Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
Member |
This forum is in severe need of a "like button" | |||
|
Member |
Agree!! | |||
|
Member |
Phil Strader commented on Facebook this morning that the P365’s are shipping again. ------------------------------------------ I'm sorry could you repeat that, I'm not fluent in STUPID! | |||
|
Doin' what I can with what I got |
Just shot one with the 10 round magazine. I'll be buying one. Or two. ---------------------------------------- Death smiles at us all. Be sure you smile back. | |||
|
Member |
Taking another tack, I'd like to commend the Sig folks for the change up pitch. Sig has pitched plenty of other "next great things" way too early, only to leave us fanboys panting like dogs waiting for a steak. ... and waiting... and waiting... I'd like to credit Sig with not overhyping this 2 years back. I'll most likely step up and buy this one once it gets shook out a bit. | |||
|
Member |
I know this is a Sig Forum and I am a Sig fan, but I wonder about the size of the available market for the P365. I mean, how many people looking for a CCW pistol have not already bought a G43, Shield, PPS, CCP, LC9 (now EC9), etc.? With availability of extended mags and +1 or +2 mag extensions, betting on a one or 2 round capacity as a significant advantage is, in my opinion, a bit of a long shot. Hope it works out for them. Can’t help but wonder what would happen if they introduced in 2015? Sigs, HKs, S&Ws, Rugers, Wilsons, Nighthawks, Colts | |||
|
Student of Weapons Craft |
A lot of people said that Glock was too late with the 43. They missed the boat by releasing the .380 42 first. Everyone already has a Shield etc... Glock still managed to sell a boat load of 43's. Hell, the Glock was more expensive and lower capacity than the Shield. Sig has delivered a higher capacity gun in the same footprint at a price competitive with the Glock (assuming night sights on both). I think Sig will sell quite a few P365s. If it truly is the same size, it might replace my 43.
| |||
|
"Member" |
An ass for every seat and why things are so subjective... I handled the 365 at the Great American Outdoor show and I don't think I've ever held ANY handgun that felt so bad and fit my hand so poorly as that did. The dimensions just don't fit my hand. No way for me to hold it and have it point straight. My friend liked it a lot and plans to buy one ASAP. _____________________________________________________ Sliced bread, the greatest thing since the 1911. | |||
|
Big Stack |
Of course SIG faces the same issue Glock did. Glock has likely sold every G43 they could have sold since they released it. But Smith sold a million Shields before the 43 came out. If Glock had gotten the 43 out contemporaneously with the Shield, they could have banked at least half that business. Now SIG is jumping into this market. At least there coming with something that's different and advantageous. On the flop side, they're getting in when the demand for guns has dropped significantly. So whatever share they get is of a smaller market.
| |||
|
Normality Contraindicated |
The G43 and Shield are single stack nines, which have been around for decades. Sure, they're smaller and lighter. The advantage (from a marketplace perception standpoint) that the Sig P365 has is that it offers a "new" magazine advancement of higher capacity without increasing width, through a semi-single staggered-stack magazine. Even though Sig may be late to the striker fired compact carry nine market with this gun, some people are drawn to buying things that are new advancements. ------------------------------------------------------ Though we choose between reality and madness It's either sadness or euphoria | |||
|
Go ahead punk, make my day |
The innovation is the magazine size / capacity - think G43 Mags are obviously not pushing the envelope, with lots of wasted space in the design. Hopefully other manufacturers will bring this type of thing to market as well. | |||
|
Member |
Got my 12 round mag today......13 rounds in this package....Wow! | |||
|
Member |
Other manufacturers may have a problem as I understand that the innovations are patent protected. EasyFire EasyFire [AT] zianet.com ---------------------------------- NRA Certified Pistol Instructor Colorado Concealed Handgun Permit Instructor Nationwide Agent for > US LawShield > https://www.texaslawshield.com...p.php?promo=ondemand CCW Safe > www.ccwsafe.com/CCHPI | |||
|
The guy behind the guy |
You said this same thing back on page 19 of this thread. I’m curious what it is about the patent application (Sig has not yet been granted a patent at all) that is so unique or specialized that would keep others from altering their designs just enough to avoid patent infringement? Assuming Sig is even granted a patent for this mag. | |||
|
Member |
Sadly I cannot answer your question as to whether or not other manufacturers can design around the Sig patent applied for design. Actually I hope they can as competition improves the marketplace. EasyFire [AT] zianet.com ---------------------------------- NRA Certified Pistol Instructor Colorado Concealed Handgun Permit Instructor Nationwide Agent for > US LawShield > https://www.texaslawshield.com...p.php?promo=ondemand CCW Safe > www.ccwsafe.com/CCHPI | |||
|
The guy behind the guy |
The double stack mag has been around a loooong time. Over 100 years long. I can’t possibly imagine what Sig has done that is so revolutionary as to keep others from doing it. Sig has a patent on their piston AR upper, as do most piston AR makers. Yet they all avoid infringement. Again, patent law is very specific. If you have a legal reason for your statements, please share them. Otherwise, it’s just giving folks bad info. Mark my words, S&W/Glock/Springfield/etc are all working on a 9 to 11 +1 1” wide gun that is about the same height as the 365. | |||
|
Member |
Well I know I am not confused about where I stand on this issue... EasyFire [AT] zianet.com ---------------------------------- NRA Certified Pistol Instructor Colorado Concealed Handgun Permit Instructor Nationwide Agent for > US LawShield > https://www.texaslawshield.com...p.php?promo=ondemand CCW Safe > www.ccwsafe.com/CCHPI | |||
|
Member |
I suspect that many who own a Shield or G43 will be buying the P365 anyways. They may keep the other guns, or sell them, but most likely many, many will use the P365 as their primary CCW piece. I still think that if Sig made a longer version of the P365, it would be very popular. Say 14 round mag with a 3.6" barrel. -c1steve | |||
|
Member |
The 229c was a 3.4" barrel with a 15-rd mag. It came out in 2016 and Sig doesn't even list it on the website anymore. Perhaps a striker-fired version would fare better than the hammer-fired. <><><><><><><><><><><><><> "I drank what?" - Socrates | |||
|
Left-Handed, NOT Left-Winged! |
I would consider a P365 once they are proven reliable. I have held one and for me the grip is very good, and just a hair thicker than a G43. Glock's issue is their insistence on squared off body plastic coated magazines which increases grip bulk for all models. Sig is already doing fine with the P238 and P938. They are actually smaller than the G42 & G43 with similar capacity. For 1911 fans, or people who insist on having a safety they seem to be popular. I have concerns about reliability, but the newer ones seem to have worked out the kinks. I looked at a P938 yesterday, and just can't get a good feeling about the safety - too small, stiff, and easy to "miss" when you need it. Still, they shoot surprising well, at least with Hogue finger groove grips. | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ... 34 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |