quote:

Originally posted by RobC2:

quote:

Originally posted by ...

The entire thing looks like it was written by an idiot. And I hope Parabellum smacks down this entire post and user.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: parabellum,

Did you click on the yellow triangle to report it?

quote:

Originally posted by ...

Fortunately, this is a public forum. Otherwise I'd peel the paint off your post (and something else) with words unfit for public consumption.

You've got balls suggesting my analysis aligns me with "complaints" you are trolling for in your chosen "profession" (tort lawyer). Also for using the Sig Forum to steer business to your lawfirm. My post was not a "complaint", it was simply a summary of where Sig currently is regarding the P320 platform.

Pardon the brevity of this response. Rather than take time to include some favorite lawyer jokes, I wanted to make my position clear before Para (owner) gives you the heave ho and locks/deletes the thread.

Have a nice day sleazeball.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: parabellum,

Where are the S/F Lawyers to tell us how a lawyer has gotta make a living on 5 martini lunches and such....

P320 owners would likely get $3.57 in ‘damages’ after it’s all said and done.

Sleazeball is right.

Bottom feeder removed, thread sanitized.

Carry on

Thank you.

They wanted to catch up on 556XI kits first.

quote:

Originally posted by az4783054:
Did you click on the yellow triangle to report it?

Yes, they did. See how that works?

For the cost of all the conversion kits, etc, one might as well just buy another pistol. The FCU versatility certainly opens up all kinds of options, but the cost is close enough that barring a really great deal on an upper, used pistols are plentiful and a much better deal.

What's particularly useful about the modularity of the line is the ability to have cheap, plentiful frames with numerous options, and the ability to yank the whole FCU for cleaning and lubrication.

quote:

Originally posted by sns3guppy:
For the cost of all the conversion kits, etc, one might as well just buy another pistol. The FCU versatility certainly opens up all kinds of options, but the cost is close enough that barring a really great deal on an upper, used pistols are plentiful and a much better deal.

What's particularly useful about the modularity of the line is the ability to have cheap, plentiful frames with numerous options, and the ability to yank the whole FCU for cleaning and lubrication.

The price point of a conversion kit would have to be ridiculously low to appeal to me; I'd much rather have two pistols than one pistol with two possible iterations. I'm very frequently out of step with the rest of the world, though.

The ability to easily remove the FCU for cleaning, etc, is the part that appeals to me.

Where I'm looking at it is grabbing a X-Carry. With that it allows me to:
- Stick a Romeo 1 on it. Been wanting to try a pistol optic.
- Slap it in a sub compact frame for low profile carry in summer.
- Use it as is.

All it cost me is the Romeo for $300 & $50 for sub compact frame. Allows me a lot of different possibilities.

But yes if you are trying to get 26 different configurations. You probably could have just bout 5 or more guns. Then just have more guns to shoot.