quote:

Originally posted by kkina:

quote:

Now that he's beaten the criminal charges does that give him immunity from civil charges?

It didn't protect O.J., so no.

quote:

Originally posted by slosig:

quote:

Originally posted by kkina:

quote:

Now that he's beaten the criminal charges does that give him immunity from civil charges?

It didn't protect O.J., so no.

Wouldn’t that be a state law thing. I believe there are some states (not Kommiefornia) where if you are found not guilty criminally you are shielded from civil liability. No idea what WI law is on this.

quote:

Originally posted by kkina:

quote:

Originally posted by slosig:

quote:

Originally posted by kkina:

quote:

Now that he's beaten the criminal charges does that give him immunity from civil charges?

It didn't protect O.J., so no.

Wouldn’t that be a state law thing. I believe there are some states (not Kommiefornia) where if you are found not guilty criminally you are shielded from civil liability. No idea what WI law is on this.

That I don't know. I don't even play a lawyer on tv.

quote:

Originally posted by P-220:
God Bless you Kyle.

MSM go fuck yourself!

quote:

Originally posted by P220 Smudge:

quote:

Originally posted by 2PAK:
The guy in biggest world of Sh*t, is the one who purchased the rifle for KR. That's a big federal charge especially if they want to make an example of you, which they will want to do.

I think you think it's a straw purchase. That's not what happened here. If there's a riot in my town and it's bad enough I'm arming the neighbors who don't have a rifle or shotguns, that's a whole other scenario.

quote:

Originally posted by parabellum:

quote:

Originally posted by 2PAK:
The guy in biggest world of Sh*t, is the one who purchased the rifle for KR. That's a big federal charge especially if they want to make an example of you, which they will want to do.

What are you talking about?

quote:

Originally posted by kkina:

quote:

Now that he's beaten the criminal charges does that give him immunity from civil charges?

It didn't protect O.J., so no.

quote:

Originally posted by P220 Smudge:

quote:

Originally posted by 2PAK:
The guy in biggest world of Sh*t, is the one who purchased the rifle for KR. That's a big federal charge especially if they want to make an example of you, which they will want to do.

I think you think it's a straw purchase. That's not what happened here. If there's a riot in my town and it's bad enough I'm arming the neighbors who don't have a rifle or shotguns, that's a whole other scenario.

quote:

Originally posted by TXJIM:...Kyle testified that he wanted a gun after going shooting with a friend at some time prior to the riots. He later asked the friend to buy him a gun and keep it for him to use with the plan to transfer it privately after Kyle turned 18. He said he gave the friend the money to buy the AR he eventually used that night.

quote:

Originally posted by Hildur:

quote:

Originally posted by kkina:

quote:

Now that he's beaten the criminal charges does that give him immunity from civil charges?

It didn't protect O.J., so no.

Some states with stand your ground laws exempt the shooter from civil lawsuits if the shooting was justified and no conviction of any criminal charges.

quote:

Originally posted by DoctorSolo:

quote:

Originally posted by kkina:

quote:

Originally posted by slosig:

quote:

Originally posted by kkina:

quote:

Now that he's beaten the criminal charges does that give him immunity from civil charges?

It didn't protect O.J., so no.

Wouldn’t that be a state law thing. I believe there are some states (not Kommiefornia) where if you are found not guilty criminally you are shielded from civil liability. No idea what WI law is on this.

That I don't know. I don't even play a lawyer on tv.

That's actually true and many of these new CCW "attorneys" dont want you to know.

OJ murdered an unarmed woman and her boyfriend over marital strife.

Kyle defended businesses from career criminals who caused an obvious and immediate threat to his own life, and in the end they fucked with the wrong guy.

You ok? Do I need to draw a picture to clarify the self-defense, justified deadly-force distinction here?

quote:

Originally posted by sigmonkey:

quote:

Originally posted by TXJIM:...Kyle testified that he wanted a gun after going shooting with a friend at some time prior to the riots. He later asked the friend to buy him a gun and keep it for him to use with the plan to transfer it privately after Kyle turned 18. He said he gave the friend the money to buy the AR he eventually used that night.

Kyle was not the "ultimate possessor".

As I understand the testimony and other facts, the "person" (Dominique Black) purchased the firearm, and maintained lawful possession of the firearm, in Wisconsin. Kyle and he agreed that the gun would be transferred to Kyle upon his 18th birthday.

Kyle travelled from Illinois to Wisconsin and picked up the rifle, and had it in his immediate possession the night of the Riots/shooting.

That does not mean he was in "absolute" possession" as it was at that time a "borrowed" firearm that was owned/possessed in the state of Wisconsin by Dominique Black.

I do not see a "straw purchase", but I do understand how someone might make the wrong assumption that it was.

If Kyle gave Dominique the money and Dominique made the purchase and then handed the firearm over to Kyle and Kyle maintained "absolute" possession, it would then be both a "straw purchase" and a violation of transporting a weapon across state line from Wisconsin to Illinois as a permanent possession by Kyle. (which did not happen)

quote:

Originally posted by RichardC:
'Colin Kaepernick says Rittenhouse verdict 'validates the need to abolish our current system'

Colin Kaepernick responded to the Kyle Rittenhouse verdict in a tweet on Friday, stating that "this only further validates the need to abolish our current system."
Colin Kaepernick responded to the Kyle Rittenhouse verdict on Friday night, stating that the decision validated "the terroristic acts of a white supremacist."

"This only further validates the need to abolish our current system. White supremacy cannot be reformed," he tweeted
_____________________________________________



'New York City Mayor-Elect Eric Adams on Kyle Rittenhouse verdict: 'We should not be shocked'

New York City Mayor-Elect Eric Adams released a statement Friday night responding to the Kyle Rittenhouse verdict, which determined Rittenhouse is not guilty on all charges.

Eric Adams tweeted "We should not be shocked. We should be focused on swift and righteous action."'

Maybe the EFF Bee Eye should be investigating these domestic terrorist threats.

https://www.foxnews.com/live-n...ttenhouse-trial-jury

quote:

Originally posted by parabellum:

quote:

Originally posted by 2PAK:
The guy in biggest world of Sh*t, is the one who purchased the rifle for KR. That's a big federal charge especially if they want to make an example of you, which they will want to do.

What are you talking about?