Seeing Para's Hi Power thread reminded me that I do not have one and always wanted one in my collection. I looed a bit years ago but remember there were several iterations of this. Which one, ones, years, etc would be considered the best era to acquire? Not something for pure collectability but more a blend of performance, nostalgia and collectability as it will be shot. thanks
Here's an old friend of mine. 1990 production standard Sport Model, forged frame. Bone stock. Handsome and reliable. I had considered taking out the magazine safety, but I think I'm going to leave it as-is.
As far as collectiblity, I'd say FN Belgium is first with Browning a very close second. For a shooter, I honestly have never heard of a bad Hi-Power clone. I own a Browning MK III, a FEG and a FM Argentine Detective Model. All have been absolutely reliable and excellent shooters. I've also never heard anything bad about the Kareem or Israeli guns. The design is so good that you'd actually have to work at screwing it up. But right now, if you're in the market for a Hi-Power I'd very strongly suggest that you take a hard look at the brand new Springfield Armory SA-35 which was just released yesterday. I know I'll be buying one.
This is a MkIIIS, 1995 production, Cast frame, enamel over phosphate. The pistol wears a set of Craig Spegel Delrin grip panels. Very slim in the hand. I've never fired this pistol.
Here's my very late T-series Browning. I haven't seen this one in a while. It's in a safe deposit box.
...along with this one. Here is the earliest Browning-imported High Power you're ever likely to see. According to R. Blake Stevens, High Powers with serial numbers just above 70000 were the first Browning imports of the High Power, in late 1954. Serial number of my example is 70431
Here's my 1989 Mk 3 wth night sights, Hogue Kingswood grips, and refinished by CCR. I bought it with an amazingly crisp trigger, a major reason I bought it.
[IMG:left][/IMG]
Posts: 3553 | Location: Alexandria, VA | Registered: March 07, 2011
Para does that last pistol have an internal extractor? Thumb scallop? In my opinion, an internal extractor with no scallop (only made ~2 years) is the most aesthetically pleasing. I have one, and missed out on one with inset adjustable revolver rear sight.
Posts: 10080 | Location: Woodinville, WA | Registered: March 30, 2004
I don't know but I could research it. All I can tell you is this is why my example is in a safe deposit box.
Mine is in comparable condition, appears unfired, and the serial number is lower than the one you that went for 3250 earlier this year. The only thing is, the magazine safety has been removed.
You know, I bought this pistol off gunsamerica more than twenty years ago. Back then the pictures of firearms for sale on that site were sometimes very small. I looked very closely at this tiny picture of a High Power, called the guy, got the serial number and bought it right away. I think I paid 900 for it. I asked the guy- how long have you had that ad up on gunsamerica, and he said, oh, about 8 months. No shit.
To many BHP "experts" (whatever that means), the Best of the Bunch of HPs are the "T" and the "C" models. Just get braced on price if they are in primo shape. They could be shooters, but many folks would not shoot them. I own a "C" series Renaissance model that does get shot a bit from time to time.
Posts: 6769 | Location: Az | Registered: May 27, 2005
Originally posted by Voshterkoff: PGT, was the leather case in the first picture plaid lined?
I have that same case, made at roughly the same time as the .30 Luger High Power pictured with it. Actually, it's where I store my 1990 High Power. The case has a red felt interior, with a muzzle pocket.
I bought the case in a gunshop in 1982 or 83, I guess a High Power came into the store in trade and the gun store separated the pistol from its case in order to make a few extra dollars.
While I’ve owned a T and C series, I gravitate towards late models MkIIIs, since the entry point is a bit lower, although that’s up for debate nowadays.
I have no issue with stock HPs, but, my preference is modified: