That whole Jen Psaki response was good. She is very good. So infuriatingly good. I cannot listen or read what she says without the ability to control my emotions. Her condescension, matter-of-fact calm tone, and inflections on particular words bring out pure hate for her.

Few humans and roles are as inherently vile and untrustworthy as the Press Secretary for a Presidential Administration, any Administration. Their entire job and purpose in life is to spin the stories for effect. Master Wordsmiths and Manipulators, never to be trusted, never to be believed, and utterly incapable of straight talk.

The Venn Diagram between Press Secretaries, Sleazy Attorneys, Cult Leaders, and the spokespeople for Dictators is nearly a single perfect circle.

saw this on the Rekieta Law youtube

from a doc:

This one should be interesting! I feel bad for the jury in cases like these - due to the situation they are in and that's not the way our legal system is supposed to work. Hopefully the jury makes some rational decisions, but I worked on a case once where a gang banger literally identified himself by his street/gang name in a recorded jailhouse video call, and the jury decided that since they were unsure if he was still an active gang member...they couldn't decide on a verdict (eye roll).

quote:

Originally posted by flashguy:
I haven't followed the trial closely, getting my news mostly from SF. Fox News had done a fair job of putting forth some of the details, too, and their coverage pretty much agrees with what has been presented here.

I think the general consensus is that, aside from closing arguments, the defense did an admirable job of trying to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory, but Rittenhouse is so obviously not guilty and the prosecution was so obviously corrupt and inept that he’s likely to be acquitted anyway.

Personally, I think it’s mostly a toss-up between a hung jury and acquittal. I think I remember hearing that if the verdict comes back guilty, Rittenhouse might have grounds for appeal due to prosecutorial misconduct, but IANAL.

Anybody here wondering if the Jury is considering what is on tonight's menu (provided they are be sequestered) before coming back with their ruling?

"Look - they're putting us up in that hotel down the street. I've been there and their burgers are AWESOME - and faster than Jack-in-the-Box."

I noted earlier that they had KFC for lunch. They deserve something catered from some of Kenosha's sit down venues. I have had people tell me they like being sequestered and staying in upscale hotels that are nicer than their homes.

quote:

Originally posted by LS1 GTO:
Anybody here wondering if the Jury is considering what is on tonight's menu (provided they are be sequestered) before coming back with their ruling?

"Look - they're putting us up in that hotel down the street. I've been there and their burgers are AWESOME - and faster than Jack-in-the-Box."

They are not sequestered…

I'm not sure who that fella is in the video but he nailed it.

Hopefully he is acquitted.

Goes back to high school and gets his diploma. Being a high school drop out is not something one wants on their resume.

quote:

Originally posted by old rugged cross:
Hopefully he is acquitted.

Goes back to high school and gets his diploma. Being a high school drop out is not something one wants on their resume.

He is already in university.

disregard

did he not drop out from high school? If not, my mistake.

Awhile ago the jury asked for eleven (11) copies of the first six pages of the jury instruction.

Those pages detail the privilege's regarding self-defense.

....and still no word from Black Rifle Coffee Company, whose CEO had plenty to say a few months ago. Jerks!

quote:

Originally posted by radioman:
....and still no word from Black Rifle Coffee Company, whose CEO had plenty to say a few months ago. Jerks!

I've heard-read all I need to from those fake patriots.

So can someone post and circle where Kyle was pointing/aiming gun that the prosecution claimed provocation?

I simply don't see it. How can that be irrefutable evidence?

quote:

Originally posted by saigonsmuggler:
So can someone post and circle where Kyle was pointing/aiming gun that the prosecution claimed provocation?

I simply don't see it. How can that be irrefutable evidence?

Asshat prosecutors like using words like “irrefutable” to lull jurors into believing it’s true.

Anyone here watch the prosecution closing argument. When they repeated that a skate board could not be considered a weapon. Somehow I wanted to smack him with one