https://www.zerohedge.com/mark...nce-sales-california

Faltering California took another economic hit on Friday, as America's largest personal lines insurer said it would immediately stop selling new home insurance policies in the state. California is the largest property and casualty insurance market in the country.

State Farm attributed the decision to three factors: "historic increases in construction costs outpacing inflation, rapidly growing catastrophe exposure, and a challenging reinsurance market." Reinsurance is a method of transferring some of an insurer's risk to other insurers.

Existing policies will stay in effect -- for now. There's always the possibility that, if things keep deteriorating, State Farm could decide to "non-renew" current policy-holders. That's what AIG did last year, sending thousands of high-end homeowners scrambling to find new coverage.

The announcement's timing -- on a Friday afternoon heading into a long holiday weekend -- seemed intended to minimize publicity. In statement, State Farm said it "will cease accepting new applications including all business and personal lines property and casualty insurance, effective May 27, 2023. This decision does not impact personal auto insurance." The halt seems to include renters insurance, though the announcement wasn't explicit on that count.

Inflation has been taking a harsh toll on insurers, who are pressing regulators to approve rate hikes to compensate for rising claim costs. Earlier this month, for example, San Antonio-based USAA posted the first ever annual loss in its 100-year history -- a $1.3 billion setback.

In California, insurers have also been contending with high wildfire risks, and many have curtailed coverage in wildfire-prone regions, or clamped down on homes that lack certain fire-thwarting characteristics, which range from building materials to clearing space between the structure and surrounding trees.

State Farm diplomatically acknowledged the California government's efforts to make the state a viable place for property insurers to operate in, but implied their efforts to date have been insufficient:

"We take seriously our responsibility to manage risk. We recognize the Governor’s administration, legislators, and the California Department of Insurance (CDI) for their wildfire loss mitigation efforts. We pledge to work constructively with the CDI and policymakers to help build market capacity in California. However, it’s necessary to take these actions now to improve the company’s financial strength."

The property insurance situation in the Golden State is spiraling into crisis, and horror stories abound. For example, consider a San Diego County homeowners association (HOA) comprising 187 townhouses. The HOA had been been paying $54,000 for property insurance. After the policy was non-renewed, the HOA ended up with a new carrier charging a $293,000 premium -- prompting an emergency assessment from each owner.

California already has a notoriously high cost of living, ranking second only to Hawaii in the percentage of homeowners (29.7%) who spend more than 30% of their gross income on housing costs. The departure of the country's largest home insurance provider won't do anything to help the insurance component of those costs.

There could be follow-on insurance-market effects from State Farm's departure, as homeowners who would have been insured by State Farm are now forced to seek quotes from companies who are themselves increasingly reluctant to expand their exposure in the state. In a vicious circle effect, some could wind up following State Farm's example.

It all promises to put more pressure on California's FAIR plan, a state-run scheme to provide coverage to those who can't obtain protection from private insurers.

Typical. Been through that here. Everyone else then raises their rates. Good luck.

Actions have consequences.

quote:

State Farm attributed the decision to three factors: "historic increases in construction costs outpacing inflation, rapidly growing catastrophe exposure, and a challenging reinsurance market." Reinsurance is a method of transferring some of an insurer's risk to other insurers.

2/3 of those factors are in effect everywhere.
The insurance costs have skyrocketed.

My parents currently live in one of the major fire hazard zones, each year the insurance rider for forest fires would change companies. Every year there are community meetings with state insurance officials and various insurance brokers attempting to explain the changes, the rate increases and coverage limitations. It's gotten so bad & frustrating, that many full-timers living in these ares, are simply moving out of the area - either out of state, buying a small place in suburbia or, throwing-in the towel and figuring out living arrangements with their children.

It's a round-about way to move the population (largely retirees and low-income) out of the fire hazard zones and into more settled suburbia or, back into urban areas. Given how bad the urban metro areas have been the last five-years, its not a surprise how many home developments have exploded around once agricultural heavy areas.

quote:

It's gotten so bad & frustrating, that many full-timers living in these ares, are simply moving out of the area -

If they can't get or afford Home Insurance they have to either self-insure (accept the risk) or sell and get out. Of course selling in that situation won't net high values.
But if the cost comes down enough... someone will take the risk. It may entail private efforts at mitigation and volunteer fire brigades.

What is next California. Pass a law that insurance companies must provide affordable homeowner and renter insurance?

How about passing laws against wild fires, mud slides, and other natural disasters.

In the 1990s in the San Francisco bay, there was a news flash about how one house survived a forest fire that wiped out every other home. They interviewed the owner, who said simply "Building home in area with fires, use non-flammable material"

quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:

quote:

It's gotten so bad & frustrating, that many full-timers living in these ares, are simply moving out of the area -

If they can't get or afford Home Insurance they have to either self-insure (accept the risk) or sell and get out. Of course selling in that situation won't net high values.
But if the cost comes down enough... someone will take the risk. It may entail private efforts at mitigation and volunteer fire brigades.

The difference between California and sane states is they actively block or add years of bureaucratic red tape to projects to mitigate fire risk.

A homeowner can trim brush and cut fire brakes, but embers carry a long way and not many own enough land. For example, if California prevents the power company from brush clearing power lines and it starts a fire you may lose your home even though you did everything you could.

Our HOA insurance here in San Diego went from 95k to 230k,
We found an out of state that would insure us.
Unfortunate the HOA dues went up dramatically to pay for this crap.