Member
| If you can swing it, keep both. Ramen noodles ain't that bad; that's how I made it through college...all those decades ago...well...maybe a steady diet of the stuff isn't so great, after all.  If one had to go I say stick with the stainless. I've got the P232SL and it's been a keeper even though I really don't feel much love for .380. I was tempted but turned down an offer for a blued P232 not long ago, only because the Stainless is THE permanent SIG resident for that caliber.
-MG
|
| Posts: 1424 | Location: The commie, rainy side of WA | Registered: April 19, 2020 |  
IP
|
|
Honky Lips

| I'd keep the 230 but I'm a late cold war junkie. |
| |
Frangas non Flectes
| I've never owned either, so I'm not sure what my opinion is worth, but I've always thought the P230 SL is the most aesthetically-pleasing pistol Sig ever produced. I still want one, against all reason.
______________________________________________ I believe in the 25th amendment.
|
| Posts: 15435 | Location: Gilbert, AZ | Registered: February 10, 2011 |  
IP
|
|
Member
| Another vote for the P230SL |
| |
Member
| It was my understanding that one of the main differences between the 230 and the 232 was that the 232 had an improved feed ramp for the shooting of hollow points vs the feed ramp of the 230 which is for shooting ball. Intended ammo should be factored in to the decision. |
| |
Member
| I guess it has to do with hand size as well as one's grip but I'm never been bit by my P230... now to stray just a tad, I've loaned my Walther PPK to a friend who is interested in buying it and this past Sunday he showed me the top of his shooting hand with the Walther bite.... |
| Posts: 3482 | Location: Greenville, SC | Registered: January 30, 2017 |  
IP
|
|