Topic ClosedGo | New | Find | Notify | Tools |
Ubique |
Too true. Some of the lefties can't even remember why they are outraged anymore, there has been so much BS flying they can't remember that Trump eats KFC with a knife and fork! Calgary Shooting Centre | |||
|
| Peace through superior firepower  |
Yes, it's only August, and the news media has whipped itself into such a frenzy, they've nothing left to do but keep repeating the same stuff. My hope is that enough voters have now become aware of and are fed up with these charlatans, and ignore all of their lies and put Trump in the White House. Wouldn't it be glorious? I'd tune in to CNN and MSNBC every night for two weeks after a Trump victory. Comedy Gold it would be. | |||
|
Bad dog! |
^^^ Yes, exactly.  ______________________________________________________ "You get much farther with a kind word and a gun than with a kind word alone." | |||
|
| Peace through superior firepower |
They'd have to have EMS standing by on the set, ready to defibrillate and revive the dying leftists. Dropping like flies, I tells ya! | |||
|
| Partial dichotomy |
http://www.proudcons.com/news-...ampaign=facebook_WNP Fox News Host STUNS Viewers with THIS URGENT Hillary Warning To America! ByProud ConservativePosted on August 4, 2016 carlson 24.9KSHARES COMMENTS It’s not too often we get to hear a news host make a claim on national television that is so definitive that you wonder if they will lose their job afterward, but that’s what just happened on “Fox & Friends,” when Tucker Carlson issued an urgent warning to Republicans who oppose Donald Trump. Hillary Clinton as president will change America forever, and not in a positive way. HERE IS WHAT CARLSON HAD TO SAY… “This is a pivot point in American history. If Hillary is elected – everyone is focused on her deficits as a person. The truth is it’s her policies. She’s going to open the borders, pack the Supreme Court and you are not going to have the same country. Maybe you like that, maybe you don’t. But we’re not going back to the status quo, period. And so Republicans need to understand if Trump loses, it is a new America, OK? A lot is on the line, whether you like him or not. That is real.” LISTEN TO TUCKER’S COMMENT HERE… We certainly agree with Tucker Carlson here. Republicans who oppose Trump need to take notice that if Hillary gets elected, our country will never be the same. Of course, Trump doesn’t make all Republican voters happy, but any Republican who is considering voting for Hillary over Trump needs to understand the catastrophic consequences she will have on our country. SIGforum: For all your needs! Imagine our influence if every gun owner in America was an NRA member! Click the box>>>  | |||
|
| Member |
I don't get why that's considered stunning. Unless you consider honest reporting stunning. | |||
|
Member |
I'm not so sure. I think they'd be texting their "I Need A New Angle To Stay On Message" department with statements posed as questions such as: "This could not have happened?" . . . and so on. It would probably be Trump's first day as the failed president-elect. . . . and that's just from the Republicans already lined up for 2020.  We should face the fact that Trump's presidency will be a constant misinformation/negative campaign by the same ones who are stuck on it now, including the media. _______________________________ NRA Life Member NRA Certified Range Safety Officer | |||
|
| Member |
A concern to all honest hard working Americans that desire making America the best place on earth is lost on our media promoting an unindited felon who is determined to racially divide our people through pandering, blatant lies, memory loss, all the while lining her pockets bemoaning the 1% she has become. I truly don't understand how so many people can remain un-informed, choosing to remain comatose, not wanting to assimilate into our great country. I recall seeing a map of the U.S.A (on this forum) showing the different states redrawn by race & non-contributing free loaders. That map seemed so far fetched, but now I'm not so sure. I'm 70 years old, will always love our country, I wish more people felt the same. I hope I don't come across negative, I'm just really pissed off!! | |||
|
| Member |
They're tearing him down so they can build him up again. Then when he wins, they can say "We knew it all along". | |||
|
| Oh stewardess, I speak jive.  |
It's important to understand and remember that FOX, CNN, MSNBC, Rush, Beck, HuffPo, Breitbart, et al, are first and foremost in the Entertainment business, of the so-called Infotainment variety, and this focus is both philosophical and a legal distinction as they are NOT primarily in the News business and are not legally bound to report truthfully or without bias. This ambiguity is by design on their part, and intentionally obfuscated, and it is true no matter how clearly or how often the word "News" is (mostly-falsely) associated with each. They may have a facade and pretense of being real Journalists whose primary focus is reporting the News, but it is simply untrue in every sense of the word. And this is just as true whether we like what they're "reporting" or not. It doesn't matter who the writer or reporter is, you simply cannot, basically - ever, expect that what you're getting is true / objective Journalism of a traditional variety. It is mostly Entertainment, on purpose... Every one of them may as well be The View redux for targeted audiences (because Ad Revenue is really what they're all about), even though many of them dress up the sets and delivery and pretend to be Newscasters and real Journalists. FOX skated under the radar for a while, and found a large audience because they were telling people in an untapped media market more of what they wanted to hear, though they've thrown the veil off entirely during this election cycle and shown their true colors, too. Expecting otherwise is folly, and the only thing new about it lately is the degree to which it's true and the brazenness of those doing the talking, writing, and scheming. | |||
|
Only the strong survive |
 Oh why, Oh why...would you do that. They will just breed again and produce more leftists. I have enough trouble with two of them living on both sides of one place.  They think they can do no wrong. And what about the EMS people....it's their duty even though they don't like it. Sometimes they move a little slow when one of them drops. 41 41 | |||
|
Info Guru |
But...It's NOT just entertainment. If it was entertainment and ratings/dollars driven, there would be several competitors copying Fox News and trying to get those viewers/dollars. If a network news department switched to a real news, semi-objective, air both sides of an issue format it would clean up in ratings and dollars. It would absolutely put the other networks out of business and the people in charge of these networks and news divisions know this to be true. What we have here is years and years of journalism schools actively teaching students that their job is to advocate and force change. This is not a hidden agenda, one can simply look at the curriculum of J schools and it is plainly out in the open. Ever since Watergate the objective has been to advance progressivism no matter the cost. I tapped out during the Clinton years. The last time I watched a network news broadcast was during Desert Shield/Desert storm. I attempted to check the live coverage of the Ferguson riots and quickly learned that I could get better information online like I usually do. Better live shots without the inane commentary. I don't even know what channels the cable news networks are on. “Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.” - John Adams | |||
|
| Banned |
Reince Priebus appeared with Trump this evening in Altoona, PA, to put to rest that he and Trump have discussed defunding, etc. They made it VERY CLEAR that the entire thing was the fabrication of the media. There is no feud between the two at all. The liberal media will create anything they can between now and November 8th to help Hillary. They have free reign to lie as much as necessary to assure a victory. Understand that and don't be their foot soldier. | |||
|
Step by step walk the thousand mile road |
Remember folks, if he wins the general election on November 8, 2016, there will be legal contests that will make those of Bush (43) vs. Gore look like small claims court cases. If, having survived that process, Trump manages to accrue the necessary 270 votes in the Electoral College on December 19, 2016, I bet there will be lawsuits filed challenging everything, including the Constitutionality of the Electoral College process. And then, if he managed to get this far, he has to make it to around 1300 EST on January 20, 2017, when he completes the following statement: "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." And if we get to that point, we need Noah 2.0 and the Ark II because the liberal tears will be like a biblical flood. Nice is overrated "It's every freedom-loving individual's duty to lie to the government." Airsoftguy, June 29, 2018 | |||
|
| Free radical scavenger  |
Hillary is showing up on Fox News because Mark Cuban advised her to: http://ftw.usatoday.com/2016/0...vice-hillary-clinton And she even introduced a "real person" surrogate at the DNC. CNN is running Breaking News reruns today: "Khan asks McCain to withdraw Trump support". (I won't bother with a URL to today's rehash.) As for Hitler and the Nazis on the former Military Channel, I actually learned a lot of world history from watching that and especially the series on "The Great War". But yes, the reruns aren't interesting. Like others on here, I don't watch much "national news" on TV and let others share selected excerpts. The last "national news" that I saw was when I turned on the TV one morning and saw/heard an unprepared Tom Brokaw babbling about banning "AR14s" on "Meet the Press." I turned off the TV and then checked online to see what had happened. | |||
|
| Member |
I am curious about your point here. Are you saying or implying that the MSM must legally report "truthfully and without bias" because they are in the news business as opposed to entertainment? Please, if you will, expand on your thoughts, if so. If the MSM had to answer for untruthfulness and bias, there would need to be a regulatory agency that had the volume capacity of a black hole. O.K. . . . at least something moving toward that kind of capacity. ABC, CBS & NBC. Are these the MSM outlets that you say must, by law, report truthfully and without bias - unlike cable? Do you have a citation for your legal proposition? Even the equal time rule has loads of exceptions but that rule does not refer to truthfulness or unbiased reporting. Dan Rather, Brian Williams and the list goes on were not in any sense unbiased and, in clear cases, truthful. _______________________________ NRA Life Member NRA Certified Range Safety Officer | |||
|
| Banned |
In what you bolded, I think he would have been correct had the word "legally" been replaced by "ethically." There is no "legal" mandate for the news media to report "truthfully or without bias." Their only judge is the court of public opinion. | |||
|
Admin/Odd Duck |
No one said the defibrillators needed to be placed around the heart. There are other places they could be put on which would negatively affect their breeding. ____________________________________________________ New and improved super concentrated me: Proud rebel, heretic, and Oneness Apostolic Pentecostal. There is iron in my words of death for all to see. So there is iron in my words of life. | |||
|
safe & sound |
Voting for Trump is good enough for me. What isn't good enough for me is the persistent negativity. I don't care who anybody voted for in the primary. I have an employee like this with restaurants. Doesn't matter where we go. Doesn't matter how good things are. He will bend over backwards to find something to complain about.
How about we just ignore the media reports about what's going on in the campaign? Instead of posting all of the negative crap that others have reported, why not post your personal observations?
Who voted for who in the primary doesn't matter. What does matter is who's promulgating false and potentially damaging information. Why is it so difficult to focus on the positive for some of you? | |||
|
Political Cynic |
when you consider the media being a shill for the democrats, you're making an assumption that republicans are distinctly different, and that hasn't been in evidence in 8 years republicans and democrats are the same coin - just different sides Trump is the outsider - he's not on the coin the only thing that makes any sense is that both the republicans and the democrats want Hillary to win their actions post convention point to no other conclusion [B] Against ALL enemies, foreign and DOMESTIC | |||
|
| Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 ... 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 ... 1312 |
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Topic Closed© SIGforum 2024