Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
Objectively Reasonable |
It was in a NPS area, so while NJ law applies in some respects, he was charged with violating a federal regulation. 36 CFR violations (including DWI) are "petty offenses" and are tried by judge only (usually, a U.S. Magistrate.) No juries, ever, even if it's appealed up to a full District Court judge. When I see as piss-low BAC but still objective indicators of intoxication, I wonder what other prescription/non-prescription drugs ol' Bruce might have consumed in conjunction with that beer. Douchery isn't a 36 CFR violation, unfortunately. | |||
|
Member |
Whatever you think of Springsteen personally, the evidence points to this being a chickenshit charge in the first place. He wasn't drunk or under the influence of anything. He was seen by a ranger taking a sip of liquor from a fan while stopped on his motorcycle, and then stopped. If it happened to anybody else we wouldn't even be having this discussion. | |||
|
Wait, what? |
^^^^ That is your personal opinion. Nothing more. In most states, refusal is the equivalent of a DUI. The reason being that drunks and substance abusers used to be able to not cooperate with law enforcement knowing that a DUI/DWI case was not winnable without test results or at least field sobriety probably cause. I have had similar situations where I was able to articulate impairment without a tested bac or SFST's based on my knowledge, training, and experience and observations. Springsteen is a douchebag and thought his "boss" image would carry the day. “Remember to get vaccinated or a vaccinated person might get sick from a virus they got vaccinated against because you’re not vaccinated.” - author unknown | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 3 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |