.

Results were as follows:

180gr .40 S&W Hard Cast out of a P229 at 1088fps: 33"

148gr Wadcutter out of a S&W 642 (1 7/8") at 741fps: 7" (Penetrated denim, first jug, and board but bounced off the second jug)

148gr Wadcutter out of a S&W 60 (3") at 797fps: 12"

148gr Wadcutter out of a S&W 66 (4") at 864fps: 28"

Federal HST 124gr out of a P320 Compact at 1066fps: 6" It penetrated the denim and the first jug but embedded itself in the board.

I thought the HST was an interesting benchmark. Obviously it's not designed for massive penetration, and it's documented to be a very capable defensive round. But if it's only getting to the board in this test, the performance of the deeper penetrators in this test is pretty impressive.

A few photos:

148gr Wadcutter out of the 642...went through the board and bounced off the second jug.



HST turned sideways and embedded in the plywood:



Recovered bullets, left to right: HST, Model 66 Wadcutter, Model 60 Wadcutter, 642 Wadcutter, .40 S&W. It appears the wadcutters deformed a bit more the faster they were going, and the extra ~65fps from the 4" tube made a significant difference in the target.

quote:

Originally posted by somerled:
Going back to the original post. a 255-grain hard-cast lead bullet out of a Sig P220 is going to be one helluva pistol to control in rapid fire. Try shooting a full magazine of 230-grain +P from a draw into a 3-in circle at seven yards in under two or three seconds. Hitting a charging bear in the brain pan won't be easy. A 100-percent steel .45 with a five-inch barrel would probably be a tad easier to control and make hits.

I admit to having zero experience shooting at a charging bear in the brain pan

However I have found the need to defend my life with my issued SIG P220. Our issue ammunition was federal Hydrashock, 45ACP 230 grain +P.

I turned behind a shopping center one evening to see what a van was doing there. The two youts began shooting as soon as they say me. I hunkered down right away. Not sure how I drew my sidearm, but I did put four rounds of ammunition through the windshield of my Dodge K car leathly striking each of the perpetrators. I could not tell you what the time frame was, it seemed incredibly long but I am certain it was just a few number of seconds.

Now I have had more practice than most. My first semi-automatic handgun was a 45ACP model 1911 and that was back in 1977. I have put well in excess of 100,000 rounds of 45 ACP downrange over the years. While my target guns were mostly 1911s, when the choice is mine, my defensive side arm has been the 45 ACP SIG P220 since 1978 and still is today if I can carry a large sidearm.

When I need to be much more discreet I will often pocket carry my Boberg 45



Thanks to the bullpup design of this pistol it actually has a barrel length of 3.75"

I would much rather have a single hit with a 230 grain 45ACP Hollow Point then to catch a double tap with a 9MM projectile half that weight