If the Constitution is validly changed to eliminate the 1st Amendment, then they could pass laws that restricted the freedom of the press, for example.
It would be "legal" as there would be no more 1st Amendment.
Would that be acceptable or right? You know the answer to that question.
The fish is mute, expressionless. The fish doesn't think because the fish knows everything.
November 20, 2018, 06:35 PM
XinTX
"Acceptable"? Absolutely not. Their aim is to enslave those of the out of favor classes to provide for those on whom their favor shines. We Prolls must provide for them.
_______________________ “The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws.” Ayn Rand
“If we relinquish our rights because of fear, what is it exactly, then, we are fighting for?” Sen. Rand Paul