Just ran across info on the songs performed at Hillary's campaign in Ohio.
Wow!
And she complains about Trumps language.

Jay-Z's repertoire Friday night included his hit 'FuckkWithMeYouKnowIGotIt.'
He also performed a song called 'Jigga My Nigga.

The songs had catchy lyrics:
'If you feelin' like a pimp nigga, go and brush your shoulders off.'
'Ladies is pimps too, go and brush your shoulders off. Nigga is crazy, baby, don't forget that boy told you. Get that dirt off your shoulders.'

869 pages of this thread has taught me that Trump knows exactly what he is doing. This election is going to break all molds and past modeling.

None of media truly understands the outcome of a man willing to truly be in the arena. The sheer determination of will, and the power of a movement.

I think Trump is going to stomp the shit out of the electoral college on Tuesday, and I'm positive there will be some good surprises!

quote:

The songs had catchy lyrics:
'If you feelin' like a pimp nigga, go and brush your shoulders off.'
'Ladies is pimps too, go and brush your shoulders off. Nigga is crazy, baby, don't forget that boy told you. Get that dirt off your shoulders.'

Stolen out of Hayn's symphony 94?... classless performance by a classless performer, produced by a classless group of fucks for an ignorant, clueless audience.

quote:

Originally posted by Ironbutt:
I think it's time for Donald & The Hag to go home & give it a rest. Everybody who's going to vote on Tuesday decided long ago who they're going to vote for & neither of them are going to change anybody's mind. If there are still any undecided voters out there, they're too stupid to vote in the first place.

You got to be shitting me,I just got a hag supporter hang up on me minutes ago as I was trying to educating her on crooked hillery.
The bitches minions are desperate,what was also funny as her surprise that I sounded WHITE

Beautiful video, this is Trump:





Link to original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pm8n9qVIK_8

this election is going to be a repudiation of the media as it is of the Hildebeast

the media is going to be absolutely crushed on Tuesday - no matter how they want to spin it, they're done as in impartial source of information

they've worked themselves into a corner where everything they say is now suspect - no matter what the topic

they all forgot that they weren't supposed to be part of the process, they were supposed to make sure it was fair

^^^ I agree. There will be two casualties of this campaign: the "media" is done, their credibility gone. The Republican Party is dead in the water.

The Trump Campaign has canceled tomorrow's rally in the Milwaukee area and will instead go to Minneapolis and then a suburb of Detroit.

The chess game is coming to a close.

Let's just be thankful it's Hillary who Trump is running against. I bet Bernie would be up by 10 points or more at this point.

quote:

Originally posted by Mainframe Coder:
The Trump Campaign has canceled tomorrow's rally in the Milwaukee area and will instead go to Minneapolis and then a suburb of Detroit.

The chess game is coming to a close.

MN, I thought that was solid Blue territory -- look at their senators etc.

quote:

Originally posted by Mainframe Coder:
The Trump Campaign has canceled tomorrow's rally in the Milwaukee area and will instead go to Minneapolis and then a suburb of Detroit.

The chess game is coming to a close.

Do you mean they scheduled WI to make hillary go there when really they were going to MN?

quote:

Originally posted by justjoe:
^^^ I agree. There will be two casualties of this campaign: the "media" is done, their credibility gone. The Republican Party is dead in the water.

If we win the casualities of this battle will be: the entire Bernie movement and much of the Democratic Party, the MSMedia, Hillary, and much of the GOP.

It couldn't happen to a more deserving group, either.

Preaching to the choir here but please send this to everyone you know. I believe this could go down in history, as the most corrupt two people ever.




WSJ: You Know The IRS Should Be Investigating The Clinton Foundation

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/m...-foundation-n2239457

Prior to Halloween, The Wall Street Journal asked a very good question: why isn’t the IRS investigating the Clinton Foundation? Leaving out the obvious political stains from their scandal, in which they targeted conservative organizations seeking tax-exempt status, it’s a legitimate inquiry. Wikileaks was able to shed light on what top Bill Clinton aide Doug Band, who helped start the Clinton Foundation and went on to co-found his own consulting firm, Teneo, called Bill Clinton, Inc. The 13-page memo described how money could be obtained to go to both the Clinton Foundation and to the Clintons personally. That strategy centered on using the Foundation’s top tier donor base (Dow Chemical, Coca-Cola, etc.) to also forge paid speaking engagements and consulting deals. The amount that Bill could personally reap with this strategy could be as much as $66 million if everything remained in place.

…Mr. Band went ahead and described the “unorthodox nature” of his work while emphasizing his determination to help “protect the 501(c)3 status of the Foundation.” That’s the part of the tax code that has allowed the Clinton Foundation to remain tax-exempt on the premise that it is dedicated to serving humanity.

Mr. Band graciously copied John Podesta, then adviser to the board, who would eventually become Hillary’s campaign chief. His helpful reply was to suggest that Mr. Band “strip the defensive stuff out” and later “go through the details and how they have helped WJC” [ William Jefferson Clinton].

The Band memo reveals exactly what critics of the Clintons have long said: They make little distinction between the private and public aspects of their lives, between the pursuit of personal enrichment, the operation of a nonprofit, and participation in U.S. politics.

Mr. Band writes that he and his colleague Justin Cooper “have, for the past ten years, served as the primary contact and point of management for President Clinton’s activities—which span from political activity (e.g., campaigning on behalf of candidates for elected office), to business activity (e.g., providing advisory services to business entities with which he has a consulting arrangement), to Foundation activity.”

Mr. Band’s memo confirms that donors were not seeking merely to help the sick and the poor. He explains that the Clinton Foundation had “engaged an array of fundraising consultants” over the past decade but “these engagements have not resulted in significant new dollars for the Foundation.” In other words, it wasn’t working as a conventional charity.

Mr. Band then explains how he and his Teneo partner Declan Kelly had to carry the fundraising load, and did so by packaging foundation solicitations with other services such as a meeting with Bill Clinton, $450,000 speeches or strategic advice. Many of the donations, from U.S. companies like Coca-Cola and Dow Chemical and foreign firms like UBS and Barclays, occurred while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State.


MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough described the whole matter as a “shakedown.” Mediaite noted that co-host Mika Brzezinski said the whole affair put the Clinton Foundation in a scandalous light in a “kind of morally deficit kind of way, a sleazy way.” The ironic thing here is that none of this would have come to light if Chelsea Clinton weren’t worried about aides hustling business (via Politico):

Chelsea Clinton sent a fiery email to a group of top Clinton advisers, detailing allegations about aides she said were undermining the family, including by possibly misrepresenting their expenses and blurring the line between a family-linked consulting firm and the Clinton Foundation.

[…]

In the email, Chelsea Clinton says the allegations made her “very sad,” though she acknowledges that she cannot attest to the veracity of all of them and that there are likely other “sides” to the claims. Still, she says she raised the concerns with her parents. And, as part of her efforts to “professionalize the Foundation,” she wrote, she was passing along the allegations to the recipients of the email — Podesta, longtime Hillary Clinton confidante Cheryl Mills and two officials from Simpson Thacher, a law firm that had been commissioned to audit the Clinton Foundation.

At the time of the email, Chelsea Clinton was pushing to enact tougher internal rules at the Clinton Foundation regarding conflicts of interest and outside income.

This brought her into conflict with Mr. Band, but that’s a tale for another time.

Trump will speak in Reno in about 30 minutes or so. Amazingly, this isn't the last rally of the day. He leaves here and goes to Denver.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQMUj6ETaNg

quote:

Originally posted by radioman:

MN, I thought that was solid Blue territory -- look at their senators etc.

Nope, just a very consistent slim majority concentrated in approximately 1% of the state's land area.

quote:

Originally posted by dusty3030:

quote:

Originally posted by Mainframe Coder:

Across the liberal media, the mood, the tone, the enthusiasm, is gone. These people work in the media full-time and they know how to read the landscape very well. They know what's about to happen on Tuesday. You can hear it in their voices and see it on their faces.

I hope all them bastards are singing the blues.





Link to original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BPlsqo2bk2M

How can the thrill be gone?

There was never any thrill to begin with, with Hillary. She was a dud from day 1.

It Was An Accounting Error: Pro-Clinton Super PAC Accepted Illegal Donations

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/m...l-donations-n2241899

But they returned the money.

Still, it doesn’t negate the fact that a pro-Clinton super PAC accepted illegal campaign contributions from a charity connected to a Massachusetts’s-based construction firm with federal contracts. The amount of the donations totaled $250,000. Correct The Record, the super PAC in question, says it has returned the money. The construction firm who gave the illegal donation is called Suffolk Construction Company Inc., which is the largest private construction company in the country, according to The Center for Public Integrity (CPI). A spokesperson for the company told CPI that the donations were an “accounting error.”

Suffolk Cares Inc., a nonprofit charity registered under section 501(c)(3) of federal tax code, gave Correct the Record $100,000 on Sept. 8 and another $150,000 on Oct. 12, according to federal campaign finance documents. Charities of this kind are explicitly prohibited from making political contributions under federal law.

[…]

Suffolk Cares Inc. is funded by Suffolk Construction Company Inc. and company chairman and CEO John Fish, according to the charity’s tax return for fiscal year 2015, its most recent. Fish is a major political donor who’s personally spread hundreds of thousands of dollars among various political candidates and groups, mostly Democratic.

[…]

The IRS states that "501(c)(3) organizations are absolutely prohibited from directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office."

[…]

The $250,000 Correct the Record is giving back to Suffolk Cares Inc. represents more than 8 percent of the super PAC’s income since July 1, federal campaign finance records indicate.

Launched as a stand-alone group in 2015 and based in Washington, D.C., Correct the Record is part of collection of political committees and nonprofits connected to David Brock, a one-time Clinton foe who in recent years has become one of her most loyal advocates.

[…]

“We have to end the flood of secret, unaccountable money that is distorting our election, corrupting our political process, drowning out the voices and votes of people,” Clinton said in a speech last year.

CPI also noted that this isn’t the first time Suffolk landed in trouble for their donations, pointing to another $200,000 check they gave to another pro-Clinton PAC Priorities USA. This time it came from the company proper back in July (via The Hill):

A super-PAC supporting Hillary Clinton has refunded $200,000 in contributions from a company that had contracts with the federal government.

Priorities USA returned the donation after a story appeared in The Hill highlighting how the ban on political contributions from business groups holding federal contracts is frequently skirted.

In a statement, Suffolk Construction said Priorities USA had returned the donation.

“Based on our internal accounting, the contract appeared to be completed as the project was over four years ago," Dan Antonellis of the Boston-based company said in a statement to The Hill.

"We notified the Committee of this ambiguity and they decided to return their contribution.”

A spokesman for the super-PAC, Priorities USA, confirmed that it had given back the funds.

Companies that hold contracts with the federal government are banned from making political contributions.

For the Correct The Record incident, Suffolk Cares delivered a check of $100,000 on September 8 and another $150,000 donation on October 12. That’s a pretty steep accounting error. Also, Clinton's remarks in conjunction with this is...I mean, you just can't make this up.

quote:

Originally posted by PASig:

quote:

Originally posted by dusty3030:

quote:

Originally posted by Mainframe Coder:

Across the liberal media, the mood, the tone, the enthusiasm, is gone. These people work in the media full-time and they know how to read the landscape very well. They know what's about to happen on Tuesday. You can hear it in their voices and see it on their faces.

I hope all them bastards are singing the blues.





Link to original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BPlsqo2bk2M

How can the thrill be gone?

There was never any thrill to begin with, with Hillary. She was a dud from day 1.

Well, plainly the progressives were thrilled once.

quote:

Originally posted by ridewv:
Let's just be thankful it's Hillary who Trump is running against. I bet Bernie would be up by 10 points or more at this point.

Seriously Clark? I just can't even fathom that to be the case.

Hillary Is a Cheater

http://townhall.com/columnists...s-a-cheater-n2241765

Not too long ago, Democrats were the ones claiming elections were stolen.

While serving as Ohio Secretary of State, I saw wild accusations and ridiculous lawsuits from Democrats and left-wing advocacy groups in an attempt to delegitimize election results.

The conspiracy theories of Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., the late Gore Vidal, and liberal blogs grew into something widely promoted by prominent elected Democrats.

Liberal Rep. John Conyers (D-MI), who is now running for his 27th term in Congress, held outrageous hearings and even produced a taxpayer-funded, 142-page report detailing these tin-foil-hat accusations. By fairly enforcing state election laws during a year with record-breaking turnout, local election officials and I were accused by Conyers of suppressing votes through “intentional misconduct and illegal behavior.”

Conyer’s efforts was a publicity stunt which spun out of control. By spreading distrust in the democratic system, liberals started believing President George W. Bush and senior advisor Karl Rove could control election results from their secret bunker in Texas.

For the most part, the mainstream media blew up these stupid lies.

My, how things have changed!

Now, Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump is claiming the 2016 election is “rigged.” Suddenly, the political establishment, mainstream media, and liberal pundits have changed their tune.

Repeatedly, Trump’s accusations have been called “dangerous demagoguery,” “playing with fire,” and even “unpatriotic.”
CARTOONS | Chip Bok
View Cartoon

Dozens of Republican election officials across the country have rejected Trump’s accusations. My predecessor Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted indignantly announced, “I am in charge of elections in Ohio, and they're not going to be rigged. I'll make sure of that.”

But 2004 is not 2016. And I am convinced the integrity of the 2016 election is actually under assault.

Published by WikiLeaks, thousands of leaked emails from Hillary Clinton’s campaign show that her team is perfectly capable of rigging the election.

We now have a firm grasp of Hilary’s unethical ties to Wall Street, the mainstream media, foreign despots, and even the FBI agents involved in her criminal investigation. Now, she is using that vast, corrupt network to rig an election against a candidate who received more primary votes than any Republican in history.

First, emails showed then-DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz actively engaged in a strategy to rig the election for Hillary. DNC money was coordinated with Hillary’s campaign, and Hillary’s staff had the final say in all DNC hires. We watched as Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) won the popular vote in state after state, only to be overruled by DNC superdelegates who just happened to be Clinton-insiders.

Schultz, along with CEO Amy Dacey, chief finance officer Brad Marshall, and communications director Luis Miranda were all forced resigned after WikiLeaks exposed their coordination with Hillary’s campaign.

Then, WikiLeaks exposed Schultz’s DNC replacement Donna Brazile, a long-time Clinton hack who was just fired by CNN for leaking television debate questions to Hillary Clinton in advance.

Team Hillary shamelessly rigged debates. And while the media’s bias in favor of the Clinton’s is extensive, this was actual cheating. The fix was in, and Sanders never stood a chance.

For the campaign against Trump, we have read messages showing Hillary’s campaign chair actively encouraging illegal aliens to vote in states that provide them drivers licenses. In addition, an extensive network of illegal aliens has been hired to register in targeted areas, expanding the likelihood of more voter fraud.

In Virginia, Colorado, Texas, Illinois, and many other states election fraud is happening on a scale never imagined before. Thanks to motor voter laws and early voting, many examples of deceased voters casting ballots have been exposed. In the meantime, votes for people who have lived in multiple states are counted. One frequent practice noticed by election officials has been "vote harvesting," where signatures are obtained illegally to cast ballots without the voters' consent.

According to a Pew Charitable Trust report from 2012, one in eight voter registrations are significantly inaccurate “or no longer valid.” There are more than 146 million Americans registered to vote, which means at least 18 million are invalid. With almost 3 million people registered in multiple states and 2 million deceased individuals still on the rolls, the chances for fraud are more widespread than ever.

Hillary is good at rigging things and her friends at the Department of Justice have control of her FBI Investigation. If Hillary was anyone else in the government, she could not get a security clearance and would face serious prison time. But WikiLeaks shows that the State Department and the White House worked closely with Hillary’s campaign to explain her illegally used home email server. Not only did Hillary help raise money for an FBI agent’s wife who was running for office, her campaign chairman was a close friend with another top agent.

FBI Director James Comey only changed direction on the investigation due to internal pressure caused by Anthony Weiner’s laptop. Now, the FBI has waited so long that America will not know the details of the newly discovered messages before Election Day.

Hillary Clinton’s campaign is a criminal enterprise, and her ability to get away with corruption is unprecedented. Her defeat at the polls must be greater than her margin of corruption.