SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  SIG Pistols    German Army searching for new service pistol
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
German Army searching for new service pistol Login/Join 
Member
posted
Interesting:



"...the BAAINBw’s (the Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support) announcement notes that the selection will be 100% based on unit price. The three most economical offers will be invited to negotiations.

There are additional restrictions on which vendors can submit bids to the competition. A prospective vendor must have a pistol which has been “introduced in a quantity of over 5000 pistols in the military sector of a NATO state in the last five years or be about to be introduced (award already awarded).” This may for instance make the Walther PDP, which recently won a German Special Forces contract for just over 5,000 pistols (as the P14 / P14K), eligible to compete in the tender.

Most intriguingly, however, is the stipulation that: “There are no plans to carry out comparative testing. Any requirements will be verified at the latest with the integrated verification. However, these must be confirmed in advance by self-declarations and, where necessary, by own test reports.”


https://www.thefirearmblog.com...vice-pistol-44819173
 
Posts: 228 | Registered: July 10, 2018Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Prepared for the Worst, Providing the Best
Picture of 92fstech
posted Hide Post
So basically, they're asking for the cheapest crap possible that another NATO military has purchased over 5000 of? Seems like a great way to make a procurement decision Roll Eyes.

What pistol are they currently using?
 
Posts: 9821 | Location: In the Cornfields | Registered: May 25, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
"The new pistol will replace the P8, P8 Combat and P8A1s currently in service. The Heckler & Koch USP was adopted as the P8 in 1994."
 
Posts: 228 | Registered: July 10, 2018Reply With QuoteReport This Post
SIGForum Official Hand Model
Picture of ThankGod4Sig
posted Hide Post
PDP would be a great weapon for them. Helsinki Finland PD uses then. Two officers that stopped me when I was flying a drone of the presidential palace were cool and we discussed them in length. They loved them.


"da evil Count Glockula."-Para
 
Posts: 7944 | Location: C-bus, Ohio | Registered: December 17, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Peace through
superior firepower
Picture of parabellum
posted Hide Post
The PDP would be most appropriate, given the Bundeswehr's history with the P-38. The PDP is the lineal descendant of the P99, the pistol which revitalized Walther beginning in the mid to late 1990s.

P99 / PPQ / PDP
 
Posts: 110774 | Registered: January 20, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
SIGForum Official Hand Model
Picture of ThankGod4Sig
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by parabellum:
The PDP would be most appropriate, given the Bundeswehr's history with the P-38. The PDP is the lineal descendant of the P99, the pistol which revitalized Walther beginning in the mid to late 1990s.

P99 / PPQ / PDP




Have you got a chance to shoot the PDP and the PDP-F yet Para?

They are awesome.


"da evil Count Glockula."-Para
 
Posts: 7944 | Location: C-bus, Ohio | Registered: December 17, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I think it’ll be the PDP. And I think the PDP is a terrific choice. But there still isn’t a single polymer pistol out there with an overall quality equal to the legendary USP.


Formerly known as tigerbloodwinning
 
Posts: 491 | Registered: April 14, 2018Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Curious that the selection will be 100% based on price.
 
Posts: 228 | Registered: July 10, 2018Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Peace through
superior firepower
Picture of parabellum
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ThankGod4Sig:
Have you got a chance to shoot the PDP and the PDP-F yet Para?
No, but I have several P99s and several PPQs.
 
Posts: 110774 | Registered: January 20, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Since the PDP passed their Special Forces testing, which (presumably) had more severe criteria than that for a general service pistol, the Germans know that the basic design is sound and a safe bet. According to the article, they don't plan to do any comparative testing among the guns submitted for this contract, but choose a winner based solely on price. Maybe this is reading too much between the lines, but sounds like it's possible that they already have their preference and they're citing cost as a nudge to get a decent price from Walther.

Of course, Glock/Beretta/HK/Steyr may put up a decent challenge.
 
Posts: 228 | Registered: July 10, 2018Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
G17 perhaps. If adopted by a NATO member in the past five years, it is eligible. Primary test is the unit price; wish they would do full blown tests before adoption, that would be interesting reading. Never handled a PDP, but almost went for a PPQ several years back.
 
Posts: 3563 | Location: Fairfax Co. VA | Registered: August 03, 2015Reply With QuoteReport This Post
E tan e epi tas
Picture of cslinger
posted Hide Post
I would put money on the PDP.
-It was adopted by their SOF guys
-It’s home grown
-The testing has been done so to speak

Glock 17 is a solid contender as well but I would bet it will be some flavor of PDP.

Now the wildcard is the VP9A1. Those new VP9s were build very specifically for a contract. I don’t know how many VP’s have been adopted, nor do I know if the A1’s are considered “new pistols” but I have no doubt those A1 VP9’s were built for a very specific reason.

I’ve shot P99s and PPQ’s and they are wonderful shooters. I’ve not shot a PDP but I really like the 3.5 inch -F model.


Take Care, Shoot Safe,
Chris
 
Posts: 8091 | Location: On the water | Registered: July 25, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
His diet consists of black
coffee, and sarcasm.
Picture of egregore
posted Hide Post
quote:
German Army searching for new service pistol

Glock 7? Smile
 
Posts: 29401 | Location: Johnson City, TN | Registered: April 28, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Wonder if SIG would have the cajones to submit the P320/M17...considering that the Germans did momentarily toss Cohen in the slammer for the so-called "war zone violation" debacle in Colombia.

Anyways, I would think that the Glock 17 would be submitted. Walther may have the inside track with the PDP, but I wouldn't count Heckler & Koch out. That said, Lithuania is the only NATO country that uses a version of the VP9, the SFP9 SF. Would they have done an order for 5000+? The actual number is not publicly known info, but the original order has been described in various gun media articles as "significant", and the HK SFP9 SF procurement is intended to replace all previous sidearms that were in Lithuanian service, including the Glock 17, HK USP and Colt 1911. But how many pistols would they actually need for a military that has according to Wikipedia approximately 23,000 active personnel in total?


-MG
 
Posts: 2315 | Location: The commie, rainy side of WA | Registered: April 19, 2020Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by egregore:
quote:
German Army searching for new service pistol

Glock 7? Smile


Do you know how much that costs? More than you make in a month!


______________________________________________________________________
"When its time to shoot, shoot. Dont talk!"

“What the government is good at is collecting taxes, taking away your freedoms and killing people. It’s not good at much else.” —Author Tom Clancy
 
Posts: 8761 | Location: Attempting to keep the noise down around Midway Airport | Registered: February 14, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves lives
posted Hide Post
The traditional european military military pistol requirement has been to procure a weapon capable of allowing their officers to defend themselves from their own men, and occasionally execute a prisoner. Thus the Luger, makarov, tokarev, nagant 1895 etc.

As such, literally anything will do.


*****************************
"I don't own the night, I only operate a small franchise" - Author unknown
 
Posts: 2482 | Location: Texas | Registered: September 27, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 92fstech:
So basically, they're asking for the cheapest crap possible that another NATO military has purchased over 5000 of? Seems like a great way to make a procurement decision Roll Eyes.

What pistol are they currently using?


Honestly, given those criteria, it makes sense to me. Buy the cheapest thing that somebody else has already vetted. If it was just the cheapest comer, that would be concerning, but by essentially piggybacking off of another country's choices, they're saving themselves the work and expense of their own trials.

We effectively made the same purchasing decision in the XM17 program, except it took a bunch of proposals and projects to even get to that point, then hold lengthy trials, and then buy the cheapest option anyway.
 
Posts: 5307 | Location: Iowa | Registered: February 24, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
IIRC, Glock was upset because SIG won the award without going through the normal endurance and environmental testing.
 
Posts: 228 | Registered: July 10, 2018Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
But does Walther want to keep the business bad enough to underbid, say, Glock?
 
Posts: 3343 | Location: Florence, Alabama, USA | Registered: July 05, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I can't imagine Germany choosing a pistol that is not made in Germany. It would really surprise me if they selected a foreign made one.
 
Posts: 2045 | Registered: March 07, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  SIG Pistols    German Army searching for new service pistol

© SIGforum 2025