SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  SIG Pistols    1911 guide rods: short (GI), two piece or one piece?
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
1911 guide rods: short (GI), two piece or one piece? Login/Join 
Member
Picture of az4783054
posted
My new to me DAN WESSON CBOB Classic 45 came with a short (GI?) guide rod. I'm certain DW knew what they were doing with this choice, but I'm curious.

Is there any distinct advantage to the short guide rod, two piece guide rod or one piece guide rod? Would you be so inclined with a semi custom pistol such as a DW?


If people would mind their own damn business this country would be better off. I owe no one an explanation or an apology for my personal opinion.
 
Posts: 11205 | Location: Somewhere north of a hot humid hell in the summer | Registered: January 09, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Not really from Vienna
Picture of arfmel
posted Hide Post
Short ones are fine with me.
 
Posts: 27235 | Location: SW of Hovey, Texas | Registered: January 30, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Green Mountain Boy
Picture of Jus228
posted Hide Post
The one you've got is the way Browning wanted it. No reason to mess with it. It's also the easiest to field strip.


!~God Bless the U.S. Military~!

If the world didn't suck, we'd all fall off

Light travels faster than sound, this is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak
 
Posts: 5565 | Location: Vermont | Registered: March 02, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
https://sigforum.com/eve/forums...935/m/6180085024/p/1



"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts." Sherlock Holmes
 
Posts: 1286 | Registered: February 26, 2015Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of az4783054
posted Hide Post
Thanks for the replies and that link. There seems to be no consensus one way or the other so I'll default to the DW engineers.


If people would mind their own damn business this country would be better off. I owe no one an explanation or an apology for my personal opinion.
 
Posts: 11205 | Location: Somewhere north of a hot humid hell in the summer | Registered: January 09, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of CQB60
posted Hide Post
My preference. IMHO, round recoil springs perform better with FLGR's, Flat springs, with either.


______________________________________________
Life is short. It’s shorter with the wrong gun…
 
Posts: 13868 | Location: VIrtual | Registered: November 13, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Each post crafted from
rich Corinthian leather
Picture of TheFrontRange
posted Hide Post
My personal preference is toward the GI-style guide rod. Having owned 1911s that were equipped with either the 1- or 2-piece full-length guide rods, I'd pick the 1-piece if I just had to have one. They can't come unscrewed like a 2-piece can.

From having read commentary from folks with a lot more 1911 experience than I have, the consensus seems to be: go with what works best for you.



"The sea was angry that day, my friends - like an old man trying to send back soup in a deli." - George Costanza
 
Posts: 6739 | Registered: September 04, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
GI type is far superior. Easier to field strip, allows using the rod plug pushed against a hard object to charge the pistol or clear a stubborn jam.
 
Posts: 3413 | Location: Finally free in AZ! | Registered: February 14, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Billy346
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by captain127:
GI type is far superior. Easier to field strip, allows using the rod plug pushed against a hard object to charge the pistol or clear a stubborn jam.


I had never thought of this.... It makes sense, but wouldn't you be concerned that the bushing would get pushed out of whack?


"Like a horse has its rider, and the sky has its moon, a man has his loneliness, mistaken as pride." -Longmire
 
Posts: 539 | Location: Northern Virginia | Registered: January 19, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
His diet consists of black
coffee, and sarcasm.
Picture of egregore
posted Hide Post
The one it came with is fine. Negative on a two-piece rod. Anywhere there is a threaded joint increases the chances of it breaking. The sharp shoulder at the end of the threads is a stress concentration. Ever break a segmented long gun cleaning rod?
 
Posts: 28893 | Location: Johnson City, TN | Registered: April 28, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I have owned and shot all three.
I still have GI and one-piece.
The two piece FLGR is an invention of the devil trying to spoil St Browning's work.
 
Posts: 3331 | Location: Florence, Alabama, USA | Registered: July 05, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
There is no reliability or accuracy advantage of one or the other.

However, a Dawson Tool-Less one peice guide rod will, in my opinion, make take down easier than the stock set up.

In addition, while not an issue in a stock 1911, if you have a very hard fit barrel bushing in a custom gun, you are never turning the bushing while the barrel is locked in battery, and eliminate the need to disassemble and reassemble a slide onto the frame with the uncaptured spring.
 
Posts: 13 | Location: Arizona | Registered: June 05, 2015Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I use to shoot with FLGR but about a year ago I returned to the classic GI short guide rod but I used a stainless one from Wilson or Nighthawk not the hollow piece that came with my Colt..for me its more convenient to dismantle and more classic looking..
 
Posts: 263 | Location: Manila, philippines | Registered: January 24, 2016Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
The guide rod has no function in the accuracy of the 1911. Some think that it does and think that a full length guide rod provides an additional means for the slide to align and track, with the mistaken belief that the pistol is made more accurate. It isn't. Lockup in battery is what's important; the lockup of the slide to barrel at the moment the shot is discharged. The barrel bushing (or slide interface for bushingless 1911's) and the barrel link are important, as is the fitting of the barrel, but not the guide rod.

The purpose of the guide rod is to prevent the springs from kinking or binding during recoil; it's not there to guide the slide, but to guide the recoil spring.

A full length guide rod on a 1911 provides a little extra forward weight on the pistol.

The two-piece full length rods tend to unscrew at inopportune times, which can affect function of the firearm.
 
Posts: 6650 | Registered: September 13, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Billy346:
quote:
Originally posted by captain127:
GI type is far superior. Easier to field strip, allows using the rod plug pushed against a hard object to charge the pistol or clear a stubborn jam.


I had never thought of this.... It makes sense, but wouldn't you be concerned that the bushing would get pushed out of whack?

No when you use the front edge of the slide against the hard object the object will rest across the lower edge of the bushing and spring plug had to do this a few times with some out of spec reloads and works like a charm.
 
Posts: 3413 | Location: Finally free in AZ! | Registered: February 14, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  SIG Pistols    1911 guide rods: short (GI), two piece or one piece?

© SIGforum 2024