SIGforum
Form 1 DISAPPROVED. Need Help Please
December 02, 2025, 10:39 AM
adorForm 1 DISAPPROVED. Need Help Please
I recently e-filed 3 Form 1 (Individual). Got 2 DISAPPROVAL emails this morning. Nothing yet on the 3rd one. Here is what I submitted.
1. Factory Sig Flux Legion (P320). On the application form, I used the drop down box on Section (Model), selected “P320 Flux Legion”. I only sent a close up picture of the Serial Number.
On the Denial Letter, these are the messages:
WEAPON: ORIGINAL MANUFACTURER, SERIAL NUMBER AND/OR MODEL SHOULD MATCH EXACTLY AS IS STAMPED OR ENGRAVED ON FIREARM
MODEL = P320
PLEASE RESUBMIT WITH CORRECTED INFORMATION. FINGERPRINT CARDS AND PHOTOS MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH YOUR NEW APPLICATION. REFUND IN PROCESS.
NOTE: UPLOAD PHOTOS FOR VERIFICATION: SN/MFG./MODEL (CLOSE-UP).
2. H&R 9mm pistol with brace. On the application form, I used the drop down box on Section (Model), selected “SMG MOD 635”. I only sent a close up picture of the Serial Number.
On the Denial Letter, these are the messages:
WEAPON: ORIGINAL MANUFACTURER, SERIAL NUMBER AND/OR MODEL SHOULD MATCH EXACTLY AS IS STAMPED OR ENGRAVED ON FIREARM
MODEL = 635
PLEASE RESUBMIT WITH CORRECTED INFORMATION. FINGERPRINT CARDS AND PHOTOS MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH YOUR NEW APPLICATION. REFUND IN PROCESS.
NOTE: UPLOAD PHOTOS FOR VERIFICATION: SN/MFG./MODEL (CLOSE-UP).
A Based on the ATF messages, did I messed up on the “MODEL”? When I resubmit, do I just change that part of the form to what they specified (P320 & 635)?
B. What photos do I specifically send? (I only took a close up picture of the SERIAL NUMBER of the Flux Legion and a close up picture if the information on the receiver of the H&R pistol).
I tried calling ATF this morning and couldn't get through. I am trying to finish these forms before the end of December.
_______________________
P228 - West German
December 02, 2025, 11:36 AM
nhracecraftFirst of all, just because there is something you can select from a drop-down menu, does NOT mean that it is either accurate, or that the ATF has ever approved a Form 1 with that info. That may seem surprising, but I can assure you it is a true statement. This came up during the Pistol Brace Amnesty pursuant to ATF Final Rule 2021R-08F, and I believe eForms was fairly new/evolving at the time. It make NO sense, but that how the .gov works!
They seem to be providing you with some very specific (and surprisingly helpful) information, and they are not kidding when they say 'EXACTLY AS IS STAMPED OR ENGRAVED ON FIREARM'. Give them exactly what they're asking for...UPLOAD PHOTOS FOR VERIFICATION: SN/MFG./MODEL (CLOSE-UP).
MODEL = P320...Flux and Legion are just marketing terms
MODEL = 635...SMG is just marketing
Re: the P320, where are you expected/planning to engrave your Maker's info on that thing?
____________________________________________________________
If Some is Good, and More is Better.....then Too Much, is Just Enough !!
Trump 47....Making America Great Again!
"May Almighty God bless the United States of America" - parabellum 7/26/20
Live Free or Die!
December 02, 2025, 12:12 PM
adorJust received the 3rd DENIAL on the other 635. The letter specifically said “Corrected Model is 635”.
So is it safe to assume that I just need to change the MODEL to what ATF had indicated?
MODEL = P320
MODEL = 365
For picture, no need to send a photo of the entire firearm?
On the engraving of the P320, there is a blank space on the left side of the FCU. There is also an open window on the same side to display the information (opposite side where the SN is). My local engraver said that is where he engrave the previous P320 he did.
quote:
Originally posted by nhracecraft:
They seem to be providing you with some very specific (and surprisingly helpful) information, and they are not kidding when they say 'EXACTLY AS IS STAMPED OR ENGRAVED ON FIREARM'. Give them exactly what they're asking for...UPLOAD PHOTOS FOR VERIFICATION: SN/MFG./MODEL (CLOSE-UP).
MODEL = P320...Flux and Legion are just marketing terms
MODEL = 635...SMG is just marketing
Re: the P320, where are you expected/planning to engrave your Maker's info on that thing?
_______________________
P228 - West German
December 02, 2025, 02:14 PM
nhracecraftquote:
Originally posted by ador:
For picture, no need to send a photo of the entire firearm?
I've never sent a photo of the entire firearm, just close-up photos of the engravings. I have combined more than one engraving in a single photo if it was appropriate and/or unrealistic to photograph them separately. As an example, in the case of an AR-15 Receiver, I've sent two photos; One close-up of the Model & S/N, and one close-up of the Mfr & City, State.
UPLOAD PHOTOS FOR VERIFICATION:
1. SN
2. MFG - Include the mfr's location (City, State) in this photo as appropriate.
3. MODEL
The ATF is just looking to check boxes here. They look at the photo(s) of the engraving(s) you uploaded, and look at what you filled in on the form, and they're like, 'Yup, those match...Check'! Honestly it's refreshing to see the info they sent in their DISAPPROVED response email. It's almost like they're saying 'Just send us this and you'll be all set'!

____________________________________________________________
If Some is Good, and More is Better.....then Too Much, is Just Enough !!
Trump 47....Making America Great Again!
"May Almighty God bless the United States of America" - parabellum 7/26/20
Live Free or Die!
December 02, 2025, 02:16 PM
P220 SmudgeNever, ever select
anything from those drop-down menus. It's all auto-populated with the incorrect crap other people have entered. Only and ever type in exactly what is on your gun.
______________________________________________
"If the truth shall kill them, let them die.”
Endeavoring to master the subtle art of the grapefruit spoon.
December 02, 2025, 04:35 PM
Dwill104I recently had two F1s “approved with conditions” for the model designation stuff. The first was an Sig MPX, and I selected “MPX” as the model, because I assumed Sig wasn’t actually part of the model name, even though it was stamped in front of the “MPX”. The approved condition was model=SIG MPX. Next one I sent in was my HK USC. Based on the Sig experience, I selected “HK USC”, because, similar to the Sig, HK was stamped next to USC. Nope, the approved condition was model=USC. I had attached photos of the engravings with the forms. At least they didn’t outright disapprove them, but it’s a bit annoying.
Sorry they didn’t simply approve yours with the correct model “condition”, OP.
December 02, 2025, 04:42 PM
adorI wish they approved mine with condition, like yours. I struck out 3/3.

Now I wait for the $600 refund, so I can re-file.
quote:
Originally posted by Dwill104:
Sorry they didn’t simply approve yours with the correct model “condition”, OP.
_______________________
P228 - West German
December 02, 2025, 05:38 PM
shoevbThere used to be an NFA lawyer on the forum, HeavyD, who might be able to help. I haven't seen any posts by him in a while. I've used him several times.
December 02, 2025, 06:54 PM
Dwill104quote:
Originally posted by shoevb:
There used to be an NFA lawyer on the forum, HeavyD, who might be able to help. I haven't seen any posts by him in a while. I've used him several times.
TBH, it’s too late now. They’ve been disapproved and I don’t think they can resurrected. They have to be resubmitted as new submissions. Not sure what a NFA lawyer can do to change it.