SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    CA members...Register or go featureless ?
Page 1 2 3 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
CA members...Register or go featureless ? Login/Join 
Ammoholic
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by PR64:

#2 Removable magazine



The removable magazine is only an issue if any of the other evil features are there. M1 Garand, Keltec SU-16 are not assault weapons.

If you don't want to register and you want to keep the rifle in CA, you can either get rid of the features (and then you can get rid of the bullet button and replace it with a normal mag release button) or you can replace the bullet button with a mag release that requires splitting the action.
 
Posts: 7183 | Location: Lost, but making time. | Registered: February 23, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Conservative in Nor Cal constantly swimming
up stream
Picture of PR64
posted Hide Post
Once registered as a RAW you can't sell it or transfer it in CA. You can't pass it down to your children if they live in the state. Also more draconian transport laws apply.


-----------------------------------
Get your guns b4 the Dems take them away
Sig P-229
Sig P-220 Combat
 
Posts: 3682 | Location: Nor Cal | Registered: January 25, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
goodheart
Picture of sjtill
posted Hide Post
I have both a "Bullet Button Extended" rig and a Monsterman kydex wrap for the pistol grip.
I've been advised not to register it as an assault weapon but to keep it featureless.
Right now they're still in pieces in the safe.


_________________________
“Remember, remember the fifth of November!"
 
Posts: 18560 | Location: One hop from Paradise | Registered: July 27, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
King Nothing
Picture of SigSauerP226
posted Hide Post
I'm going featureless, I only own one AR. I, too, am looking at the Thordsen FRS-15. I am looking forward to having a normal mag release, and am fine without all the evil features as long as the FRS feels good.

Anyone actually use the FRS? How do you like it? I've watched reviews, but yet to handle one. Planning on getting to the LGS to see how it feels.

Hopefully one day I'll get out of Ca, but pretty well stuck for now.




...Then it comes to be that the soothing light at the end of your tunnel, was just a freight train coming your way...
 
Posts: 2591 | Location: Simi Valley, CA | Registered: September 25, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Most of mine (including my MPX carbine) I have converted to featureless. One AR I made "fixed mag".
I also built one of my 80% lowers into a "straight pull" bolt action AR.
 
Posts: 57 | Registered: November 26, 2014Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Yokel
Picture of ontmark
posted Hide Post
I am going three ways.

My MCX was purchased when California required registration rifles by make and model to owner when purchased. So it is already on paper and I will register it as AW. I am going to put the collapsible stock on it and get the two inch extended rods so when it is fully collapsed it will be over 30 inches from end of barrel to end of stock. Cannot include muzzle devise unless it is pinned and welded. So this will be the shortest rifle allowed in California.

My SIG516 is not currently registered as a rifle by Make and Model but I plan to register it as AW also.

My stripped lower is almost complete with the Thordsen Stock and Buffer Cover. It has a standard Mag release. It will stay that way. I plan to replace the flash hider with a muzzle brake on my SIG516 that way I can move the complete upper to the featureless lower and be able to take it anywhere I go.

Last but not least my finished 80 percent lower will find a new home somewhere.

That should take care of it.



Beware the man who only has one gun. He probably knows how to use it! - John Steinbeck
 
Posts: 3878 | Location: Vallejo, CA | Registered: August 18, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Yokel
Picture of ontmark
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by MikeinNC:
What is this "featureless" you speak of??


Here are the three main examples of featureless.
Your nuzzle end devise cannot be a flash suppressor. Muzzle Brake OK.








Beware the man who only has one gun. He probably knows how to use it! - John Steinbeck
 
Posts: 3878 | Location: Vallejo, CA | Registered: August 18, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Team Apathy
posted Hide Post
The AR's I purchased prior to long gun registration will be featureless. In fact, my primary carbine has been featureless for years. It sports the very functional Thorsden stock. Like someone lsd mentioned, the big downside to the Thorsden is the difficulty reaching the safety.

The rifles I purchased after long gun registration took effect will registered.

I sold my Sub2000 a few weeks ago. It's intended purpose was a truck gun and I didn't see it filling that role adequately under new regulations.
 
Posts: 6483 | Location: Modesto, CA | Registered: January 27, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Ammoholic
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by SigSauerP226:
I'm going featureless, I only own one AR. I, too, am looking at the Thordsen FRS-15. I am looking forward to having a normal mag release, and am fine without all the evil features as long as the FRS feels good.

Anyone actually use the FRS? How do you like it? I've watched reviews, but yet to handle one. Planning on getting to the LGS to see how it feels.

Hopefully one day I'll get out of Ca, but pretty well stuck for now.

Yes, I am using an FRS-15. It is fine with an ambi safety. I flip the safety off normally with my thumb, but can't reach far enough to put it back on so I use the trigger finger on the ambi safety to engage it. It seems a little heavy (not much, but heavier than the pistol grip and stock it replaced), but it is back at the shoulder so no biggy. I LOVE have a standard magazine release. I'm quite happy with it given my current location and CA's current laws.

As soon as CA's AWB is overturned (not holding my breath, but we can hope) or I escape this communist paradise the rifles will return to their original configuration (unless they get short barrels and/or cans Smile) and all these 10 round magazines will go in a box, but for the current situation I am happy with this solution.
 
Posts: 7183 | Location: Lost, but making time. | Registered: February 23, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I bought a Colt last year for the purpose of registering since it was registered when I DROS'd it. Other stuff bought before long guns were registered will be out of state at my Bro's place in free America. It's pretty damn sad that we're 5 months into the year and the state method of registering assault weapons still doesn't work. I do suspect that non compliance will be rampant.
 
Posts: 5067 | Location: Florida Panhandle  | Registered: November 23, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Just an ACARS message
with feelings
Picture of qxsoup
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ElToro:
I bought a Colt last year for the purpose of registering since it was registered when I DROS'd it. Other stuff bought before long guns were registered will be out of state at my Bro's place in free America. It's pretty damn sad that we're 5 months into the year and the state method of registering assault weapons still doesn't work. I do suspect that non compliance will be rampant.


just like in 2000.


____________________________

220/229/228/226/P6/225/XO/SP2022/239



 
Posts: 3066 | Location: The Queen City (the one in Ohio) | Registered: May 12, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
New York residents went through ( continue to go through) a similar dilemma.before I moved I went featureless, and it seems the only sensible way. The idea of retaining looks ( aka evil features) over performance (ability to reload from detachable magazines clear malfunctions service the rifle ) is ludicrous on the face of it.
A rifle you have to shoot ten break open single load ten rounds in a fixed mag close shoot and repeat just is not practical even on the range imo.
 
Posts: 3420 | Location: Finally free in AZ! | Registered: February 14, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
King Nothing
Picture of SigSauerP226
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ontmark
...

What stock is that? I haven't seen that before, but I like it...classic rifle style, looks good. Do you like it better than the Thordsen?
quote:
Originally posted by slosig:
quote:
Originally posted by SigSauerP226:
...

Yes, I am using an FRS-15. It is fine with an ambi safety. I flip the safety off normally with my thumb, but can't reach far enough to put it back on so I use the trigger finger on the ambi safety to engage it. It seems a little heavy (not much, but heavier than the pistol grip and stock it replaced), but it is back at the shoulder so no biggy. I LOVE have a standard magazine release. I'm quite happy with it given my current location and CA's current laws.

As soon as CA's AWB is overturned (not holding my breath, but we can hope) or I escape this communist paradise the rifles will return to their original configuration (unless they get short barrels and/or cans Smile) and all these 10 round magazines will go in a box, but for the current situation I am happy with this solution.

Sounds like the Thordsen should be pretty good, then, but guess I might need to add the ambi safety because I don't have one. I am definitely looking forward to the standard mag release myself. For me, that's the big plus of going featureless. I try to keep my stuff more on the simple side anyway, so I'll be content.




...Then it comes to be that the soothing light at the end of your tunnel, was just a freight train coming your way...
 
Posts: 2591 | Location: Simi Valley, CA | Registered: September 25, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Get on the fifty!
Picture of Andyb
posted Hide Post
I hope one day you folks can live in America.



"Pickin' stones and pullin' teats is a hard way to make a living. But, sure as God's got sandals, it beats fightin' dudes with treasure trails."

"We've been tricked, we've been backstabbed, and we've been quite possibly, bamboozled."
 
Posts: 3631 | Location: OK | Registered: November 07, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of ergoproxy
posted Hide Post
The madness just won't stop. Those requirements,just wow.
 
Posts: 1158 | Location: USA | Registered: December 28, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Ammoholic
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Andyb:
I hope one day you folks can live in America.

Me too! It would be fantastic if CA would become part of America, but leaving CA to get to America seems a lot more likely.
 
Posts: 7183 | Location: Lost, but making time. | Registered: February 23, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Yokel
Picture of ontmark
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by SigSauerP226:
quote:
Originally posted by ontmark
...

What stock is that? I haven't seen that before, but I like it...classic rifle style, looks good. Do you like it better than the Thordsen?
quote:
Originally posted by slosig:
quote:
Originally posted by SigSauerP226:
...

Yes, I am using an FRS-15. It is fine with an ambi safety. I flip the safety off normally with my thumb, but can't reach far enough to put it back on so I use the trigger finger on the ambi safety to engage it. It seems a little heavy (not much, but heavier than the pistol grip and stock it replaced), but it is back at the shoulder so no biggy. I LOVE have a standard magazine release. I'm quite happy with it given my current location and CA's current laws.

As soon as CA's AWB is overturned (not holding my breath, but we can hope) or I escape this communist paradise the rifles will return to their original configuration (unless they get short barrels and/or cans Smile) and all these 10 round magazines will go in a box, but for the current situation I am happy with this solution.

Sounds like the Thordsen should be pretty good, then, but guess I might need to add the ambi safety because I don't have one. I am definitely looking forward to the standard mag release myself. For me, that's the big plus of going featureless. I try to keep my stuff more on the simple side anyway, so I'll be content.


Stock Shotgun Stock with an adapter to mount by exile machine.

http://www.exilemachine.net/sh...pter-blk-105600.html

This message has been edited. Last edited by: ontmark,



Beware the man who only has one gun. He probably knows how to use it! - John Steinbeck
 
Posts: 3878 | Location: Vallejo, CA | Registered: August 18, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Yokel
Picture of ontmark
posted Hide Post
These are California legal with a detachable magazine.

Kind of like a SIG MCX upper with the recoil springs in the upper. I have not seen one in person yet but they do look nice.

https://fightlite.com/collections/scr-rifles



Beware the man who only has one gun. He probably knows how to use it! - John Steinbeck
 
Posts: 3878 | Location: Vallejo, CA | Registered: August 18, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of SIGINT-228
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ontmark:
quote:
Originally posted by MikeinNC:
What is this "featureless" you speak of??


Here are the three main examples of featureless.
Your nuzzle end devise cannot be a flash suppressor. Muzzle Brake OK.






Oh, the mutilation of such beautiful, elegant, iconic piece of engineering? Eugene Stoner must be rolling in his grave.


------------------------------------------------------------
“Come on you sons of bitches, do you want to live forever?” Sergeant Major Dan Daly (USMC)
 
Posts: 1097 | Registered: August 05, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Definitely would not register. I'd leave my rifle featureless.
 
Posts: 838 | Location: CA | Registered: January 23, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    CA members...Register or go featureless ?

© SIGforum 2024