SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  Ammunition    New to 9mm

Moderators: LDD, parabellum
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
New to 9mm Login/Join 
Member
posted
I currently have a P229 in 357/40 but I haven't had .40 in it for a while. I will be buying a P320 compact 9mm within a month or so.

I have been doing research as to which carry ammo to use and I think I've settled on the Hornady Critical Defense 115gr.

My question is what is a good practice ammo to use that is similar in point of aim and felt recoil?

Both price and availability are important factor.

Also if anyone have an opinion on a better carry round I'm all ears.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: greg0773,


__________________________
Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction.

Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.

Albert Einstein
 
Posts: 205 | Location: Roanoke Va | Registered: September 06, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Peace through
superior firepower
Picture of parabellum
posted Hide Post
It's been a while since I looked at the Hornady Critical Defense but I seem to recall that the 115 grain Critical Defense has inadequate penetration in ballistic gel. Adequate penetration is essential for effective terminal performance. A round which over-penetrates is preferable to one which under-penetrates.

A better choice would be a bullet of at least 124 grains. If you want a 115 grain load, my choice in that weight would be the Speer 115 grain Gold Dot. That's a warm load, as 115 grain offerings go. The Gold Dot 124 grain standard pressure Gold Dot is a prime choice as well.

Federal HST 124 grain standard pressure is a premium choice. Your best choice, though, may be the HST 147 grain load.

The +P stuff- I don't recommend this in smaller pistols, due to the added recoil. Speer Gold Dot 124 grain +P has for years been my choice for my G17 house gun, but that's a full-size pistol and mine has the added weight of a Surefire X300 WML hanging at the muzzle.

For pistols you might carry, you have to take into account one hand and especially weak hand shots. You don't need the added recoil from +P loads.

Here's an ammunition tester you can trust, and it seems my memory may have played a trick on me, because the 115 grain Critical Defense looks pretty damn good in this video. I may have been thinking of the .380 Critical Defense loading. Most .380 hollowpoint ammunition does not penetrate adequately in ballistic gel, with the FBI standard of 12 to 18 inches of penetration in calibrated ballistic gelatin.



____________________________________________________

He claims on Tuesday that what he said on Monday needed updating, with the intention of saying on Wednesday that his correction on Tuesday was also wrong, while he awaits more bookings for Thursday’s clarifications—all the while damning the ignorant mob who disseminates supposedly false information. - Victor Davis Hanson, speaking about Anthony Fauci
 
Posts: 96379 | Registered: January 20, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Thank you for the info. I went back and check the videos I watched and they were a few years old. So I think I will go with what I know the gold dot in 124gr. As far as practice ammo is any standard pressure 124gr round going to have a similar POA and recoil? Because I've found some great deals on bulk pac 9mm in 124gr.


__________________________
Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction.

Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.

Albert Einstein
 
Posts: 205 | Location: Roanoke Va | Registered: September 06, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Peace through
superior firepower
Picture of parabellum
posted Hide Post
You can't go wrong with the 124 grain Gold Dot.

I don't think you can count on 9mm fmj practice ammo being up to par, pressure-wise, with quality hollowpoint ammunition. For instance, I've shot a lot of Federal American Eagle and while I don't have access to a chronograph, it's very soft-shooting. However, at 25 feet or less, I don't think you'll see much difference at all in point of impact between 124 grain practice ammo and 124 grain hollowpoint ammo, not enough to matter, anyway. Other members may be able to give you more specifics in that respect.
 
Posts: 96379 | Registered: January 20, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Freethinker
Picture of sigfreund
posted Hide Post
This is what Speer advertises about its “Lawman” line of FMJ training ammunition:
“Offers the same feel and point of aim as comparable self-defense loads.”

I assume that refers to its standard pressure Gold Dot loads. From a 4 inch barrel its advertised velocity is 1090 fps and the 124 grain GD “Personal Protection” load is advertised at 1150 fps. That’s not too significant in view of the fact that when I have students shoot 115 grain standard pressure training ammunition and 124 grain +P Gold Dot back to back they can feel a difference in recoil, but hardly enough for even novice shooters to comment about.

Added: I have had to use many different types of 9mm ammunition for training over the years, and the most obvious effects of variations in power levels are reliability in some guns and ejection patterns. I’ve seen some users have failures to cycle their guns with low-powered loads, and such loads are more likely to result in ejected cases being thrown straight back over (or even onto) shooters’ heads which annoys some people. Even in good times I never worried about different weight or power levels of the training stuff.




“The fundamental cause of trouble in the world today is that the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.”
— Bertrand Russell
 
Posts: 44812 | Location: 10,150 Feet Above Sea Level in Colorado | Registered: April 04, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
The success of a solution usually depends upon your point of view
posted Hide Post
I keep Federal HST 147 my P320C. It shoots very smooth in it.
For range ammo I usually use 124gr FMJ from GA Arms.

I don't notice any significant difference between them when I do shoot up some of my older stock of carry ammo. The 124gr FMJ is a little more snappy but not much. The groupings I shoot at any distance are not tight enough for any difference to be noticeable.



“Banning guns is like banning forks in an attempt to stop making people fat.” - Vince Vaughn

 
Posts: 3445 | Location: Jacksonville, FL | Registered: September 10, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  Ammunition    New to 9mm

© SIGforum 2022