SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  SIG Pistols    Will this kit allow reducing the Glock 17 trigger reach distance?
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Will this kit allow reducing the Glock 17 trigger reach distance? Login/Join 
Freethinker
Picture of sigfreund
posted
I’m seeking a way to reduce the reach to the face of a gen 5 Glock 17’s trigger.

Based on the description of this “kit” I assume it will have what I’m looking for, but is there any better alternative?

https://www.midwayusa.com/product/1004281512

Thanks for the replies.




6.4/93.6
 
Posts: 47949 | Location: 10,150 Feet Above Sea Level in Colorado | Registered: April 04, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I swear I had
something for this
posted Hide Post
Those backstraps attach to the back of the frame. They're only going to extend the trigger reach.
 
Posts: 4589 | Location: Kansas City, MO | Registered: May 28, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Freethinker
Picture of sigfreund
posted Hide Post
Umm .... Confused

My understanding is that they replace the standard backstrap, not that they tack onto the original.
From the description on the linked site: "Installing and removing the back straps is a simple procedure ...."




6.4/93.6
 
Posts: 47949 | Location: 10,150 Feet Above Sea Level in Colorado | Registered: April 04, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I think Dan is right, those are overlays. I know they were in Gen 4, I shot mine with no add on.
 
Posts: 3335 | Location: Florence, Alabama, USA | Registered: July 05, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I swear I had
something for this
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by sigfreund:
My understanding is that they replace the standard backstrap, not that they tack onto the original.
From the description on the linked site: "Installing and removing the back straps is a simple procedure ...."


That's how it works for other guns, but this is Glock Perfection (TM) we're talking about. You pull the trigger pin, add the backstrap to the end of the gun, and replace the trigger pin with a longer one that's provided.

If you want to change the trigger reach, you'll have to change the trigger to one that has less take up.
 
Posts: 4589 | Location: Kansas City, MO | Registered: May 28, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I agree with the others, those pieces will increase the distance to the trigger but the beaver tail pieces, I need on my Glocks due to slide bite.

I would look at flat faced trigger of some sort, as they will have a better feel and give you a shorter distance to the trigger., kind of like the Sig P320 flat trigger versions. I just bought one myself from Kineti-Tech. It's amazing the difference of what an angle can do for a trigger.
 
Posts: 7194 | Location: Treasure Coast,Fl. | Registered: July 04, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Peace through
superior firepower
Picture of parabellum
posted Hide Post
If you want the shortest reach possible, you don't want to have any removable backstrap installed.
 
Posts: 110017 | Registered: January 20, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Casuistic Thinker and Daoist
Picture of 9mmepiphany
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by sigfreund:
I’m seeking a way to reduce the reach to the face of a gen 5 Glock 17’s trigger.

I'd recommend taking a look at the Apex Tactical flat triggers




No, Daoism isn't a religion



 
Posts: 14288 | Location: northern california | Registered: February 07, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Freethinker
Picture of sigfreund
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by parabellum:
If you want the shortest reach possible, you don't want to have any removable backstrap installed.

Okay, thanks for all the comments. I didn't have a pistol in hand to look at when I posted the question and just assumed that any adjustments to the trigger reach could go shorter as well as longer.




6.4/93.6
 
Posts: 47949 | Location: 10,150 Feet Above Sea Level in Colorado | Registered: April 04, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Fighting the good fight
Picture of RogueJSK
posted Hide Post
Nope.

A Gen 4 or 5 Glock with no backstraps is effectively the "Small" grip.

Then that set includes four backstraps to make the grip larger: Medium backstraps both with and without beavertail, and Large backstraps both with and without beavertail.

So you can go bigger, but not smaller.
 
Posts: 33427 | Location: Northwest Arkansas | Registered: January 06, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Frangas non Flectes
Picture of P220 Smudge
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RogueJSK:
Then that set includes four backstraps to make the grip larger: Medium backstraps both with and without beavertail, and Large backstraps both with and without beavertail.


To clarify a bit further, the "Medium" backstraps bring the pistol to the stock, barebones Gen 2/3 dimensions. When Rogue says "Small" grip, that is to say the Gen 4 and newer frames by themselves are what the Gen 3 SF or "Short Frame" dimensions were. The Large backstraps are roughly equivalent to what some of the aftermarket beavertails were on Gen 3's.


______________________________________________
“There are plenty of good reasons for fighting, but no good reason ever to hate without reservation, to imagine that God Almighty Himself hates with you, too.”
 
Posts: 17879 | Location: Sonoran Desert | Registered: February 10, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Freethinker
Picture of sigfreund
posted Hide Post
It's good to learn more about all this, but a larger backstrap is definitely not what is needed in this situation.




6.4/93.6
 
Posts: 47949 | Location: 10,150 Feet Above Sea Level in Colorado | Registered: April 04, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Peace through
superior firepower
Picture of parabellum
posted Hide Post
I find Glock's backstrap system to be somewhat flimsy, specifically the way that the backstrap attaches at the top. I wouldn't ever want to rely on this method of attachment.
 
Posts: 110017 | Registered: January 20, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Frangas non Flectes
Picture of P220 Smudge
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by parabellum:
I find Glock's backstrap system to be somewhat flimsy, specifically the way that the backstrap attaches at the top. I wouldn't ever want to rely on this method of attachment.


If their take on the beavertail was the default shape of the frame, I'd happily forego the added backstrap because I also don't find it too confidence-inspiring. I haven't had one come loose or get snagged on something, but all the same, it's just that one pin....


______________________________________________
“There are plenty of good reasons for fighting, but no good reason ever to hate without reservation, to imagine that God Almighty Himself hates with you, too.”
 
Posts: 17879 | Location: Sonoran Desert | Registered: February 10, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
The Quiet Man
posted Hide Post
I'm also in the camp of folks not crazy about the feel of the backstraps. I leave them in the box.

I've found that the slight decrease in size from the original you get with no backstrap makes all the difference in the way the gun feels in my hand.
 
Posts: 2701 | Registered: November 13, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Down the Rabbit Hole
Picture of Jupiter
posted Hide Post
No backstrap with a set of granulate talon grips give me the perfect reach to the trigger. Without the talons, I need to add the medium backstrap.


Diligentia, Vis, Celeritas

"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
-- George Orwell

 
Posts: 4955 | Location: North Mississippi | Registered: August 09, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of gunsmoke92
posted Hide Post
If you're fighting trigger reach, a better solution is to change the trigger shoe. I suffer the same problem, and my solution was to install the PolyDat trigger shoe from Overwatch Precision. It comes with the pin to attach it to the factory trigger bar, since it's a flat trigger and because of its geometry, the distance is shorter. It also functions the same as the OEM part except the safety dingus doesn't rub your finger raw. I wish I could figure out how to post a photo so I could let you see a comparison.


The best defense is a good offense, and I'm really offensive. Wink
 
Posts: 303 | Location: Rigby,ID | Registered: March 20, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Freethinker
Picture of sigfreund
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by gunsmoke92:
trigger shoe from Overwatch Precision.

That looks pretty good and I will probably order one. Thanks.




6.4/93.6
 
Posts: 47949 | Location: 10,150 Feet Above Sea Level in Colorado | Registered: April 04, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  SIG Pistols    Will this kit allow reducing the Glock 17 trigger reach distance?

© SIGforum 2024