quote:

Originally posted by mrmn50:
For months I heard people praying that this election would end soon.
So............................?????

I think it's still too close to call.

Have you seen the polls?!!!

quote:

Originally posted by Bytes:

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:
No. He's done. He resigned and the board accepted.

His CEO job is history like Obama will be on Jan. 20th.

Not sure, but I'm thinking Matt Harrigan would like to relive 5-10 minutes of his life. What a dumb ass. This little incident is going to make that next CEO job a little bit harder to get.

He can be the CEO at a prison kitchen.

quote:

Originally posted by sigmonkey:

quote:

Originally posted by mrmn50:
For months I heard people praying that this election would end soon.
So............................?????

I think it's still too close to call.

Have you seen the polls?!!!

Yard signs.

It's all about yard signs.

quote:

Originally posted by Bytes:

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:
No. He's done. He resigned and the board accepted.

His CEO job is history like Obama will be on Jan. 20th.

Not sure, but I'm thinking Matt Harrigan would like to relive 5-10 minutes of his life. What a dumb ass. This little incident is going to make that next CEO job a little bit harder to get.

I started reading the google reviews of Packetsled. There is some comedy gold there, boys...

Hugh Ferris
Hugh Ferris
in the last week
PacketSled threat detection did not detect Matthew Harrigan's threat.

Tully Dog
in the last week
Your CEO is obviously weapons grade stupid and there can be little doubt he surrounded himself with like minded subordinates. Investors, you would be well advised to dump packetsled posthaste. This company is now toxic

You gotta give to the yard signs, they won.

wanted to update an earlier post

using the latest numbers I can find from

https://docs.google.com/spread...view?sle=true#gid=19

Clinton has a popular vote advantage of 1,150,729

but Clinton won California by 3,051,768

taking out California, Trump would have a popular advantage of 1,901,039

Trump made an interesting comment. He won by the current rules and he strategized by the current rules. He didn't waste resources in California.

If the rules were strict popular vote, he would have campaigned in California too.


A Popular vote rule would dramatically change any campaign strategy.

I do not think that we'll be switching to popular vote anytime soon. The middle "fly-over" states would absolutely reject and effectively block it.

quote:

Clinton has a popular vote advantage of 1,150,729

but Clinton won California by 3,051,768

taking out California, Trump would have a popular advantage of 1,901,039

And that isn't counting the illegal votes, which California has facilitated.

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
Matt Harrigan: $5 million salary as CEO PacketSled

He is on administrative leave.

Hope he loses his job

No. He's done. He resigned and the board accepted.

His CEO job is history like Obama will be on Jan. 20th.

Idiot of the year award goes to this tard.

quote:

"The PacketSled Board of Directors accepted the resignation of President and CEO Matthew's Harrigan, effective immediately.

And USSS should prosecute him to the fullest extent of the law. Threatened assassination, terrorism, use of firearm in commission of felony, the works. No plea deal. Just hard time.

[/QUOTE]

No plea deal. Just hard time.[/QUOTE]

... helping to rebuild the nation's highway and bridge infrastructure. The misbegotten salary and holdings can be used to fund a fence.

quote:

per DHS in 2012, there are an estimated 11+ Million illegal immigrants here in the US (basically the same since 2004/5), which is about 3.5% of the US population.

What a crock!!!!

Do they really believe that with illegals storming the border every damned day, 1000s per month, that the total number of illegals has not increased?

Maybe it is that stealth deportation program at work.

It seem almost like these people were infected by
some kind of virus,truly the walking dead. Soulless
and evil. They put the whole country in peril.

more about California

http://www.breitbart.com/calif...llegal-alien-magnet/

the reason 47 percent of state voters are Democrats, while 27 percent are Republicans and 26 percent independents, is that 62 percent of new Latinos voters have registered as Democrats.

The biggest driver for California’s Latino population growth has been Democrat public policies favoring illegal immigration. The National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) reported that “the generous welfare benefits offered by some states have magnetic effects and alter the geographic sorting of immigrants in the United States – attracting many to California.”

The NBER found a direct correlation between the immigration flow and California’s generous welfare benefits, which are 89 percent larger than those in Illinois, and 280 percent greater than those offered by Texas. Fully 45.4 percent of recent U.S. immigrants receiving welfare now live in California.

According to Pew Research, 1 out of every 12 newborns in the United States each year is an “anchor baby,” a U.S.-born child of an illegal alien. But for the 3 million illegal aliens in California, 1 in 5 newborns are “anchor babies.”

President Bill Clinton passed the “Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996,” which denies illegal aliens access to “appropriated funds of the United States” for “federal public benefits,” including health, welfare, food assistance, housing assistance, unemployment, retirement, postsecondary education and hundreds of other programs.

President Trump can turn off California’s illegal immigration magnet on his first day in office simply by enforcing existing federal law.

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
more about California

You sure that is not the Bureau of National Economic Research?

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:

President Trump can turn off California’s illegal immigration magnet on his first day in office simply by enforcing existing federal law.

I'd rather he not. As long as there are illegals coming in, let 'em go to California. Shut it off and they might scatter. Last thing i want is even more of them coming to Utah.

Then again, as more illegals go to California and receive these benefits, the more taxes must go up. As a result, Californians themselves will begin to scatter even more. I said the last thing I want is more illegals in Utah. I lied. The last thing I want are more Californians! (Except SIGforum Californians, of course)

Breaking: Several news groups reporting Trump is asking Ted Cruz to be A.G.

http://www.bloomberg.com/polit...u-s-attorney-general

Cruz would be great choice.

....and Marco Rubio as the Beaver

quote:

Originally posted by medic451:
Breaking: Several news groups reporting Trump is asking Ted Cruz to be A.G.

http://www.bloomberg.com/polit...u-s-attorney-general

LAPD says it won't change its deportation policies under Trump


I wasn't aware of the fact that the LAPD has jurisdiction over immigration policy for the US. Well, after all their federal funding is cut off they won't be able to afford to enforce those laws anyway. When that reality hits, perhaps they will wise up.

Are Cruz's and Session's Senate Seats securely Republican if either decide to work in the administration? Cause to get things done, we of course need to keep our majorities.

Just thinking out loud. Obviously Trump's people know this.

Cruz for AG I was not expecting. Interesting.

I'd rather have Cruz on the court if he's leaving the Senate. I'd rather see Sessions as AG.