Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
E tan e epi tas |
100% agree and be they law enforcement or concealed carrier or home defender and if the fight ends in two shots I am sure at that moment we all want a belt fed at our disposal. I wasn’t really looking for a a person should only carry X rounds or statistics show it will only take 2.9765 rounds kind of thing. I was really just curious as to whether law enforcement had any high profile failure incidents similar to the ones that did occur with revolvers post semi auto adoption no matter the platform. NOTE- I am also not poo poo’ing revolvers. I love revolvers. Thanks all. Good food for thought. Chris "Guns are tools. The only weapon ever created was man." | |||
|
Little ray of sunshine |
Shouldn't we be looking at more recent encounters and not those gunfights from the 1980s (40 years ago) when the cops mostly had revolvers? Since the cops went to autos, my memory doesn't recall any incidents where capacity was a real problem, although I have not done any particular research. The fish is mute, expressionless. The fish doesn't think because the fish knows everything. | |||
|
John has a long moustashe |
Guys at my former agency had a 45 second gunfight at 15 yards with a homicide suspect armed with an AR who was dodging and weaving behind his car that was broadside to the three responding Deputies. One Deputy did empty all three 17-round mags for his P 320. Another Deputy ended it with a buckshot round to the guy's head. The third Deputy took a grazing round to the arm and both cop cars were taken out of commission by the bad guy. Suspect's car was pretty shot up as well. | |||
|
The wicked flee when no man pursueth |
The data is available (up to 2019 at least) from the FBI's LEOKA reports here: https://ucr.fbi.gov/leoka/ There is a description of every single incident. I don't think you're going to find one where the officer's slide is locked back and completely out of ammo (but I could be wrong). Most assaults take place very quickly in a matter of a few seconds. Proverbs 28:1 | |||
|
Member |
Nothing to do with capacity, but Trooper Mark Coates shot a suspect 5x in the chest with his issued 357 Magnum revolver, point blank range. Retreated 6-8 feet away to call it in and the suspect pulled a .22lr derringer from his pocket and fatally shot Coates with that .22lr (1 shot through the arm and into the chest). The suspect survived his injuries and went to prison. This is an example of the strange things that can happen in gun fights. DPR | |||
|
Fighting the good fight |
This is an example of a relatively well-known LE gunfight where the officer fired 33 rounds, going through all three of the magazines and finally putting the bank robber down with just 4 rounds remaining in his Glock 21. (Although, if I were to Monday morning quarterback, I'd point out that most of his first magazine was likely wasted shooting through the windshield from inside his patrol car. We now know from extensive windshield deflection testing that firing through a front windshield is wildly ineffective, deflecting the rounds at a sharp upward trajectory and making it nearly impossible to hit a target that's any further away than standing directly in contact with the hood/front bumper until/unless you manage to port a large enough hole with your previous rounds that the bullets stop being interfered with by the glass... But that can take a lot of bullets.)
| |||
|
The wicked flee when no man pursueth |
Every time this conversation comes up so does this incident. It's by far the the exception from the norm. I certainly understand from the trauma of the incident why he carries what he does, but I think his quote is also very important. There has been a degradation in marksmanship fundamentals in some circles and an emphasis on speed and split-times. Speed and split-times are a double-edged sword (probably a different discussion), but if your hits aren't hitting anything vital then none of them matter. Proverbs 28:1 | |||
|
Fighting the good fight |
Very true. It's an interesting anecdote, but not the norm. (I don't carry anywhere near 145 rounds either.) And things like accuracy, and my aforementioned comments on the ineffectiveness of shooting through a windshield, are definitely factors in this outlier. But it's also important to note that he did manage to score 14 hits - including 6 hits to vital center mass organs like his heart and lungs - and the bad guy was still in the fight until the final 2 shots to the head. That's almost three cylinders of revolver shots that hit the bad guy - with one full cylinder worth to vital center mass organs and another 1/3 of a cylinder to the head - before he went down. (Same math as an ultra compact like a Glock 43 and its 6 round magazines.) Or, to look at it another way, that's two P220/1911 magazines worth of hits - including an entire P220/1911 magazine worth of hits to the head and vital organs - before he was stopped. So even with excellent marksmanship, capacity is certainly still a factor worthy of consideration. | |||
|
Member |
To build off of Rogue's comment, in many of our rural Arkansas counties, deputies in 2023 are STILL often working alone at night. Backup will be the closest off-duty officer asleep in bed who can wake up, get their gear on, and drive to the scene, which might be all the way across the county. Response times in large rural counties could be 45-60 minutes. Officers know this, and that's why I think so many of them choose to carry the highest capacity duty weapons possible. If I were required to go back out on patrol, I'd err on the cautious side with a Gen 5 Glock 17 or Glock 45 9mm with 4 OEM mags with OEM +2 extensions and HST +P. In many cases, including some of those IL cases profiled by Ayoob, attacks are so sudden, you fight with what you have, and often don't have time to get back to the cruiser for an AR or 870. As to the OP's original question, in the current era, I can't think of any incidents where a LEO was taken out of a fight due to weapons capacity or running out of ammo, but there are several close calls. I do believe that high-capacity duty weapons have been shown to be a lifesaving benefit to LE since the transition began in 1990. During a sobriety checkpoint in central Arkansas about a decade ago, I was told by an officer that he'd been ambushed while responding to a call. The barricaded suspect opened fire on the officer with a rifle from deep within the house. Armed with a Glock 22 .40, the officer took cover behind a very large tree and was pinned down. He ran his G22 dry and was tossed spare G22 mags from other responding officers who were behind hard cover. This is one of the only times I've ever heard of an officer running a high capacity pistol dry, and the only time I can recall where magazine commonality played a crucial role in the officer's gunfight. The other LEOs were giving this officer quite a bit of shit. "You telling that story again? You're getting a lot of mileage out of this one." Pretty funny. | |||
|
I swear I had something for this |
Because of the pussies running YouTube and Google, I'm only allowed to post this video instead of embedding it. Clint Smith goes over data from the 80's and 90's above average shots per firefight with LEO's and the jist of the story is they shot until they were empty. https://youtu.be/H3l6BR4YXKY For your CCW, it's up to you. Whatever makes you feel comfortable because you aren't going out in the middle of the night be Frank Castle The Punisher. | |||
|
Member |
"In this free-for-all, the assailant had, in fact, been struck 14 times. Any one of six of these wounds – in the heart, right lung, left lung, liver, diaphragm, and right kidney – could have produced fatal consequences, “in time,” Gramins emphasizes." The problem of gunfights is what we "know" or "think we know" comes from movies and tv. It looks awesome when gets hit with a handgun and there's some cool flashes and smoke, bad guy flies back 10 feet in the air. Somehow, even subconsciously, that seeps into our heads. Heaven forbid, any of you on here experience a gunfight. There's some here that have. It ain't fun. Sometime after that war, squishy feeling between your butt cheeks is gone, you process things. You don't really want to get into a gunfight with a handgun. Even if it does start with a .4... The ability for "immediate" incapacitating an attacker is rather small. Dump 6 rounds of .44 Mag center mass on someone that's motivated, maybe toss in a little PCP, maybe sprinkle a little crazy... It's not going to stop "right now"! There's multiple documented cases where people have been hit in the head, taking out a chunk of the skull and brain, and still functioning for a short period. A lot of stuff can happen in that "short period". (One solider in Vietnam was able to change the barrel and reload his M-60 and return some fire before succumbing to his head wound) You want to stop someone RIGHT NOW- use a larger caliber rifle. As to the OP, one of the incidents off the top of my head is the LA Bank robbery back in the 90's. I'm sure back in the 80'-early 90's during the change from "6 guns" to higher capacity 9mm, there may have been a few incidents. KevH posted an excellent site to research. Unfortunately it only goes back so far. ______________________________________________________________________ "When its time to shoot, shoot. Dont talk!" “What the government is good at is collecting taxes, taking away your freedoms and killing people. It’s not good at much else.” —Author Tom Clancy | |||
|
Member |
Of course there are black swans, but the over-riding factor in winning gun fights is getting good hits, preferably to the pump or CNS. When I go back for my next degree I'll do a multivariate analysis that includes capacity, hits, location of hits and rounds fired. Somehow I managed to survive a career starting in 1984 with a revolver, to a 1911 and on to a P226 | |||
|
"Member" |
Conversely, you'll be hard pressed to find any post shootout after action reports where someone wished they had less ammo. | |||
|
Member |
They exist and while not the norm consider that there are some factors to include, Cops go to stuff together so more guns technically hopefully means less individual reloads if its a gunfight. Cops almost across the board do autoloaders with 17 rds being standard. Bullets and people do really weird stuff and there are no guarantees, even with good hits to the vitals. More opportunities to poke holes in the vitals is always better to raise the chances to stop a fight. Something I'd like to add to the case of Gramins is the need for routine force on force in LE which is not always available (or sometimes sought after). More time on the range is certainly part of the equation but a lot of times people have to settle into a gunfight and accept that its happening to come out of the OHJEEZUS surprise where they try to hose a bad guy down then settle into aiming. I'm a believer in sims and FOF being another part of the solution to give folks a bit more edge in a fight. I run three mags on or off duty. I consider that a minimum, for me, outside of special circumstances. To me, I'd rather have it and not need it. A few rounds is the norm but going to work and going home with nothing happening is the norm too. The gun is for something weird and if that happens then something statistically anomalous can happen during that fight as well. | |||
|
Member |
I just received my CWP her in PA, so I am thinking about what to carry. It is a tough choice I am thinking either a Randall #1 fighting knife or a Springfield Armory XDM in 10mm with three extra 16 round magazines. The plus to the Randall is I never have to worry about hitting an innocent bystander and the plus to the 10mm is I am all set if a Polar bear attacks. No actually I will probably get a SIG 365 XMacro with one or two extra magazines. Rule Number Nine - Always carry a knife. | |||
|
Sigforum K9 handler |
Or scored their hits slower. | |||
|
Member |
Back in the 80's most departments carried revolvers. I know mine did. We were a big city. One time at a competitive shoot at the police range; I brought my Model 52 Smith and Wesson that shot 38 wadcutters and was told I could not use it "no semi autos allowed". We never had a problem with 6 shooters fighting crime. Jeeps...guns...German Shepherds! | |||
|
Member |
There might be someone who had an errant round cause injury or death that wishes he or she had fired fewer rounds more slowly. ____________________ | |||
|
Imagination and focus become reality |
What is the percentage of "hits" by police officers involved in shooting? 20-30%. It seems like more accurate hits are more important than fast misses. | |||
|
E tan e epi tas |
I hear this all the time and while there is absolutely a training aspect the first thing that always pops into my mind when people bring this up is that unless you are EXTREMELY well trained/hardened there is that whole “HOLY SHIT SOMEBODY IS TRYING TO KILL ME!!!” Reaction at work as well. "Guns are tools. The only weapon ever created was man." | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 3 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |