SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  SIG Pistols    Sig P320 issues with Canadian JTF-2
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Sig P320 issues with Canadian JTF-2 Login/Join 
Member
Picture of CQB60
posted Hide Post
JTF-2 actually used the P226 prior to & migrated away from the BHP some time ago..
quote:
Originally posted by Lefty Sig:
Hmmm, they moved from BHP's to the P320 and someone touched off a round? Sounds like they learned poor trigger discipline on the BHP's and relied on the manual safety a little too much.

But did the Canucks get M17/M18 manual safety pistols or non-safety ones? I haven't heard of any issues with the M17/M18 with regard to "unintentional" discharges since they had the lightened trigger and added disconnector from the get go.


______________________________________________
Life is short. It’s shorter with the wrong gun…
 
Posts: 13868 | Location: VIrtual | Registered: November 13, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of CAR
posted Hide Post
People have been accidently shooting themselves with their own guns since guns were invented, and I am pretty sure that trend will continue for centuries to come.
 
Posts: 926 | Location: Ohio | Registered: May 11, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by CQB60:
JTF-2 actually used the P226 prior to & migrated away from the BHP some time ago..
quote:
Originally posted by Lefty Sig:
Hmmm, they moved from BHP's to the P320 and someone touched off a round? Sounds like they learned poor trigger discipline on the BHP's and relied on the manual safety a little too much.

But did the Canucks get M17/M18 manual safety pistols or non-safety ones? I haven't heard of any issues with the M17/M18 with regard to "unintentional" discharges since they had the lightened trigger and added disconnector from the get go.


Wasn't it a 226 DAK?
 
Posts: 5806 | Location: Chicago | Registered: August 18, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Freethinker
Picture of sigfreund
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Bulldog7972:
Wasn't it a 226 DAK?


You may be thinking of the DAK P226ST that the RCMP adopted at one time. Some RCMP contract overruns were made available for sale here:





According to Canada’s Secret Commandos: The Unauthorized Story of Joint Task Force Two by David Pugliese, published in 2002, at the time JTF2 did use 9mm SIG Classic line pistols (P225, P226, P228, P229). That was a deliberate decision not to use Browning Hi Powers which were the other option, supposedly because they could be carried safely with rounds chambered, whereas the BHP could not. No mention of the DAK, but then the book was written before the introduction of the DAK trigger, so it could have been adopted later.




6.4/93.6
___________
“We are Americans …. Together we have resisted the trap of appeasement, cynicism, and isolation that gives temptation to tyrants.”
— George H. W. Bush
 
Posts: 47817 | Location: 10,150 Feet Above Sea Level in Colorado | Registered: April 04, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of CQB60
posted Hide Post
Not DAK but TDA. Same spec as the NSW P226 as well...
quote:
Originally posted by Bulldog7972:
quote:
Originally posted by CQB60:
JTF-2 actually used the P226 prior to & migrated away from the BHP some time ago..
quote:
Originally posted by Lefty Sig:
Hmmm, they moved from BHP's to the P320 and someone touched off a round? Sounds like they learned poor trigger discipline on the BHP's and relied on the manual safety a little too much.

But did the Canucks get M17/M18 manual safety pistols or non-safety ones? I haven't heard of any issues with the M17/M18 with regard to "unintentional" discharges since they had the lightened trigger and added disconnector from the get go.


Wasn't it a 226 DAK?


______________________________________________
Life is short. It’s shorter with the wrong gun…
 
Posts: 13868 | Location: VIrtual | Registered: November 13, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I think you are correct. It was the RCMP.
 
Posts: 5806 | Location: Chicago | Registered: August 18, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  SIG Pistols    Sig P320 issues with Canadian JTF-2

© SIGforum 2024