One thing I'd love Sig to bring out is a AXG module for the 320 that is exactly like the Sig 226 x5 gun. I love the 226 X5 stainless gun and also a finished stainless slide similar to the 226 X5.

I've wanted that gun for years and just didn't get one now they're $4000 so it not going to happen.
What do you want?

P320 in 10MM. And bring back support for the 45ACP P320.

quote:

Originally posted by YooperSigs:
P320 in 10MM. And bring back support for the 45ACP P320.

This. Less cosmetics. More calibers.

A true subcompact not x compact not the subcompact that was a compact, but a sub compact, with AXG frame too.

A grip safety frame module and a 200 dollar basic FCU instead of the 300 dollar "fancy" one.

quote:

Originally posted by 92fstech:

quote:

Originally posted by YooperSigs:
P320 in 10MM. And bring back support for the 45ACP P320.

This. Less cosmetics. More calibers.

Amen. Less bling. More boom.

I'd like to see a hammer-fired P320.

Cheaper magazines.
You want to beat Glock?, 20-25$ mags instead of $40

quote:

Originally posted by YooperSigs:
P320 in 10MM. And bring back support for the 45ACP P320.

Yes and yes!

quote:

Originally posted by YooperSigs:
P320 in 10MM. And bring back support for the 45ACP P320.

Hear, hear! I'll take a 320F with a manual safety in both flavors, please.

quote:

Originally posted by Jester814:
A grip safety frame module and a 200 dollar basic FCU instead of the 300 dollar "fancy" one.

If only. SIG has a history of pushing "modularity" and then not providing many options in terms of modules AND of pricing their "conversion kits" to the moon and stars. A "basic" FCU with a manual safety (or at least made so that it's easy to add one) would seem like a no-brainer to me.

All stainless in 9mm with a manual safety, flat trigger... and no rail.

More factory comp support outside of the Spectre line. I'd like to be able to buy a well designed factory comp and barrel in black and install them in an existing gun.

They need to figure the damned optics cuts out, too. I think there are five varieties over the years. They need to get one picked and stick with it. It also needs a rear sight dovetail because that is what people expect.

.22 long rifle

How about releasing the many different slides (RMR compatible?), grips (not just Sig as promised) and the new models (like the compensated Specter) so we don't need to buy an entire new 320 every time there is a cosmetic or functional upgrade?

At least do it within a few months. and yes, i get the point that you want us to spend more money. You might make it up in quantity of the parts. I'm not buying more 320's.

I have a FS and C 45 and multiple 9mm's. I am tired of all the "exciting" announcements of "new" 320's when we all have the FCUs already. Wasn't the point to be able to customize our own FCU's to how we want w/o having to go to the "Mastershop" or buy non-existent kits?

And, if I'm going to the Mastershop, it isn't for a new 320 - let/s see some good old-fashioned X-5 and X-6's while you still have some of us alive who appreciate real quality.

I might spend some $$$ for a .22LR Conversion Kit.

I wouldn’t mind a Spectre Comp type gun with an AXG frame. I could live without the TiN and slide holes. One of the guns I was looking at when COVID hit was Parker Mountain Machine’s X5 Double Comp that was about $2200 to build.

15-round compact AXG grip

Compact AXG grip with manual safety cutout and that will take the 320 compact mags so you don't need to buy more mags. That way we could just swap out the grips on any old compact with a safety.

One other thing - it would be nice to see compensated slides, but only if the slide for the Full Size model is actually longer than stock in order to accommodate a full-length barrel and the compensator. Putting a stubbier barrel behind a compensator just seems like working against one's self.

Although I need one like another hole in the head, a couple of long barrel/slide options of 6 inches would be tempting, especially in 357 SIG. For those who can use them optical sights have eliminated the advantage of a longer sight radius, but can’t have too much velocity for no greater pressure cost, can we?