Well this is something different from them, I don't think they've ever done a striker-fired pistol before?
If you are just here to shit on KT products, please keep moving...
quote:
The KelTec P15 is a striker-fired, polymer pistol that weighs only 14oz and boasts a 15+1 capacity right out of the box. It’s the lightest, thinnest double-stack 9mm handgun on the market. The P15 is an excellent choice for concealed carry. This pistol offers plenty of dependable firepower to secure your world.
Posts: 9529 | Location: Somewhere looking for ammo that nobody has at a place I haven't been to for a pistol I couldn't live without... | Registered: December 02, 2014
The KelTec P15 is a striker-fired, polymer pistol that weighs only 14oz and boasts a 15+1 capacity right out of the box. It’s the lightest, thinnest double-stack 9mm handgun on the market. The P15 is an excellent choice for concealed carry. This pistol offers plenty of dependable firepower to secure your world.
Hmmm. I wonder how it'll compare to a Glock 48 with those Shield mags.
______________________________________________ “There are plenty of good reasons for fighting, but no good reason ever to hate without reservation, to imagine that God Almighty Himself hates with you, too.”
Also read that this is effective replacing the P11, PF9 & P3AT which are all discontinued or slated for end-life.
The P11 and the PF9 I get, but why the P3AT? Seems like a completely different form-factor, and a different caliber. I remember when the P3AT was the .380 to have...did Ruger steal their lunch that bad with the LCP that they're just giving up, or do they have something else in the works? Because this sure doesn't seem like a suitable replacement.
Posts: 9551 | Location: In the Cornfields | Registered: May 25, 2006
KelTec tries things no one else will. That’s a good thing. How the execution in engineering and industrial design are often lacking. I’ve tried owning them twice.
The “innovation” I see here is a return to the grip safety. That could be a better solution than a manual safety on a striker gun
The “innovation” I see here is a return to the grip safety. That could be a better solution than a manual safety on a striker gun
I'll agree with that. I won't carry a gun with a manual safety that I have to manually disengage, but a grip safety, if properly designed, is automatically disengaged when you establish your grip. Best of both worlds, IMO. I've never had a problem with one, although I haven't had much experience with them outside of 1911s and a few XDs.
Posts: 9551 | Location: In the Cornfields | Registered: May 25, 2006
This looks to me like the replacement for the PF9 as someone mentioned before.
quote:
Originally posted by YooperSigs: Lots of Torx head screws! Thats interesting.
That's how Kel-Tec does things; they mold two clamshell-type halves and screw them together with Allen screws. I don't think any other gunmaker does that, do they?
Posts: 35139 | Location: Pennsylvania | Registered: November 12, 2007