Member
| If Sig wants to make them available and someone wants to buy them, I say great. It won't be me, but in my opinion, whether it's quasi-military or pure civilian race-gun with colored frame and the hubble space telescope for an optic, I think Sig did a fantastic job with the P320.
Not talking about Sig's debacle and denial over the drop-issue. That's been beaten to death. But as I sit here in my office, with a P320 on the table, I can't help but appreciate the pistol as a finished product. I own a few, and there isn't a lemon among them. To me that says a lot.
The one sitting here is a full size. No slide cut for an optic. I've replaced the factory grip module with the x-frame, full size. The balance, function, trigger, everything about it I like. Not everyone likes it, and not everyone will want the military wanna-be commercial version, but that's okay. I wouldn't have touched any of the rainbow shiny pistols that Bruce mentioned, but Sig kept the lights on with them, as they may do with this run. I think it probably doesn't matter right now; Sig can't lose with the run of military contracts, increasing numbers of law enforcement deals, P365 productions that sell as fast as they hit the shelves, and over half a million P320's in civvy hands.
I wouldn't have bought one. I wasn't remotely interested, any more than the 250 interested me. Not until I was at a range and someone said "here, try mine," that I tried, and wished I hadn't just bought a Glock. It took trying one, shooting it, to really appreciate it. After that, I wanted one, and once I had one, I wanted another. I don't care about "special coatings inside; I have lubricant for that, grease and oil, and regular maintenance. I don't need a thumb safety, because one of the selling points for the pistol for me is the absence of a safety. I have zero use for an "anti-tamper" device, which means a stock off the shelf P320 is just about perfect. |