Donald Trump is a first-rate ass clown, but...

October 17, 2016, 01:29 PM

sdy

O’Keefe Video Sting Exposes ‘Bird-Dogging’ — Democrats’ Effort to Incite Violence at Trump Rallies

http://www.breitbart.com/big-g...ce-at-trump-rallies/

Democrats have used trained provocateurs to instigate violence at Republican events nationwide throughout the 2016 election cycle, including at several Donald Trump rallies, using a tactic called “bird-dogging,” according to a new video investigation released Monday by James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas.

The goal of “bird-dogging”: to create a sense of “anarchy” around Donald Trump that would undermine his political support. Often, the tactic uses the most vulnerable people — including the elderly and disabled — to maximize shock value.

https://youtu.be/5IuJGHuIkzY

video highly recommended to watch

October 17, 2016, 01:31 PM

Tonyny

There is sufficient evidence that elections in the US are rigged, or purposely manipulated to achieve whatever outcome is desired. Here are a few factors:

* Corrupt "election" statutes and codes;
* Partisan delegate stacking and convention tricks;
* Encouragements and enticements for illegals to vote;
* Electronic vote fraud via relatively simple hacking;
* Vote-by-mail schemes that are absurd on their face;
* Allowing state agents to secretly transport ballots to counting centers without citizen poll watchers accompanying them;
* Poor security in counting areas;
* Forcing citizens to pay for recounting costs, making them prohibitive (and irrelevant because most of the fraud happens too early to be identified in an audit afterward);
* Corrupt courts and media that back up the "official" results without question.

Ultimately, when the people on the ballot are solely responsible for transporting, counting, and reporting on, the ballots, it should be viewed as a pathetic joke and insult. Saddam Hussein's "elelctions" were at least as verifiable as are these "elections".

October 17, 2016, 01:35 PM

Pal

A little off the current topic. Yesterday Mrs. Pal and I were coming back from Church when we noticed quite a few Trump signs had been vandalized. At the time I thought it would have the opposite effect that what was intended. Mrs. Pal thought they must indeed be desperate. Today it was the talk of facebook in our small town and by this afternoon there were even more Trump signs out.

As I said a couple of pages ago I share Para's view that most people have decided who to vote for. I think it will come down to who gets their people out to vote.

I have quit listening the much of the news. It's amazing that we give these people so much latitude. I did like some of the articles posted here yesterday regarding polls.

Jim

October 17, 2016, 01:36 PM

ryan81986

October 17, 2016, 01:39 PM

oddball

quote:
Originally posted by sdy:
O’Keefe Video Sting Exposes ‘Bird-Dogging’ — Democrats’ Effort to Incite Violence at Trump Rallies

I was going to post this story.

To add, O'Keefe is the guy who made the cockroaches scatter with his video expose on ACORN.

His new investigation clearly shows the money trail, from the Clinton campaign, to the DNC, all the way down to guys causing violence at Trump's rallies.

And of course the MSM will not touch this with a 50 foot pole

October 17, 2016, 01:43 PM

ChicagoSigMan

quote:
Originally posted by sdy:
O’Keefe Video Sting Exposes ‘Bird-Dogging’ — Democrats’ Effort to Incite Violence at Trump Rallies

http://www.breitbart.com/big-g...ce-at-trump-rallies/

Democrats have used trained provocateurs to instigate violence at Republican events nationwide throughout the 2016 election cycle, including at several Donald Trump rallies, using a tactic called “bird-dogging,” according to a new video investigation released Monday by James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas.

The goal of “bird-dogging”: to create a sense of “anarchy” around Donald Trump that would undermine his political support. Often, the tactic uses the most vulnerable people — including the elderly and disabled — to maximize shock value.

https://youtu.be/5IuJGHuIkzY

video highly recommended to watch

Project Veritas is doing some amazing investigative journalism. They put the MSM to shame. Like many of their previous videos, this one is a blockbuster and should be Yuge! But it won't be.

October 17, 2016, 01:55 PM

jhe888

quote:
Originally posted by Tonyny:
There is sufficient evidence that elections in the US are rigged, or purposely manipulated to achieve whatever outcome is desired. Here are a few factors:

* Corrupt "election" statutes and codes;
* Partisan delegate stacking and convention tricks;
* Encouragements and enticements for illegals to vote;
* Electronic vote fraud via relatively simple hacking;
* Vote-by-mail schemes that are absurd on their face;
* Allowing state agents to secretly transport ballots to counting centers without citizen poll watchers accompanying them;
* Poor security in counting areas;
* Forcing citizens to pay for recounting costs, making them prohibitive (and irrelevant because most of the fraud happens too early to be identified in an audit afterward);
* Corrupt courts and media that back up the "official" results without question.

Ultimately, when the people on the ballot are solely responsible for transporting, counting, and reporting on, the ballots, it should be viewed as a pathetic joke and insult. Saddam Hussein's "elelctions" were at least as verifiable as are these "elections".

All elections?

In my congressional district, the Republican congressman Kevin Brady will win by a landslide, as will just about every other Republican candidate.

Are those results rigged or manipulated?

Who the the "they" who rig the elections to the "desired" results? Why don't they rig all elections so their candidates win everywhere? If Brady's district is rigged, why don't they rig Shelia Jackson Lee's election so she doesn't win? Of if they are rigging Jackson Lee's election to get her in, why don't they jump 5 miles north and get a Democrat elected in my district?

October 17, 2016, 02:34 PM

justjoe

I heard a bit of the Limbaugh show last week, and he said something that I think is true: Hillary is so unlikeable that her campaign was not even going to try to make her an appealing person who might be a good leader. So their strategy was to make Trump even more unlikeable. The depths to which they have needed to claw shows what they are working with in Hillary.

October 17, 2016, 03:15 PM

JALLEN

quote:
Originally posted by jhe888:

If Brady's district is rigged, why don't they rig Shelia Jackson Lee's election so she doesn't win?

We could do that?

Luckily, I have enough willpower to control the driving ambition that rages within me.

When you had the votes, we did things your way. Now, we have the votes and you will be doing things our way. This lesson in political reality from Lyndon B. Johnson

"Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible." - Justice Janice Rogers Brown

October 17, 2016, 03:16 PM

SIG4EVA

quote:
Originally posted by JALLEN:
quote:
Originally posted by jhe888:

If Brady's district is rigged, why don't they rig Shelia Jackson Lee's election so she doesn't win?

We could do that?

If Guam can tip over with too many people like Hank Johnson said, anything is possible.

October 17, 2016, 03:19 PM

HRK

quote:
why don't they rig Shelia Jackson Lee's election so she doesn't win?

Why would the D rig an election to take out one of their own members.

October 17, 2016, 03:31 PM

sdy

wikileaks tweet:

We can confirm Ecuador cut off Assange's internet access Saturday, 5pm GMT, shortly after publication of Clinton's Goldman Sachs speechs.

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/...s/788099178832420865

October 17, 2016, 03:36 PM

justjoe

Whatever else Assange has, he needs to dump immediately.

October 17, 2016, 03:37 PM

JALLEN

quote:
Originally posted by HRK:
quote:
why don't they rig Shelia Jackson Lee's election so she doesn't win?

Why would the D rig an election to take out one of their own members.

Ahhh, go back and read it again. JHE was suggesting the Republicans must have rigged the balloting in his district to insure a landslide.

October 17, 2016, 03:57 PM

46and2

quote:
Originally posted by justjoe:
Whatever else Assange has, he needs to dump immediately.

Asssange and his people have already setup a "dead man's switch" mechanism by distributing an encrypted file with (purportedly) the clinton data itself and by distributing one of the two encryption keys needed to access the materials, in the event he is suddenly incommunicado for whatever reason - whether permanently/nefariously or simply due to technology issues, and (supposedly) if he's suddenly gone/unreachable then the second key will be released which then let's anyone open up the files and see what's inside.

As I understand it, it's already structured such that he personally doesn't have to do anything else, the encrypted file and first key are already out there and the second key is already in the hands of persons he can supposedly trust or on an automated system that requires him to check in periodically to prevent it from auto releasing the second key. The idea being, it wouldn't matter if he was killed, his internet was crashed, or the Ecuadorian Embassy was invaded, the second key or the information will be released one way or another.

Basically.