quote:

Originally posted by GWbiker:

quote:

Originally posted by divil:
Very true sadly. Too many here cannot comprehend how good we have it and none of those mouthbreathers have ever chafed under the yoke of totalitarianism but they are hell bent to lead us all there just the same.

Those idiots have no idea what a totalitarian system is like.

They should talk with the Cubans in Miami who fled Castro or the Germans, Czech, Hungarians and Poles who fled the Soviet system.

These histories are available for anyone to study them...but they're so diluted, their brain wouldn't allow them comprehend the parallels. These are the same fools that have ruined places like the big cities on the west coast, which they then flee, go to a new area, and begin anew with their same destructive ways, oblivious to the fact that THEY are the cause to what they're fleeing from.

The embodiment of 'Be careful what you wish for...'

Unfortunately, their actions don't exist in a vacuum...and effect us as well.

$.02 worth,
Boss

I keep hearing conflicting stories about the SC taking the TX lawsuit. Supposedly its on their docket but I've heard that they actually haven't agreed to take it. Anyone know anything for certain?

^^It seems like a lotta eggs in one BIG basket...hoping roughly 1/3 of the states involved gets the appropriate attention...this can't be dismissed as one or two 'rogue' AG's or something...

$.02 worth,
Boss

President Trump is still working to improve the world we live in.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news...-in-us-brokered-deal

Israel, Morocco agree to normalise relations in US-brokered deal
Under the agreement, Morocco will establish full diplomatic relations and resume official contacts with Israel.

People love the idea of the free crap they're being promised by the democrat socialists. They don't understand what they're forfeiting in return.

It's sad to think that all the good things promised and accomplished by President Trump could be undone by obiden and his ilk.

^^They keep falling for the bait & switch, over and over and over...

$.02 worth,
Boss

quote:

Originally posted by sigspecops:
I keep hearing conflicting stories about the SC taking the TX lawsuit. Supposedly its on their docket but I've heard that they actually haven't agreed to take it.

It is most certainly on SCOTUS' docket: Texas v. Pennsylvania, et al. And they have demanded the defendant states file preliminary responses by today. Pennsylvania has, already. (It's ludicrous, IMO.) But it is my understanding SCOTUS has not (yet?) agreed to hear the case.

^^^^^^^^^^

We'll see what happens after 3:30pm today, the deadline for the four states/defendants.

quote:

Originally posted by ensigmatic:
And they have demanded the defendant states file preliminary responses by today. Pennsylvania has, already. (It's ludicrous, IMO.)

Wasn't it something like: drop the case or else. Or in other words, nice country you got there; be a shame if something happened to it.

What happens if the other three states don’t reply?

If the deadline is at 3:30pm eastern time then it looks like a little over and hour to go.

Balzé Halzé:
Originally posted by Ackks:
PA is basically like, yeah, we stole Boardwalk and Park place, but you let us keep them, or we flip the table.

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:

quote:

Originally posted by ensigmatic:
And they have demanded the defendant states file preliminary responses by today. Pennsylvania has, already. (It's ludicrous, IMO.)

Wasn't it something like: drop the case or else. Or in other words, nice country you got there; be a shame if something happened to it.

I believe it boiled-down to three arguments: "Lower courts have tossed similar lawsuits. Deciding in favor of the plaintiffs will result in distrust in our Constitutional order. If you don't toss this out there will be rioting in the streets."

quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:
Balzé Halzé:
Originally posted by Ackks:
PA is basically like, yeah, we stole Boardwalk and Park place, but you let us keep them, or we flip the table.

Perfect.

my understanding of the confusing situation

Texas filed against Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin (filed to Supreme Court)

Missouri, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, S Carolina and Utah filed to "intervene" and join Texas in the filing of Complaint

17 states filed an amicus brief supporting the Texas complaint

6 Things To Know About Texas’s Supreme Court Petition Over 2020’s Messed-Up Election

quote:

On Monday, Texas filed a motion for leave to file a “Bill of Complaint” with the U.S. Supreme Court to challenge the constitutionality of Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin’s administration of the 2020 presidential election. The combined filings, which also include a request for an expedited review and a preliminary injunction, spanned more than 150 pages. Here’s what you need to know about this latest election case.

Steve Crowder interviewing Texas A.G. Ken Paxton today. Explains the suit.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?...ZaY&feature=emb_logo

quote:

Originally posted by 12131:
^^^ I'm confused. Mind telling us what this has anything to do with the election?

Apologies. I'm pawing thru too many threads, and got disoriented.

District of Columbia filed an amici curiae in support of the defendants, joined by blue states such as CA, HI, NY, NJ, OR, Mass, MN, etc

https://www.supremecourt.gov/D...i%20DC%20et%20al.pdf

^^^ That brief is pure garbage, which I hope the Justices will see right through.

I believe there is a God and His hand helped form this country and that the Constitution is an inspired document. chellim1 was right that it's hanging by a thread.

I've said this before, but He gets a vote in this. He also writes things down, so when you look at the two sides, notice one side has states that stand with the Constitution and religious liberties, and the others are those who have been trying to destroy our country and closed churches.

The lines are drawn. I don't know if we win this case, but we are standing with God and the blessings He has given us. No matter what things aren't going how the other side is planning them.