September 06, 2019, 01:42 PM
sean7New to me 229-40-SN
quote:
Originally posted by Mustang-PaPa:
How close to AL12444 is yours?
Looks like they were both from the same production run.
+16. Probably a safe bet.
September 06, 2019, 06:49 PM
tcfieroWithout the box denoting a Satin Nickel, how does one go about identifying if you have one? I have an AF serial number 229 that looks like the one by the OP. It has the 40 barrel that looks to be stainless also.
September 06, 2019, 06:59 PM
12131quote:
Originally posted by tcfiero:
Without the box denoting a Satin Nickel, how does one go about identifying if you have one? I have an AF serial number 229 that looks like the one by the OP. It has the 40 barrel that looks to be stainless also.
Nickel SIGs are fairly easy to recognize. Whether it's factory or not is another matter. To me, a real factory one has to fulfill one of the following.
1- Original owner.
2- Original case/box with confirmation label.
3- SIG confirms for you, in writing, that it is facfory finish. Verbal confirmation means nothing. If it's not in writing, it didn't happen.
Everything else is wishy washy. Ymmv.
September 07, 2019, 11:39 PM
Mustang-PaPaquote:
Originally posted by sean7:
quote:
Originally posted by Mustang-PaPa:
How close to AL12444 is yours?
Looks like they were both from the same production run.
+16. Probably a safe bet.
Yes i bet they were a small run.
Yours is the first i recall ever reading about here on the forum from the same batch of serial numbers and with the stainless steel Bbl.
I recall other members with all SN 229 coatings but not “AL” and stainless bbls.
The all stainless factory bbls are uncommon. I have seen them from the same or close years in the 226/9 & 220/45 over the years here but not that many.
Enjoy yours and shoot it. Also pick up a 357sig bbl if you want to shoot that rd.
September 08, 2019, 04:00 AM
David LeeSean7 can you post us a few more pics please? I think it would be sweet if they came with a stainless barrel as Mustang states. Any comments of the gun with stainless barrel Q?
September 08, 2019, 09:57 AM
sean7quote:
Originally posted by David Lee:
Sean7 can you post us a few more pics please? I think it would be sweet if they came with a stainless barrel as Mustang states. Any comments of the gun with stainless barrel Q?
Sure. Here's a couple more.
https://www.amazon.com/photos/...fyJUEuFVCZ0S7jsy6fBqSeptember 08, 2019, 10:02 AM
ArtieSWow, that's nice.
September 25, 2019, 05:18 PM
HappychiThe one pictured in the amazon photo is not a Sig Gun of the Month.
The Sig Gun of the Month was put out in June, 2004.
A number of P229's were coated similar to the P229 GOTM but were not done or sold by Sig.
Look closely at the take down lever. It's flat, yes? That is a good visual key that it is not a Sig GOTM.
When Sig put out the GOTM, they were made with a "stepped" take down lever to help reduce scratching the frame in the dis-assembly process.
September 27, 2019, 10:56 PM
kingfish007I have AL12466 with the stainless bbl. Always thought it was the GOTM until reading this thread... I use an EKG Fire Dragon 9mm conversion barrel with it and it shoots great.
October 01, 2019, 08:34 AM
12131quote:
Originally posted by Happychi:
The one pictured in the amazon photo is not a Sig Gun of the Month.
The Sig Gun of the Month was put out in June, 2004.
A number of P229's were coated similar to the P229 GOTM but were not done or sold by Sig..
OP's gun, although not GOTM, was sold by SIG as factory Ni. So is
Mustang-PaPa's gun. Btw, none of the factory Ni guns were done in-house by SIG. They were all farmed out to be Nickel plated.
October 01, 2019, 08:51 AM
ggilequote:
Originally posted by David Lee:
12131, why can I never see your photos here in Sig Forum? Just the little box or nothing at all. Same with your Colt ad, no photos.
I have the same problem!!
October 01, 2019, 10:08 AM
12131quote:
Originally posted by 12131:
Whether OP's gun is GOTM or not, I don't know. But, fyi, not all GOTMs will have the month/year on the label indicating it's a GOTM.
Here is the April '04 GOTM, the P228 with Hi-Viz front and comes with one P226 mag with the Freed grip adapter. The label gives no hints that it is a GOTM.
I just happened to go through the
>> GOTM link << and notice an interesting factoid. None of the 2003 and 2004 GOTMs have the MonthYear in their Part Numbers. Only the 2005 GOTMs have them MonthYear in the Part Numbers.
2003Month: April
Part Number: 226-9-B-XPBM
Month: May
Part Number: 226-40-B-SOG
Month: June
Part Number: SP2009-9-B-PS
Month: July
Part Number: 228-9-CAMO
Month: August
Part Number: H90103ELEY
Month: September
Part Number: 229-40-CAMO
Cancelled due to problems with the finish. Month: October
Part Number: 220-45-S-NILLS
Month: November
Part Number: 229-9-BLG
Month: December
Part Number: 232-380-S-GOLD
2004Month: January
Part Number: H90104RD
Month: February
Part Number: 226-40-STR
Month: March
Part Number: 225-9-RB
Month: April
Part Number: 228-9-HV
Month: May
Part Number: 239-40-RBT
Month: June
Part Number: 229-40-SN
Month: July
Part Number: 220-45-SCS
Month: August
Part Number: 229-40-ESG
Month: September
Part Number: 232-380-NMR
Month: October
Part Number: 226-9-BLG
Month: November
Part Number: 220-45-SKC
Month: December
Part Number: 229-40-DS
2005Month: January
Part Number: 229R-9-JAN05
Month: February
Part Number: 245-45-FEB05
Month: March
Part Number: 220R-45-MAR05
Month: April
Part Number: 239-40-APR05
Month: May
Part Number: 1911-45-MAY05
Cancelled due to manufacturing concerns, strong interest reported, possibly to be reintroduced at a later date.Month: June
Part Number: 229-40-JUN05
Month: July
Part Number: 232-38-JUL05
Month: August
Part Number: 226R-9-AUG05
Month: September
Part Number: 220-45-SEP05
Month: October
Part Number: 239-40-OCT05
Month: November
Part Number: 228-9-NOV05
Month: December
Part Number: 226-40-DEC05
Cancelled due to supply issues with Oakley.