yes, he takes on the 'science guy' and has some of his own charts and data to add to the discussion:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_RuverrEZ4

Two days before terror attack, London mayor called global warming ‘one of the biggest risks to humanity’
June 4, 2017 | BPR Wire | Print Article
dc-news-300x71Michael Bastasch, DCNF

Two days before deadly terror attacks hit London, Mayor Sadiq Khan railed against President Donald Trump’s decision to withdraw from the Paris climate accord.

Khan called global warming “one the biggest risks to humanity” and pledged to work with other cities to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement, which is to keep future global warming below 2 degrees Celsius. Trump announced U.S. withdrawal Thursday.


European leaders were also heavily critical of Trump for pulling out of the Paris accord, including U.K. Prime Minister Theresa May.

European leaders pressed Trump on the climate deal at the G7 summit in May, but Trump mainly wanted to talk about fighting terrorism and other issues, not global warming.

Two days later and Khan is faced with two attacks near London Bridge that have been declared terrorist attacks by British authorities.

A white van plowed into about 20 people Saturday on London Bridge shortly after 10 p.m., possibly killing and injuring pedestrians. A group of at least three men armed with knives then attacked people in Borough Market about 80 yards south of the bridge.

British police declared that the two incidents were terror attacks early Sunday morning. Few details have been released regarding any casualties or the attackers.


The London attacks come about two weeks after a suicide bomber killed 22 people and dozens more were injured in Manchester just outside the lobby of an Ariana Grande concert. Young children were among the dead, and the Islamic State took credit for the deadly attack.

Grande is scheduled to hold a benefit concert in Manchester Sunday.

http://www.bizpacreview.com/20...-81b54924bf-32211109

I think they have bigger problems...

quote:

Two days before terror attack, London mayor called global warming ‘one of the biggest risks to humanity’

Well, the London mayor is an idiot, so there's that. He also said London was one of the safest "global cities" and that we shouldn't let the terrorists attacks upset us.

So, let that guide your opinion of liberal politicians. Reality doesn't often trouble them.

RMD

Translation:
The American Gravy Train is over.
And they are pissed.

Great video. Thank you for sharing!

quote:

Originally posted by HuskySig:
Great video. Thank you for sharing!

I'll echo that

quote:

Khan called global warming “one the biggest risks to humanity” and pledged to work with other cities to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement, which is to keep future global warming below 2 degrees Celsius. Trump announced U.S. withdrawal Thursday

Just look at all the people run over, stabbed and blown up by global warming.

It's a travesty.

Mayor Sadiq Khan? Is he a Muslim? Why should I believe anything he says?

flashguy

quote:

Originally posted by flashguy:
Mayor Sadiq Khan? Is he a Muslim? Why should I believe anything he says?

flashguy

Because we all know Muslims are not allowed to lie to infidels. Bon jour!

How is Whittle doing? I haven't seen him in a while and he seems a little, well, diminished here.

quote:

Originally posted by Ripley:
How is Whittle doing? I haven't seen him in a while and he seems a little, well, diminished here.

It's a good question. I wonder too. His message is still right on... but he does look a little, well, "diminished".

last I saw of him about 6 months ago IIRC he was going off to get married....not that there's anything wrong with that....

Great video, thanks for sharing.

Good report. Definitely work sharing with "The Sky is Falling!!" types.

quote:

Originally posted by Chris42:
Good report. Definitely work sharing with "The Sky is Falling!!" types.

They won't watch it.

flashguy

The countries that are mad about Trump pulling out of the climate deal are just mad that the money that obama promised them will NOT be coming. Yep folks the obama gravy train has left the station. You "give me my free stuff folks" have lost your messiah. GET OVER IT!!!!!!!!

The Hockey Stick Collapses: 60 New (2016) Scientific Papers Affirm Today’s Warming Isn’t Global, Unprecedented, Or Remarkable

By Kenneth Richard on 22. December 2016

Two fundamental tenets of the anthropogenic global warming narrative are (1) the globe is warming (i.e., it’s not just regional warming), and (2) the warming that has occurred since 1950 can be characterized as remarkable, unnatural, and largely unprecedented. In other words, today’s climate is substantially and alarmingly different than what has occurred in the past….because the human impact has been profound.

Well, maybe not. Scientists are increasingly finding that the two fundamental points cited above may not be supported by the evidence.

In 2016, an examination of the peer-reviewed scientific literature has uncovered dozens of paleoclimate reconstructions that reveal modern “global” warming has not actually been global in scale after all, as there are a large number of regions on the globe where it has been cooling for decades. Even if it was warming on a global scale, the paleoclimate evidence strongly suggests that the modern warm climate is neither unusual or profoundly different than it has been in the past. In fact, today’s regional warmth isn’t even close to approaching the Earth’s maximum temperatures achieved earlier in the Holocene, or as recently as 1,000 years ago (the Medieval Warm Period), when anthropogenic CO2 emissions could not have exerted a climate impact.

In fact, there is a growing body of evidence that the warming in recent decades is not even unprecedented within the context of the last 80 years. That’s because the amplitude of the 1930s and 1940s warm period matched or exceeded that of the warmth in the late 20th and early 21st centuries in many regions of the world. Furthermore, between the warmth of the 1930s and ’40s and the warmth of the 1990s to present, there was a very widely publicized cooling period (late 1950s to early 1970s) that was heavily discussed in the peer-reviewed scientific literature.

Today’s instrumental datasets curiously do not reflect this 20th century warming-cooling-warming oscillatory shape, however, as doing so would not lend support to the modeled understanding that climate is shaped by anthropogenic CO2 emissions, which have increased linearly, not cyclically. In fact, not only has the high amplitude of the 1930s and 1940s warmth been “adjusted” down or depressed in global-scale representations of instrumental temperatures by NASA or the MetOffice, the substantial cooling (-0.5°C in the Northern Hemisphere, including -1.5°C cooling in the Arctic region) that occurred in the 1960s and 1970s has all but disappeared from today’s temperature graphs.

Scientists, meanwhile, keep on publishing their results. And their results don’t lend support to the narrative that the globe has been synchronously warming, or warming in linear fashion and in concert with the rise in anthropogenic CO2 emissions. Indeed, in many regions of the world, decadal-scale cooling has occurred since the mid-20th century.

Listed below are a collection of 60 peer-reviewed scientific papers published within the last year (2016) undermining the “consensus” position that modern warming patterns are global in extent and synchronization, and that today’s warmth is both unusual and unprecedented. The first section (1) identifies the regions of the world where there has been no net warming in recent decades. The second section (2) puts modern climate into its much larger Holocene context, revealing just how insignificant and unremarkable this current (regional) warming trend has been relative to history.

(1) ‘Global’ Warming? No Net Warming In These Regions Since Mid Or Late 20th Century

De Jong et al., 2016 (Andes, South America)

[T]he reconstruction…shows that recent warming (until AD 2009) is not exceptional in the context of the past century. For example, the periods around AD 1940 and from AD 1950–1955 were warmer. This is also shown in the reanalysis data for this region and was also observed by Neukom et al. (2010b) and Neukom and Gergis (2011) for Patagonia and central Chile. Similarly, based on tree ring analyses from the upper tree limit in northern Patagonia, Villalba et al. (2003) found that the period just before AD 1950 was substantially warmer than more recent decades.


- See more at: http://notrickszone.com/2016/1...sthash.xhcgbBnA.dpuf