Victim of a Series of Accidents
| Maybe you could just name the potential buyer as beneficiary and then just die? Seriously though, I'm not certain you can sell a trust as you would a corporation.
"Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue." - Barry Goldwater |
| Posts: 1971 | Location: Minnesota | Registered: February 23, 2002 |
IP
|
|
Member
| The settlor and grantor would not change. It seems to me like an end run around the transfer laws... Almost like a straw buy.
From the buyer's perspective, I would guess the original owner would retain some control over the trust and I don't think I would personally like that. |
| |
Member
| I would think the new rule (41F)would make the new owner file fingerprints and mugshot. |
| |
Member
| There is no ongoing requirement to notify the ATF of new trustees and submit prints and photos of trustees are added. The only requirement is that all responsible parties are printed and photographed when a form 1 or 4 is submitted. |
| |
Never miss an opportunity to STFU
| Why not sell the gun outright and be done with it, no more connection to it. If you're not going to use the trust any more, just let it lapse. Are you trying to get the money back you paid into the trust??? Adding a new person, turning the trust over to them, etc sure looks like a lot of contortions. It also looks obvious that you're trying to beat the stamp cost.
Never be more than one step away from your sword-Old Greek Wisdom |
| Posts: 2295 | Location: SE Mich-- USA | Registered: September 10, 2002 |
IP
|
|