SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  SIG Pistols    How many incidents have there been where an LEO was killed or otherwise taken out of the fight due to weapon capacity?
Page 1 2 3 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
How many incidents have there been where an LEO was killed or otherwise taken out of the fight due to weapon capacity? Login/Join 
E tan e epi tas
Picture of cslinger
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 12131:
Bottom line is, each of us chooses what capacity we're comfortable with and carry on. There is no right or wrong answer, until that moment.. Eek


100% agree and be they law enforcement or concealed carrier or home defender and if the fight ends in two shots I am sure at that moment we all want a belt fed at our disposal. Smile

I wasn’t really looking for a a person should only carry X rounds or statistics show it will only take 2.9765 rounds kind of thing. I was really just curious as to whether law enforcement had any high profile failure incidents similar to the ones that did occur with revolvers post semi auto adoption no matter the platform.

NOTE- I am also not poo poo’ing revolvers. I love revolvers.


Thanks all. Good food for thought.
Chris


"Guns are tools. The only weapon ever created was man."
 
Posts: 8014 | Location: On the water | Registered: July 25, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Little ray
of sunshine
Picture of jhe888
posted Hide Post
Shouldn't we be looking at more recent encounters and not those gunfights from the 1980s (40 years ago) when the cops mostly had revolvers? Since the cops went to autos, my memory doesn't recall any incidents where capacity was a real problem, although I have not done any particular research.




The fish is mute, expressionless. The fish doesn't think because the fish knows everything.
 
Posts: 53411 | Location: Texas | Registered: February 10, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
John has a
long moustashe
Picture of john1
posted Hide Post
Guys at my former agency had a 45 second gunfight at 15 yards with a homicide suspect armed with an AR who was dodging and weaving behind his car that was broadside to the three responding Deputies. One Deputy did empty all three 17-round mags for his P 320. Another Deputy ended it with a buckshot round to the guy's head. The third Deputy took a grazing round to the arm and both cop cars were taken out of commission by the bad guy. Suspect's car was pretty shot up as well.
 
Posts: 610 | Location: Rural NW Oklahoma | Registered: June 16, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
The wicked flee when
no man pursueth
Picture of KevH
posted Hide Post
The data is available (up to 2019 at least) from the FBI's LEOKA reports here:
https://ucr.fbi.gov/leoka/

There is a description of every single incident.

I don't think you're going to find one where the officer's slide is locked back and completely out of ammo (but I could be wrong). Most assaults take place very quickly in a matter of a few seconds.


Proverbs 28:1
 
Posts: 4264 | Location: Contra Costa County, CA | Registered: May 28, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Nothing to do with capacity, but Trooper Mark Coates shot a suspect 5x in the chest with his issued 357 Magnum revolver, point blank range. Retreated 6-8 feet away to call it in and the suspect pulled a .22lr derringer from his pocket and fatally shot Coates with that .22lr (1 shot through the arm and into the chest). The suspect survived his injuries and went to prison. This is an example of the strange things that can happen in gun fights.


DPR
 
Posts: 663 | Registered: March 10, 2015Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Fighting the good fight
Picture of RogueJSK
posted Hide Post
This is an example of a relatively well-known LE gunfight where the officer fired 33 rounds, going through all three of the magazines and finally putting the bank robber down with just 4 rounds remaining in his Glock 21.

(Although, if I were to Monday morning quarterback, I'd point out that most of his first magazine was likely wasted shooting through the windshield from inside his patrol car. We now know from extensive windshield deflection testing that firing through a front windshield is wildly ineffective, deflecting the rounds at a sharp upward trajectory and making it nearly impossible to hit a target that's any further away than standing directly in contact with the hood/front bumper until/unless you manage to port a large enough hole with your previous rounds that the bullets stop being interfered with by the glass... But that can take a lot of bullets.)

quote:
Before the call that changed Timothy Gramins’ life forever, he typically carried 47 rounds of handgun ammunition on his person while on duty.

Now, he carries 145, “every day, without fail.”

Gramins detailed the gunfight that caused the difference in a gripping presentation at the annual conference of the Assn. of SWAT Personnel-Wisconsin in 2012.

At the core of his desperate firefight was a murderous attacker who simply would not go down, even though he was shot 14 times with .45-cal. ammunition – six of those hits in supposedly fatal locations.

The most threatening encounter in Gramins’ nearly two-decade career with the Skokie (Illinois) Police Department north of Chicago came on a lazy August afternoon in 2008 prior to his promotion to sergeant, on his first day back from a family vacation. He was about to take a quick break from his patrol circuit to buy a Star Wars game at a shopping center for his son’s eighth birthday.

An alert flashed out that a male black driving a two-door white car had robbed a bank at gunpoint in another suburb 11 miles north and had fled in an unknown direction. Gramins was only six blocks from a major expressway that was the most logical escape route into the city.

Unknown at the time, the suspect, a 37-year-old alleged Gangster Disciple, had vowed he would kill a police officer if he got stopped.

“I’ve got a horseshoe up my ass when it comes to catching suspects,” Gramins laughs. He radioed that he was joining other officers on the busy expressway lanes to scout traffic.

He was scarcely up to highway speed when he spotted a lone male black driver in a white Pontiac Bonneville and pulled alongside him. “He gave me ‘the Look,’ that oh-crap-there’s-the-police look, and I knew he was the guy,” Gramins said.

Gramins dropped behind him. Then in a sudden, last-minute move the suspect accelerated sharply and swerved across three lanes of traffic to roar up an exit ramp. “I’ve got one running!” Gramins radioed.

The next thing he knew, bullets were flying. “That was four years ago,” Gramins said. “Yet it could be 10 seconds ago.”

With Gramins following close behind, siren blaring and lights flashing, the Bonneville zigzagged through traffic and around corners into a quiet pocket of single-family homes a few blocks from the exit. Then a few yards from where a 10-year-old boy was skateboarding on a driveway, the suspect abruptly squealed to a stop.

“He bailed out and ran headlong at me with a 9 mm Smith in his hand while I was still in my car,” Gramins said.

The gunman sank four rounds into the Crown Vic’s hood while Gramins was drawing his .45-cal. Glock 21.

“I didn’t have time to think of backing up or even ramming him,” Gramins said. “I see the gun and I engage.”

Gramins fired back through his windshield, sending a total of 13 rounds tearing through just three holes.

A master firearms instructor and a sniper on his department’s Tactical Intervention Unit, “I was confident at least some of them were hitting him, but he wasn’t even close to slowing down,” Gramins said.

The gunman shot his pistol dry trying to hit Gramins with rounds through his driver-side window, but except for spraying the officer’s face with glass, he narrowly missed and headed back to his car.

Gramins, also empty, escaped his squad – “a coffin,” he calls it – and reloaded on his run to cover behind the passenger-side rear of the Bonneville.

Now the robber, a lanky six-footer, was back in the fight with a .380 Bersa pistol he’d grabbed off his front seat. Rounds flew between the two as the gunman dashed toward the squad car.

Again, Gamins shot dry and reloaded.

“I thought I was hitting him, but with shots going through his clothing it was hard to tell for sure. This much was certain: he kept moving and kept shooting, trying his damnedest to kill me.”

In this free-for-all, the assailant had, in fact, been struck 14 times. Any one of six of these wounds – in the heart, right lung, left lung, liver, diaphragm, and right kidney – could have produced fatal consequences, “in time,” Gramins emphasizes.

But time for Gramins, like the stack of bullets in his third magazine, was fast running out.

In his trunk was an AR-15; in an overhead rack inside the squad, a Remington 870.

But reaching either was impractical. Gramins did manage to get himself to a grassy spot near a tree on the curbside of his vehicle where he could prone out for a solid shooting platform.

The suspect was in the street on the other side of the car. “I could see him by looking under the chassis,” Gramins recalls. “I tried a couple of ricochet rounds that didn’t connect. Then I told myself, ‘Hey, I need to slow down and aim better.’”

When the suspect bent down to peer under the car, Gramins carefully established a sight picture and squeezed off three controlled bursts in rapid succession.

Each round slammed into the suspect’s head – one through each side of his mouth and one through the top of his skull into his brain. At long last, the would-be cop-killer crumpled to the pavement.

The whole shootout had lasted 56 seconds, Gramins said. The assailant had fired 21 rounds from his two handguns. Inexplicably – but fortunately – he had not attempted to employ an SKS semi-automatic rifle that was lying on his front seat ready to go.

Gramins had discharged 33 rounds. Four remained in his magazine.

Two houses and a parked Mercedes in the vicinity had been struck by bullets, but with no casualties. The young skateboarder had run inside yelling at his dad to call 911 as soon as the battle started and also escaped injury. Despite the fusillade of lead sent his way, Gramins’ only damage besides glass cuts was a wound to his left shin. His dominant emotion throughout his brush with death, he recalls, was “feeling very alone, with no one to help me but myself.”

Remarkably, the gunman was still showing vital signs when EMS arrived. Sheer determination, it seemed, kept him going, for no evidence of drugs or alcohol was found in his system.

He was transported to a trauma center where Gramins also was taken. They shared an ER bay with only a curtain between them as medical personnel fought unsuccessfully to save the robber’s life.

At one point Gramins heard a doctor exclaim, “We may as well stop. Every bag of blood we give him ends up on the floor. This guy’s like Swiss cheese. Why’d that cop have to shoot him so many times!”

Gramins thought, “He just tried to kill me! Where’s that part of it?”

When Gramins was released from the hospital, “I walked out of there a different person,” he said.

“Being in a shooting changes you. Killing someone changes you even more.” As a devout Catholic, some of his changes involved a deepening spirituality and philosophical reflections, he said without elaborating.

At least one alteration was emphatically practical.

Before the shooting, Gramins routinely carried 47 rounds of handgun ammo on his person, including two extra magazines for his Glock 21 and 10 rounds loaded in a backup gun attached to his vest, a 9 mm Glock 26.

Now unfailingly he goes to work carrying 145 handgun rounds, all 9 mm. These include three extra 17-round magazines for his primary sidearm (currently a Glock 17), plus two 33-round mags tucked in his vest, as well as the backup gun. Besides all that, he’s got 90 rounds for the AR-15 that now rides in a rack up front.

Paranoia?

Gramins shook his head and said “Preparation.”
 
Posts: 33431 | Location: Northwest Arkansas | Registered: January 06, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
The wicked flee when
no man pursueth
Picture of KevH
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RogueJSK:
This is a relatively famous LE gunfight where the officer fired 33 rounds through all three of the magazines from his Glock 21, finally putting the bank robber down with just 4 rounds remaining:

quote:



Then I told myself, ‘Hey, I need to slow down and aim better.’”



Every time this conversation comes up so does this incident. It's by far the the exception from the norm.

I certainly understand from the trauma of the incident why he carries what he does, but I think his quote is also very important.

There has been a degradation in marksmanship fundamentals in some circles and an emphasis on speed and split-times. Speed and split-times are a double-edged sword (probably a different discussion), but if your hits aren't hitting anything vital then none of them matter.


Proverbs 28:1
 
Posts: 4264 | Location: Contra Costa County, CA | Registered: May 28, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Fighting the good fight
Picture of RogueJSK
posted Hide Post
Very true. It's an interesting anecdote, but not the norm. (I don't carry anywhere near 145 rounds either.) And things like accuracy, and my aforementioned comments on the ineffectiveness of shooting through a windshield, are definitely factors in this outlier.

But it's also important to note that he did manage to score 14 hits - including 6 hits to vital center mass organs like his heart and lungs - and the bad guy was still in the fight until the final 2 shots to the head.

That's almost three cylinders of revolver shots that hit the bad guy - with one full cylinder worth to vital center mass organs and another 1/3 of a cylinder to the head - before he went down. (Same math as an ultra compact like a Glock 43 and its 6 round magazines.)

Or, to look at it another way, that's two P220/1911 magazines worth of hits - including an entire P220/1911 magazine worth of hits to the head and vital organs - before he was stopped.

So even with excellent marksmanship, capacity is certainly still a factor worthy of consideration.
 
Posts: 33431 | Location: Northwest Arkansas | Registered: January 06, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
To build off of Rogue's comment, in many of our rural Arkansas counties, deputies in 2023 are STILL often working alone at night. Backup will be the closest off-duty officer asleep in bed who can wake up, get their gear on, and drive to the scene, which might be all the way across the county. Response times in large rural counties could be 45-60 minutes. Officers know this, and that's why I think so many of them choose to carry the highest capacity duty weapons possible.

If I were required to go back out on patrol, I'd err on the cautious side with a Gen 5 Glock 17 or Glock 45 9mm with 4 OEM mags with OEM +2 extensions and HST +P. In many cases, including some of those IL cases profiled by Ayoob, attacks are so sudden, you fight with what you have, and often don't have time to get back to the cruiser for an AR or 870.

As to the OP's original question, in the current era, I can't think of any incidents where a LEO was taken out of a fight due to weapons capacity or running out of ammo, but there are several close calls. I do believe that high-capacity duty weapons have been shown to be a lifesaving benefit to LE since the transition began in 1990.

During a sobriety checkpoint in central Arkansas about a decade ago, I was told by an officer that he'd been ambushed while responding to a call. The barricaded suspect opened fire on the officer with a rifle from deep within the house. Armed with a Glock 22 .40, the officer took cover behind a very large tree and was pinned down. He ran his G22 dry and was tossed spare G22 mags from other responding officers who were behind hard cover. This is one of the only times I've ever heard of an officer running a high capacity pistol dry, and the only time I can recall where magazine commonality played a crucial role in the officer's gunfight. The other LEOs were giving this officer quite a bit of shit. "You telling that story again? You're getting a lot of mileage out of this one." Pretty funny.
 
Posts: 1126 | Location: Arkansas | Registered: September 25, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I swear I had
something for this
posted Hide Post
Because of the pussies running YouTube and Google, I'm only allowed to post this video instead of embedding it. Clint Smith goes over data from the 80's and 90's above average shots per firefight with LEO's and the jist of the story is they shot until they were empty.

https://youtu.be/H3l6BR4YXKY

For your CCW, it's up to you. Whatever makes you feel comfortable because you aren't going out in the middle of the night be Frank Castle The Punisher.
 
Posts: 4597 | Location: Kansas City, MO | Registered: May 28, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
"In this free-for-all, the assailant had, in fact, been struck 14 times. Any one of six of these wounds – in the heart, right lung, left lung, liver, diaphragm, and right kidney – could have produced fatal consequences, “in time,” Gramins emphasizes."


The problem of gunfights is what we "know" or "think we know" comes from movies and tv. It looks awesome when gets hit with a handgun and there's some cool flashes and smoke, bad guy flies back 10 feet in the air. Somehow, even subconsciously, that seeps into our heads.

Heaven forbid, any of you on here experience a gunfight. There's some here that have. It ain't fun. Sometime after that war, squishy feeling between your butt cheeks is gone, you process things. You don't really want to get into a gunfight with a handgun. Even if it does start with a .4... The ability for "immediate" incapacitating an attacker is rather small.

Dump 6 rounds of .44 Mag center mass on someone that's motivated, maybe toss in a little PCP, maybe sprinkle a little crazy... It's not going to stop "right now"!

There's multiple documented cases where people have been hit in the head, taking out a chunk of the skull and brain, and still functioning for a short period. A lot of stuff can happen in that "short period". (One solider in Vietnam was able to change the barrel and reload his M-60 and return some fire before succumbing to his head wound)

You want to stop someone RIGHT NOW- use a larger caliber rifle.


As to the OP, one of the incidents off the top of my head is the LA Bank robbery back in the 90's.
I'm sure back in the 80'-early 90's during the change from "6 guns" to higher capacity 9mm, there may have been a few incidents.
KevH posted an excellent site to research. Unfortunately it only goes back so far.


______________________________________________________________________
"When its time to shoot, shoot. Dont talk!"

“What the government is good at is collecting taxes, taking away your freedoms and killing people. It’s not good at much else.” —Author Tom Clancy
 
Posts: 8651 | Location: Attempting to keep the noise down around Midway Airport | Registered: February 14, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Of course there are black swans, but the over-riding factor in winning gun fights is getting good hits, preferably to the pump or CNS. When I go back for my next degree I'll do a multivariate analysis that includes capacity, hits, location of hits and rounds fired.

Somehow I managed to survive a career starting in 1984 with a revolver, to a 1911 and on to a P226
 
Posts: 632 | Registered: June 11, 2018Reply With QuoteReport This Post
"Member"
Picture of cas
posted Hide Post
Conversely, you'll be hard pressed to find any post shootout after action reports where someone wished they had less ammo. Wink
 
Posts: 21501 | Location: 18th & Fairfax  | Registered: May 17, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
They exist and while not the norm consider that there are some factors to include,

Cops go to stuff together so more guns technically hopefully means less individual reloads if its a gunfight.

Cops almost across the board do autoloaders with 17 rds being standard.

Bullets and people do really weird stuff and there are no guarantees, even with good hits to the vitals. More opportunities to poke holes in the vitals is always better to raise the chances to stop a fight.

Something I'd like to add to the case of Gramins is the need for routine force on force in LE which is not always available (or sometimes sought after). More time on the range is certainly part of the equation but a lot of times people have to settle into a gunfight and accept that its happening to come out of the OHJEEZUS surprise where they try to hose a bad guy down then settle into aiming. I'm a believer in sims and FOF being another part of the solution to give folks a bit more edge in a fight.

I run three mags on or off duty. I consider that a minimum, for me, outside of special circumstances. To me, I'd rather have it and not need it. A few rounds is the norm but going to work and going home with nothing happening is the norm too. The gun is for something weird and if that happens then something statistically anomalous can happen during that fight as well.
 
Posts: 3131 | Location: Pnw | Registered: March 21, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I just received my CWP her in PA, so I am thinking about what to carry. It is a tough choice I am thinking either a Randall #1 fighting knife or a Springfield Armory XDM in 10mm with three extra 16 round magazines. The plus to the Randall is I never have to worry about hitting an innocent bystander and the plus to the 10mm is I am all set if a Polar bear attacks. No actually I will probably get a SIG 365 XMacro with one or two extra magazines.


Rule Number Nine - Always carry a knife.
 
Posts: 41 | Registered: June 19, 2023Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Sigforum K9 handler
Picture of jljones
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by cas:
Conversely, you'll be hard pressed to find any post shootout after action reports where someone wished they had less ammo. Wink


Or scored their hits slower.




www.opspectraining.com

"It's a bold strategy, Cotton. Let's see if it works out for them"



 
Posts: 37293 | Location: Logical | Registered: September 12, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Back in the 80's most departments carried revolvers. I know mine did. We were a big city. One time at a competitive shoot at the police range; I brought my Model 52 Smith and Wesson that shot 38 wadcutters and was told I could not use it "no semi autos allowed". We never had a problem with 6 shooters fighting crime.


Jeeps...guns...German Shepherds!
 
Posts: 100 | Location: Twin Cities Minnesota | Registered: September 29, 2021Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of RichardC
posted Hide Post
There might be someone who had an errant round cause injury or death that wishes he or she had fired fewer rounds more slowly.


____________________



 
Posts: 16311 | Location: Florida | Registered: June 23, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Imagination and focus
become reality
posted Hide Post
What is the percentage of "hits" by police officers involved in shooting? 20-30%. It seems like more accurate hits are more important than fast misses.
 
Posts: 6796 | Location: Northwest Indiana | Registered: August 15, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
E tan e epi tas
Picture of cslinger
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Ogie:
What is the percentage of "hits" by police officers involved in shooting? 20-30%. It seems like more accurate hits are more important than fast misses.


I hear this all the time and while there is absolutely a training aspect the first thing that always pops into my mind when people bring this up is that unless you are EXTREMELY well trained/hardened there is that whole “HOLY SHIT SOMEBODY IS TRYING TO KILL ME!!!” Reaction at work as well.


"Guns are tools. The only weapon ever created was man."
 
Posts: 8014 | Location: On the water | Registered: July 25, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  SIG Pistols    How many incidents have there been where an LEO was killed or otherwise taken out of the fight due to weapon capacity?

© SIGforum 2024