quote:

Redacted

That word needs to be banned.
It is why we are in the mess we are now.
Government secrecy to protect it’s own, not to protect us.

Believe statistics or believe your eyes, either way Joe did not win.



‘Simple Math’ Shows Biden Claims 13 MILLION More Votes Than There Were Eligible Voters Who Voted in 2020 Election

This message has been edited. Last edited by: kimber1911,

^^^^ But but some of the experts one here tell us that the Biden voters just dutifully stayed home because the very deadly virus that has killed hundreds of thousands of people. They were simply motivated to vote on election day. Oh, and also the millions of the 2016 Trump voters that subsequently switched to Biden because they can't stand Trump's style. That's why Trump lost, don't you know. There was no fraud widespread enough to to alter the outcome of the election. There was no systemic fraud coordination from the Dems. No sir, none. Biden won. Trump lost. Move on, already.

strange world we live in

Pretty bitchin'...

The president calls for a massive rally in DC on January 6, "Be there, will be wild." https://www.thegatewaypundit.c...an-6-says-will-wild/

If he goes, he will not go meekly. This, I think, is step one of endless resistance to the commie regime.

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:
Pretty bitchin'...

Love it, reminds me of a shield with cross, updated a few years.
Go Crusaders, I mean Guardians (-;

quote:

If he goes, he will not go meekly. This, I think, is step one of endless resistance to the commie regime.

Yep. We won't have a President. An un-elected fraudulent occupant of the White House will not have any mandate or real authority.

The question is not so much “must Americans respect a fraud?” but instead is, “how can Americans respect a fraud?” And specifically, how can those of the Judeo-Christian heritage heed such a person? To respect falsely assumed authority is to disrespect the authority God, if our understanding of scripture is correct. And if the President of the United States cannot have favor in the eyes of the people he claims to be serving, how can America’s rivals on the world stage esteem him?

It is almost as if there is not going to be a president at all. “Sede vacante,” American style: the Oval Office chair is empty. There is but a pretender to the throne.

Read more: https://www.americanthinker.co...t.html#ixzz6h5K59Nha

This Judeo does not and will not accept the Fraud-n-Broad, no matter what.

And I still will not accept that it is over until Donald J. Trump speaks that he is quitting, because he did not lose.

quote:

Originally posted by sigmonkey:
Fraud-n-Broad

quote:

Originally posted by sigmonkey:
This Judeo does not and will not accept the Fraud-n-Broad, no matter what.

And I still will not accept that it is over until Donald J. Trump speaks that he is quitting, because he did not lose.

Nope. Their gaslighting won't work on me.

IF it happens, I propose that 74,000,000 voters congregate at the fake inauguration and literally turn their backs to obiden.

I know, but it's the thought that counts.

US Army Rejects Using 'Martial Law' on Election Fraud

Retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn's Newsmax TV remarks on President Donald Trump weighing "martial law" and "military capabilities" amid election fraud has forced U.S. Army leaders to issue a statement Friday rejecting that consideration.

"There is no role for the U.S. military in determining the outcome of an American election," Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy and Army chief of staff Gen. James McConville wrote in a joint statement Friday.

The statement echoed one by Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley before the election.

Gen. Flynn told Thursday's "Greg Kelly Reports":

"He could immediately on his order seize every single one of these machines around the country on his order. He could also order, within the swing states, if he wanted to, he could take military capabilities and he could place them in those states and basically rerun an election in each of those states. It's not unprecedented.

"I mean, these people are out there talking about martial law like it's something that we've never done. Martial law has been instituted 64 times."

Flynn's martial law remarks were on the heals of Georgia lawyer L. Lin Wood's previous comments to Newsmax TV's "The Count" last week:

"If the Supreme Court does not act, I think the president should declare some extent of Martial law, and he should hold off an stay the electoral college.

"Because we cannot have in this country, an election of our leader, where you have massive evidence of fraud and illegality. This country has to have a vote that has integrity. And the electoral college does not need to meet and vote until we have resolved these issues."

LINK

quote:

Originally posted by Ripley:

But now it looks like the inauguration will be virtual. A big Trump rally in a temperate place, a huge screen all can see with the inauguration up.

Of course, otherwise the streets would be packed with Ol’ Sleepy’s 420 supporters.

Let’s see what the next few days bring...people defying subpoenas is not a good thing in the quest for the truth.

$.02 worth,
Boss

Cool, more people to replace.

quote:

Originally posted by EZ_B:
US Army Rejects Using 'Martial Law' on Election Fraud

Retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn's Newsmax TV remarks on President Donald Trump weighing "martial law" and "military capabilities" amid election fraud has forced U.S. Army leaders to issue a statement Friday rejecting that consideration.

"There is no role for the U.S. military in determining the outcome of an American election," Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy and Army chief of staff Gen. James McConville wrote in a joint statement Friday.

The statement echoed one by Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley before the election.

Gen. Flynn told Thursday's "Greg Kelly Reports":

"He could immediately on his order seize every single one of these machines around the country on his order. He could also order, within the swing states, if he wanted to, he could take military capabilities and he could place them in those states and basically rerun an election in each of those states. It's not unprecedented.

"I mean, these people are out there talking about martial law like it's something that we've never done. Martial law has been instituted 64 times."

Flynn's martial law remarks were on the heals of Georgia lawyer L. Lin Wood's previous comments to Newsmax TV's "The Count" last week:

"If the Supreme Court does not act, I think the president should declare some extent of Martial law, and he should hold off an stay the electoral college.

"Because we cannot have in this country, an election of our leader, where you have massive evidence of fraud and illegality. This country has to have a vote that has integrity. And the electoral college does not need to meet and vote until we have resolved these issues."

LINK

And the big green weenie strikes again

quote:

Originally posted by Boss1:
..Ol’ Sleepy’s 420 supporters...

Is that a number or a state of mind? Probably both.

If the Supreme court does not act on this travesty, I would go with martial law to pickup all the voting machines in the 5 contested states. Then re-run the election as it is going to be run in Georgia, with 1000 pole watchers.

No problem with this at all.

The right of the people to petition is the foundation that The Declaration of Independence was built.

And justified in the form of the American Revolution, when the people, wearied by King George's continued and repeatedly ignored petitions for redress of grievances.

It is not simply a bumper sticker slogan.

The people have had their right of petition and their grievances (of this election issues) to be heard, being ignored and summarily "dismissed" with the wave from the back of the hand, by those who pretend to address them.

They insult, continually, the people who have honestly, faithfully and dually, given consent to be governed, with honor and integrity, while getting neither honesty nor integrity in return for their consent.

What that have received has been contemptible and counterfeit.

We have and are, being robbed.


When one grants another person(s) power of attorney over one's affairs, or delegates authority to another person to act on one's behalf, and that person(s) fail to execute that power or authority properly or to the desires of the one's granting, then it can and should be revoked, and no further justification for such revocation is, nor should be, demanded.