How do you like the Vickers/Tango Down slide stop? I like the looks of it as it seems to be a nice bridge between the standard and extended Glock. For me, the standard is usable but I'd like it to be a bit bigger. The extended is too big for my tastes.
I have them on all 6 of my glocks it's the first thing I change out, they are perfect for me, I also put the Wilson Vickers combat sights with the gold dot in front and the u shape in back. highly recommend them, the gold bead in front just draws my eyes right to it.
I've had one on every Glock I've owned. I recommend you at least give one a try and develop your own conclusions, but I think it's much better than factory.
______________________________________________ Carthago delenda est
Don't own a Vickers Glock, but did install a Vickers/Tango Down slide stop in my Gen4 G19.
It's an exercise in elegant simplicity. Adds no bulk whatsoever. I use the slide stop to release the slide on all of my pistols. The Vickers is 100%, while the OEM would occasionally fail to release, especially at speed.
______________________ An expert is one who knows more and more about less and less until he knows absolutely everything about nothing. --Nicholas Murray Butler
Posts: 4670 | Location: Pennsylvania | Registered: June 29, 2006
I cant use any of the extended slide releases because of an amputated finger on my support hand. A buddy of mine loves it though and says its a good in between.
For ME: DA/SA=Sig 9mm or HK P30 LEM 9 Striker fired= Glock 9mm If it's a .45= 1911 Suppressed= HK in .45 I like anything in 10mm
Posts: 1475 | Location: VA | Registered: July 29, 2007
I have the Glock extended catch on my 32 and recently shot a friend's 19 with the LV catch. I like his more. I think the texture on it is more aggressive and the way the whole thing is angled out a bit seems like a better design.
Posts: 2234 | Location: New Hampshire | Registered: February 25, 2007
I like them, but the reason is not relevant to actual shooting.
I cannot get the slide of a glock to drop reliably on an empty magazine with the standard slide stop. With the Vickers, I can, so it make administrative handling a little easier. Beyond that, I dont see the need. It is a nicely made part.
***************************** "I don't own the night, I only operate a small franchise" - Author unknown
Posts: 2465 | Location: Texas | Registered: September 27, 2004
I don't like them, but it's a "me" issue, not an issue with the part
I have really big hands and really long thumbs and with a thumbs forward grip I will depress the Vickers slide stop about half the time stopping the slide from locking back on an empty magazine
FWIW, I have the same problem with the glock extended one, and with berettas and sigs, etc
The part itself is well made, and I think I would prefer it to the glock factory part if either worked for me
——————————————————
If the meek will inherit the earth, what will happen to us tigers?
Posts: 7796 | Location: Warrenton, VA | Registered: July 09, 2005
I like it. But I have "ridden" it before causing the gun to not lock back. It's kind of annoying that none of the Vickers stuff comes installed in the gun. Everything is pretty easy to install except for the mag release which can be a pain.
_______________________________________________ Use thumb-size bullets to create fist-size holes.