Unbelievable.

https://tennesseestar.com/2021...toral-college-votes/

quote:

Vice President Mike Pence Welcomes the Efforts of Representatives and Senators to Object to Electoral College Votes

Stand up and fight yourself, Mike. This is exactly the same as Kemp saying he supports a recount, while not acting himself.

if you can't show us the ballots for a real verified audit then ALL of the results for those precincts should be eliminated

these people need to pay - some more heavily than others

I don't want to hear Pence say that he's concerned about fraud, I want him to say he's mad as hell that the election was stolen and he's going to fight to the death for the American people. And I'm so glad that he welcomes their efforts, that's so nice of him. I can't stand the polite, reserved, inoffensive statements Republicans give.

quote:

I can't stand the polite, reserved, inoffensive statements Republicans give.

Yep. We need fighters.

quote:

Originally posted by sigspecops:
I don't want to hear Pence say that he's concerned about fraud, I want him to say he's mad as hell that the election was stolen and he's going to fight to the death for the American people. And I'm so glad that he welcomes their efforts, that's so nice of him. I can't stand the polite, reserved, inoffensive statements Republicans give.

Pence is weak. Like I said several pages back, he could barely tow the President’s agenda on the news networks. His relationship with Trump is similar to that of Ed McMahon and Johnny Carson, a decent emcee and so-so color commentator that could never fill the big man’s shoes. Typical politician in other words.

6-Person Team Briefed Hundreds of State Senators on Election Irregularities

https://www.theepochtimes.com/...reaking-2021-01-03-1

A six-person team that included Rudy Giuliani and Peter Navarro on Saturday briefed hundreds of state lawmakers on evidence of election irregularities.

The Zoom meeting included hundreds of legislators across Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, Navarro, the White House director of trade and manufacturing policy, said during an appearance on Fox News.

“These legislators, they’re hot, they’re angry, they want action,” Navarro said. “We gave them the receipts. We explained exactly how the Democrat Party, as a matter of strategy, stole this election from Donald J. Trump.”

According to Got Freedom?, a nonprofit election integrity watchdog, the meeting included an address by President Donald Trump. Nearly 300 legislators heard from the president, Navarro, and Trump’s lawyer, Giuliani.

John Eastman and John Lott were also part of the briefing. Eastman represented Texas in the now-dismissed interstate challenge to the outcome of the election. Lott, a senior adviser for research and statistics for the Department of Justice, authored a recently released report on election theft.

Legislators were briefed on evidence of alleged voter, ballot, and election fraud, which can be viewed on a webpage hosted by Got Freedom?

“This information should serve as an important resource for state legislators as they make calls for state legislatures to meet to investigate the election and consider decertifying their state election results,” Phill Kline, who heads the Thomas More Foundation’s Amistad Project and who hosted the call on behalf of of the group, said in a statement.

“The integrity of our elections is far too important to treat cavalierly, and elected officials deserve to have all relevant information at their disposal as they consider whether to accept the reported results of the 2020 elections, especially in states where the process was influenced by private interests,” he added.

Navarro released a report on Dec. 21 that summarized and categorized evidence of election theft. In the Jan. 2 interview, he said he will be releasing another report on Monday. Navarro said Saturday the report “shows beyond a shadow of a doubt this election was stolen.”

Trump’s legal team and a handful of third parties are litigating challenges to the election in court in six battleground states. Dozens of U.S. Senators and House members have committed to lodging objections to electoral slates from those states when Congress counts the Electoral College votes on Jan. 6.

Democrats have criticized the efforts and say the election ran smoothly, apart from a small number of voter fraud cases.

Navarro also suggested that a special counsel may be appointed to investigate if fraud had occurred.

“I would not be surprised to see a special counsel on this,” Navarro said.

Trump’s legal team testified before several panels and committees from state legislatures, including in Michigan, Arizona, and Georgia. The team argued that the mounting evidence of election theft and malfeasance necessitated that the legislatures assert their constitutional right to appoint presidential electors. None of the legislatures have so far followed the team’s advice.

Trump has called on his supporters to descend on Washington when Congress counts the electoral votes on Jan. 6. Some of the senators who committed to objecting to the Electoral College votes that day said they will do so unless Congress appoints a special commission to conduct a 10-day emergency audit of the election. Individual state legislatures would then vet the findings and have the opportunity to convene and vote on a new set of electors.

quote:

Originally posted by 12131:

quote:

Originally posted by Boss1:
Good chance we'd all really, REALLY love to hear someone try to provide a plausible an explanation for this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IucBsKRyoSQ

It's just normal activity of scanning the same ballots over and over again. No fraud. Nothing to see. Move along please.

The linked video shows the same ballots being scanned multiple times.

Thinking back, I believe that I recall a bar code on my ballot, with a serial number.

Assuming that each ballot has its own serial number, I would be very surprised if the tallying software did not reject multiple scans of the same serial number.

It could be that the President and Vice President are trying to avoid inevitable public, liberal media and democrat accusations of conflict of interest by having Pence object since his future is on the line, too.

It could be that they want to see how many senate and house republicans (a couple of democrats maybe?) actually support this administration by objecting.

Unlike the democrats put the country first, the party can wait in line.

quote:

Originally posted by wcb6092:
6-Person Team Briefed Hundreds of State Senators on Election Irregularities

https://www.theepochtimes.com/...reaking-2021-01-03-1

A six-person team that included Rudy Giuliani and Peter Navarro on Saturday briefed hundreds of state lawmakers on evidence of election irregularities.

The Zoom meeting included hundreds of legislators across Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, Navarro, the White House director of trade and manufacturing policy, said during an appearance on Fox News.

“These legislators, they’re hot, they’re angry, they want action,” Navarro said. “We gave them the receipts. We explained exactly how the Democrat Party, as a matter of strategy, stole this election from Donald J. Trump.”

And then today Toomey came out today and said there is no evidence of any fraud and overwhelming evidence that Biden won. Murkowski didn't miss an opportunity to jump on that train as well, so the vote is over in the Senate, but we knew that. It all comes down to Pence.

PS the Karmanator is down for Youtube videos

quote:

Originally posted by V-Tail:

quote:

Originally posted by 12131:

quote:

Originally posted by Boss1:
Good chance we'd all really, REALLY love to hear someone try to provide a plausible an explanation for this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IucBsKRyoSQ

It's just normal activity of scanning the same ballots over and over again. No fraud. Nothing to see. Move along please.

The linked video shows the same ballots being scanned multiple times.

Thinking back, I believe that I recall a bar code on my ballot, with a serial number.

Assuming that each ballot has its own serial number, I would be very surprised if the tallying software did not reject multiple scans of the same serial number.

Yeah, and the voting machines weren't supposed to be contactable from the outside like they did the other day...anything electronic can be hacked/over-ridden/reprogrammed.

At this point, with all the evidence we've seen...anything along the lines of 'no evidence of fraud/Ol' Sleepy overwhelming won' is a flat out lie...

$.02 worth,
Boss

Its no coincidence that every rino that says no fraud is someone who has always hated Trump. This isn't fraud, oh no, it's the miracle that they've been dreaming about for the last four years.

has anyone been able to explain how when counting votes, its an incremental process so how does a vote count decrement?

I wouldn't expect a politician to grasp the significance of this because its an indicator of fraud - but thats anti-agenda

^^^^^^^
Exactly, at least the Democrats/Socialist should be required to explain the low hanging fruit.

Please explain the fractional votes.

quote:

Originally posted by V-Tail:.

Thinking back, I believe that I recall a bar code on my ballot, with a serial number.

Assuming that each ballot has its own serial number, I would be very surprised if the tallying software did not reject multiple scans of the same serial number.

During the last Georgia Legislative Hearing Jovan Pulitzer showed the difference between the printing of ballots in conservative districts vs. liberal districts.

Not all ballots are created equal it seems.

quote:

Originally posted by kimber1911:

quote:

Originally posted by V-Tail:.

Thinking back, I believe that I recall a bar code on my ballot, with a serial number.

Assuming that each ballot has its own serial number, I would be very surprised if the tallying software did not reject multiple scans of the same serial number.

During the last Georgia Legislative Hearing Jovan Pulitzer showed the difference between the printing of ballots in conservative districts vs. liberal districts.

Not all ballots are created equal it seems.

Not a problem for an internet connected machine. Just download a little 'update' to handle that.

”[/QUOTE]

And then today Toomey came out today and said there is no evidence of any fraud and overwhelming evidence that Biden won. Murkowski didn't miss an opportunity to jump on that train as well, so the vote is over in the Senate, but we knew that. It all comes down to Pence.
[/QUOTE]

We are doing awesome here in PA! First that stuttering corrupt joetard got shit out onto the planet in scranton. We have to claim him even though I’d happily dump that dishonor on DE if I could. If he becomes president he will share ranks with James Buchanan. Couple of real winners there. We would literally have both our presidents in the bottom 5 US presidents ever.

Then Toomey. Weak ass rino that is retiring. Always trying to suck up to SE PA leftys that never voted for the motherfucker in the first place. Probably get replaced by another shitstain D since PA Republican party is about as inept as it gets in getting Republicans in office for federal positions.

Welcome to PA, 56 red counties every election and goddamn near nothing to show for it but national embarrassment.

quote:

Originally posted by sigspecops:
Its no coincidence that every rino that says no fraud is someone who has always hated Trump. This isn't fraud, oh no, it's the miracle that they've been dreaming about for the last four years.

He has exposed people like Romney for who they are, and nothing sets them off more than having their self-righteous masks torn off.

There is more to it than that, though. The powerful forces we are fighting don't take risks. That's why you see them giving money to both sides, and it doesn't matter who wins because they control both. Any of these forces, foreign or domestic, can't control President Trump. It's easy to see who has sold their souls because they are the ones fighting him the hardest.

quote:

Originally posted by V-Tail:

quote:

Originally posted by 12131:

quote:

Originally posted by Boss1:
Good chance we'd all really, REALLY love to hear someone try to provide a plausible an explanation for this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IucBsKRyoSQ

It's just normal activity of scanning the same ballots over and over again. No fraud. Nothing to see. Move along please.

The linked video shows the same ballots being scanned multiple times.

Thinking back, I believe that I recall a bar code on my ballot, with a serial number.

Assuming that each ballot has its own serial number, I would be very surprised if the tallying software did not reject multiple scans of the same serial number.

A properly programmed software would do that, of course. But was THIS software set up to do it?

flashguy

Kurt Schlichter had the right idea back in Sept. 2020, even more applicable now...

"No Democrats, not ever. No soft Republicans, not ever. Only harsh conservatives who loudly live the dogma. Elect conservawoke candidates who understand the threat, and who savor the opportunity to use their political power to harm the left in every way they can."

https://townhall.com/columnist...ves-to-riot-n2577020

quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:

quote:

I can't stand the polite, reserved, inoffensive statements Republicans give.

Yep. We need fighters.