quote:

Originally posted by WaterburyBob:
This thread will probably hit 2 million views by the first of the year.
Pretty impressive - just like the President-Elect!

Goin' straight up to Jeebus on a rocket ship!

The thread took sixteen months to hit one million page views and will hit the second million in a two month interval.

quote:

Originally posted by WaterburyBob:
This thread will probably hit 2 million views by the first of the year.
Pretty impressive - just like the President-Elect!

I think the 2 millionth post should be reserved for Para.

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:

quote:

The Wisconsin recount was expected to conclude Monday. With about 95 percent of the votes recounted as of Sunday, Clinton had gained 25 votes on Trump, but still trailed by about 22,000 votes out of nearly 3 million cast in Wisconsin.

What an incredible waste of money.

Yeah, but it was liberal money. I am glad Soros and company wasted some cash there instead of being able to spend it elsewhere. BTW, where DOES he get all of his money anyway?



.

quote:

Originally posted by WaterburyBob:
This thread will probably hit 2 million views by the first of the year.
Pretty impressive - just like the President-Elect!

True dat. And I'm chompin at the bit to drop the "elect" part.

Two separate comments:

1. The final WI recount was Trump +162 votes

2. "The head of Intelligence is (was) James Clapper who oversees the 17 agencies in question, and it was his assessment that Russia played a part in the hacking"

Totally agree. That is why I said let's have each of the 17 agencies put in writing their unique position on the topic.

Who are the 17 intel agencies that fall under DNI (James Clapper)?

Office of Director of National Intel (Clapper)
Air Force
Army
CIA
Coast Guard
DIA
Dept of Energy
Dept of Homeland Security
Dept of State
Dept of Treasury
Drug Enforcement Administration
FBI
Marine Corps
National Geospatial-Intelligence
National Reconnaissance Office
National Security Agency
Navy Intelligence


I would especially be interested in seeing the Coast Guard Intel analysis of Russian hacking the election.

Also the AF, Army, Navy, and Marine analysis.

Maybe the DEA, National Geo, and National Recon intel analysis.

I can't believe that the 16 heads of the above intel agencies independently looked at their team's analysis and gave the results to Clapper. So let's get it cleared up.

Doesn't it amaze you that not a single reporter or news agency hasn't had a question similar to this ? We know the answer why.

quote:

Originally posted by olfuzzy:

quote:

Originally posted by WaterburyBob:
This thread will probably hit 2 million views by the first of the year.
Pretty impressive - just like the President-Elect!

I think the 2 millionth post should be reserved for Para.

Uhhh, two million posts probably ain't gonna happen...

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:
What an incredible waste of money.

If it trickled down in the form of overtime pay to the workers who performed the recount, they might have appreciated it at this time of year.

quote:

Originally posted by sigfreund:

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:
What an incredible waste of money.

If it trickled down in the form of overtime pay to the workers who performed the recount, they might have appreciated it at this time of year.

I truly hope it did put some extra money in some good people's pockets this Christmas season. That would be a positive for sure.

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:

quote:

The Wisconsin recount was expected to conclude Monday. With about 95 percent of the votes recounted as of Sunday, Clinton had gained 25 votes on Trump, but still trailed by about 22,000 votes out of nearly 3 million cast in Wisconsin.

What an incredible waste of money.

I don't know how much money Stein had to pay out for the WI, MI & PA recounts, not to mention legal fees involved. So The Hag gained 25 votes in WI & may or may not gain a few in the others, but it certainly won't be enough to turn the election. It'd be interesting to see the cost per vote. I hope all her stupid contributors think it's worth it.

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:
Maybe we've already discussed this, but can a non-US Citizen hold a position such as Press Secretary?

Well ... there is no Constitutional or legal requirement that cabinet officers be citizens ...?

But high likely is it that a non-citizen would be appointed to a Cabinet position? And then there's years of residency ...

The Secretary of State could be a foreigner ... Kissinger wasn't born in the US (Germany) but was naturalized?

As a non-citizen, you cannot be President; in the event of presidential succession, you would be skipped.

Compare to Australia - there's no requirement that any public office-holder be born in Australia, but members of parliament must be citizens, and must not be citizens of another country.

quote:

Originally posted by cjevans:

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:
Maybe we've already discussed this, but can a non-US Citizen hold a position such as Press Secretary?

Well ... there is no Constitutional or legal requirement that cabinet officers be citizens ...?

But high likely is it that a non-citizen would be appointed to a Cabinet position? And then there's years of residency ...

The Secretary of State could be a foreigner ... Kissinger wasn't born in the US (Germany) but was naturalized?

As a non-citizen, you cannot be President; in the event of presidential succession, you would be skipped.

Compare to Australia - there's no requirement that any public office-holder be born in Australia, but members of parliament must be citizens, and must not be citizens of another country.

I only asked because people are throwing Milo's name out there for Press Secretary.

Haha! A feisty gay guy would be the perfect press secretary.

Not to be a yes man, but i agree with para. We need Milo out there hitting colleges and causing a ruckus. Very little is being done on the republican side to draw in young voters.

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:

Uhhh, two million posts probably ain't gonna happen...

1,900,169 right this minute, and nobody seems to be even a little tired (OK maybe one guy) of laughing out loud, not at the losers, but at the belly acing, crying, whining, lying, posturing, threatening, explaining, compromising, excuse making, hyper-ventilating, exagerating, hair-tearing and doubling down of the libs.

If we were a vengeful tribe we would be talking about bayonetting the wounded, but instead we are kicked back watching them drown in their own spit and loving every minute of it.

We're going to 2,000,000. Why look I already added one.

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:

quote:

The Wisconsin recount was expected to conclude Monday. With about 95 percent of the votes recounted as of Sunday, Clinton had gained 25 votes on Trump, but still trailed by about 22,000 votes out of nearly 3 million cast in Wisconsin.

What an incredible waste of money.

A waste of GDC money. I think I'm OK with that.

Chill Jill had to pay for it all, with money she was given by shadow Hillary supporters. If her up-front deposit of $3.5M doesn't cover the cost, she'll be billed for the difference. This didn't cost the taxpayers a dime.

And the results embarrassed the hell out of the left. I'm definitely OK with that!

Good news all around.

quote:

Originally posted by olfuzzy:

quote:

Originally posted by WaterburyBob:
This thread will probably hit 2 million views by the first of the year.
Pretty impressive - just like the President-Elect!

I think the 2 millionth post should be reserved for Para.

At the current rate of posting, this thread should reach its two millionth post sometime around August, 2054.

quote:

Originally posted by parabellum:

At the current rate of posting, this thread should reach its two millionth post sometime around August, 2054.

I thought it was going locked and stickied on jan 20th? Lol

Yes, that will prove to be a major impediment to reaching our goal.

Let's show some can-do spirit.