Lefty... I agree that dems are going to cheat, even if they are REALLY bad at it.

However, Georgia is run by republicans (small r on purpose).

This does not compute with me... Baffled

Thanks springnr...

The Georgia Republican politicians are just like all other Republicans. They sit on their hands and let Democrats do whatever they please. All of this happened right under these idiots noses and they really could care less and there is zero motivation to fix any of it.

quote:

Originally posted by bozman:
Lefty... I agree that dems are going to cheat, even if they are REALLY bad at it.

On the contrary the dems have refined cheating into an art form. The fact that we cannot definitely state how long they have been doing it and the magnitude of the results that have been tainted in the past, is the first clue. Second the fact that oversight (if it can even be called that) of their cheating is either asleep at the wheel or folds like a lawn chair when hard decisions have to be made is the second clue. Then when the average citizen who demands accountability gets treated to a rigged game of three card monty between the courts, politicians and various government agencies is the third clue. The fact that the cheating is now so openly brazen shows that the dems have never acquired any fear of consequences from the overseeing agencies, and past history shows this hubris is not unfounded is the fourth clue.

The only thing working against the dems is their unconventional and wily opponent and some recently appointed USSC justices that can give Thomas and Alito some company. Time will tell if this is enough.

Rep. Mo Brooks: Congress Has ‘Absolute Right’ to Reject a State’s Electoral College Votes

https://www.theepochtimes.com/...reaking-2020-11-18-3

Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.) said that the presidential election’s final outcome may boil down to the invocation of the 12th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution in early January when Congress convenes.

“The ultimate say over whether to accept or reject” Electoral College votes for any state “is not a court’s job,” he said. “It is Congress’s job under” Article II of the 12th Amendment of the Constitution “coupled with federal statutes that govern this issue.”

“Congress has the absolute right to reject the submitted electoral college votes of any state, which we believe has such a shoddy election system that you can’t trust the election results that those states are submitting to us, that they’re suspect,” Brooks told Epoch Times this week. “And I’m not going to put my name in support of any state that employs an election system that I don’t have confidence in.”

Brooks noted that he doesn’t have confidence in the election results in several states, including Georgia and Pennsylvania, where Democrat Joe Biden is the projected winner by razor-thin margins. President Donald Trump’s campaign has filed lawsuits in several states, alleging irregularities, voter fraud, and violations of state election laws.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS)’s cybersecurity division said this week that the Nov. 3 election was the “most secure” in history, while several secretaries of state have said there is not enough evidence of voter fraud that would result in overturning the election. However, Federal Elections Commission Chairman Trey Trainor has said otherwise, claiming he believes “there is voter fraud” in several key states that went for Biden.

Brooks, perhaps in laying out a potential strategy the GOP will employ, said that “on January the sixth at 1 p.m. eastern time, the 50 states will report to Congress, the president [of the] Senate will preside over this meeting” and “will report to Congress what they contend are their electoral college results in their state.”

“If a House member and a senator objects to the submission of electoral college votes by any state, that immediately triggers a House floor vote and a Senate floor vote on whether to accept or reject those electoral college votes submitted by that particular state,” the Alabama Republican said. “The amount of debate on the House and Senate floor is limited to two hours under federal law.”

Brooks said Congress will then determine whether to reject certain Electoral College votes, thereby taking them “out of the mix.”

His reasoning for removing votes from certain states is because they’re “running a poor election system” and “a system so suspect that you can’t give credibility to the results that are being reported.”

Brooks said under the 12th Amendment, the House would then determine who the president will be, while the Senate will determine the vice president. In the House, he noted, it’s not a simple majority vote, but “it is a majority of the states who determine who the president … will be.”

“Based on the election results we just had, the GOP will control 26 states out of 50,” Brooks said. “That’s a majority with a possible 27th” as one election hasn’t been called yet, he added.

“Presumably, the Republican nominee would be favored, because the GOP controls a majority of the state delegations in the House of Representatives,” Brooks said.

The congressman noted that a similar situation unfolded nearly 200 years ago during the contingent election of 1824, which saw John Quincy Adams—who was the “second-place finisher”—elected president as no candidate won a majority of the electoral vote.

Several days ago, Harvard Law professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz predicted that Trump might attempt to settle the election in Congress.

“Let’s look at the big picture: The big picture now has shifted,” Dershowitz told Newsmax. “I do not believe that President Trump is now trying to get to 270 electoral votes. I think he thinks that’s out of the question.”

“What he’s trying to do is to deny Joe Biden 270 votes, by challenging in Pennsylvania, Georgia, in Nevada, in Michigan, in Arizona,” Dershowitz said, adding that not allowing Biden to reach 270 out of 538 votes would eventually force House state delegations to vote, where Republicans have an advantage over Democrats. Currently, the GOP has a 26-23-1 state delegation majority in the House of Representatives.

“If he can keep the Biden count below 270, then the matter goes to the House of Representatives, where, of course, there is a Republican majority among the delegations of states, and you vote by state if it goes to the House,” Dershowitz said. “He’s trying to follow the playbook of three elections of the 19th century.”

Side note: Has anybody heard from Para lately??? I haven't seen any posts from him in at least two weeks. Is he okay?

Thanks!

LOL... yeah, just found that thread moments after asking the question. Typical for me... :blush:

quote:

Originally posted by wcb6092:


Brooks, perhaps in laying out a potential strategy the GOP will employ, said that “on January the sixth at 1 p.m. eastern time, the 50 states will report to Congress, the president [of the] Senate will preside over this meeting” and “will report to Congress what they contend are their electoral college results in their state.”

“If a House member and a senator objects to the submission of electoral college votes by any state, that immediately triggers a House floor vote and a Senate floor vote on whether to accept or reject those electoral college votes submitted by that particular state,” the Alabama Republican said. “The amount of debate on the House and Senate floor is limited to two hours under federal law.”

I understand the House vote if neither get to 270, but this sounds like something different. Is this House floor vote based on state delegations as well? If not, what happens if the House votes to accept based on a majority vote and the Senate rejects? In a 50-50 Senate spit does Pence get to cast a vote?

Is there any good news from today or are we still in a holding pattern?

quote:

“If a House member and a senator objects to the submission of electoral college votes by any state, that immediately triggers a House floor vote and a Senate floor vote on whether to accept or reject those electoral college votes submitted by that particular state,”

Ackks....

From the above... Sounds to me like both chambers have to vote in the affirmative to allow the EC votes to stand. If they cannot get both chambers to vote in the affirmative, then I think it is a stalemate and the EC votes get put aside.

We will own the Senate. So that may be the Trump card

Not sure though... I am guessing.

Joey D
11/16/20

No description provided

quote:

Originally posted by bozman:

Ackks....

From the above... Sounds to me like both chambers have to vote in the affirmative to allow the EC votes to stand. If they cannot get both chambers to vote in the affirmative, then I think it is a stalemate and the EC votes get put aside.

We will own the Senate. So that may be the Trump card

Not sure though... I am guessing.

Hope you are right, but you are more optimistic than I am about Romney and the two idiots voting to give him another 4 years. Hell would freeze before Romney went with us on that one.

quote:

Originally posted by HuskySig:
Is there any good news from today or are we still in a holding pattern?

If half of what L Lin Wood shares within this interview actually happens there are going to be explosive developments to surface in the 2020 election challenge.

It is difficult to encapsulate the content of this interview and I would strongly suggest listening to it carefully.

If L Lin Wood is correct, it would reconcile why the media and Big Tech are positioning their recent efforts as a zero-sum game.

DEEP STATE WILL BE DEFEATED



https://theconservativetreehou...will-all-go-to-jail/

Here's the Michigan doxxer(terrorist) who threatened the children of one of the Republicans:

Maybe he should be "doxxed".

https://www.dailywire.com/news...utm_source=housefile

Michigan Democrat Doxxes Republican’s Children Before She Reverses Course To Certify County Vote
By Amanda Prestigiacomo
•
Nov 18, 2020 DailyWire.com

Two Republicans on the Wayne County Board of Canvassers were berated, smeared as racists, and one even had her children doxxed before the pair reversed course on Tuesday night to certify the vote in Michigan’s most populated county.

Abraham Aiyash, a Democrat Michigan state representative-elect, spoke of Republican Monica Palmer’s children and named their school as he berated her for being a “racist.” The Federalist reports:

You, Ms. Monica Palmer from Grosse Pointe Woods, which has a history of racism, are deciding to enable and continue to perpetuate the racist history of this country and I want you to think about what that means for your kids,” he said, name-dropping the name of their school and talking about the impact her decision would have on their black classmates.



.

He should be more than doxxed.

What he did is beyond criminal!!!

I suppose doxxing can work both ways. Isn't there a "Michigan Milia" in the vicinity?

I'm not sure why some people like doxxing. If you want to kill their kids, their wives, their parents, or their cousins it is easy as hell to find out who they are, including the doxxer. This is a zero sum game for these assholes. I don't think they've played that game to the last move. Arghhhh. WTF happened???

I think the state police or fbi should get involved with those "threats".

And what is the law concerning signing something under duress.

quote:

Originally posted by TigerDore:
Abraham Aiyash, a Democrat Michigan state representative-elect, ...

Savages be savages even when elected to (formerly?) august bodies, I guess.

Ensi,

Your posts help get me back to normal (if there is such a thing). Thanks dude.

Nevada lawsuit filed...
https://www.newsmax.com/politi...020/11/18/id/997722/

A new lawsuit in Nevada challenging election results in the state claims numerous irregularities including 15,000 votes cast by people from out of state and as many as 200,000 ballots where the signature verification done by a machine was unreliable.

The suit, filed on behalf of the six Republican electors from the state designated for President Donald Trump, accused that Nevada officials “developed and implemented an election system that was highly susceptible to fraud and abuse,” the result of which renders the election “illegitimate.”

The case, filed in First Judicial District Court in Carson City, seeks that Trump be declared winner of the presidential election in the state.

Former Vice President Joe Biden leads Trump by about 33,000 votes out of more than 1.4 million cast according to results posted by The Associated Press.

The most serious claim in the suit revolves around Clark County, centered around Las Vegas, and its use of Runbeck Election Services’ Agilis Ballot Sorting System machines.

With Nevada one of eight states – plus the District of Columbia – that conducted its election via a universal absentee ballot system, meaning that every registered voter was sent a ballot whether or not it was requested, the Republican electors claim the state received 8½ times the number of votes as it did in the 2016 election, and Clark County received 10 times more ballots.

“Clark County officials and election personnel were not prepared to accurately and efficiently verify signatures on the mail-in ballots with election personnel as required by law,” the lawsuit states. It says Clark County then used the Agilis system, the reliability of which “has not been established by scientific study and testing to a degree that warrants their use in elections.”